But? What sense of disequilibrium would cause you to write such a thing? If you are genuinely not upset, then there is no need for any "but."
Maybe you're just not yet sure how you feel about things. Maybe you're having second thoughts about voting for either of the two major candidates. Maybe you're just not comfortable trying to calibrate the fine gradations of evil that separate Obama from Romney.
Maybe there's hope for you, after all.
Trust God. Reject evil.
Idiot ....
If we do not stand for something then we stand for nothing. I do not know who wrote that but it is true. If we keep voting for the lesser of the two evils we lose anyway.
I am willing to give up everything, including my life, and fight my way back to freedom and liberty. My children may have to do so by my side but they may then respect what they have earned. It looks like our society as a whole does not respect it now. They are too lazy and want their free stuff.
“If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.” [Samuel Adams]
W
What a tired argument. They know very well that most Freepers will probably vote for Mittens. They are upset that the website won’t officially endorse their liberal.
It’s a very one sided truce since the Romneybots won’t shaddup.
It selects for Narcissists and Aristocrats
The Republic would be better replaced by a Meritocracy
So, just because a poster posted an article critical of Romney (and his lifelong love of abortion) that is suspicious of his views on pro-life... we are all terrible, horrible people?
Seriously??
Please tell me these TrueBlue sniffers aren’t serious??
Yes, let’s just sweep those nasty little facts about Mittens under the carpet. Close your eyes, hold your nose, turn off your brain, and take up the GOP banner so we can welcome the next socialist into office!
Establishment talking points at their finest.
According to the actions of the current and previous versions of Mitt Romney, his being the "other" choice could also be a symptom.
Unless the Mittster has something like "Paul's conversion" on some absolutely vital issues, I don't yet see how anything he'll do can save America from what's coming. It ain't about the money.
The symptoms and signs are everywhere, but unless we understand the problem, short of a divine miracle, it's unlikely we'll figure it out.
And there's not a lot left on the clock.
And your point is?
Romney V Romney Dark
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Which one will I choose ???
OOO which one is less repugnant...
Do you rememeber that eposode of The Odd Couple with the Pigeon sisters ???
Yeah the ABO are like that...
Only worse...
“but what really irritates me is this active campaigning against people who would support Romney”
Geanakos.Chris, do you think it is possible that despite the “campaigning” that you may think exists here on FR...in support of or against Romney, that people can and will make up their own minds?
I would hope that I would not be so gullible to be swayed by another person’s musings. ...These are opinions shared here by every day folks. Take what you like and leave the rest.
The Democrat candidate will be the President in 2013.
Same "comment" I posted on another thread.
You vote for Romney and you get a small reshuffle of the height in pile "a" of bullshit compared to the same height of the pile of bullshit "b" under another 4 of the O.
If you want to change things. Truly change things. Make the change in your heart, in your mind, and then your hands.
People call Jimrob insane. Stupid. Whatever.
All I see are people who are sliding slowly and with absolute consent into the gates of hell, sitting on their ass and crying about it.
Conservative? Yeah, I AM putting more pressure on my right ass cheek.
Oh..wait..silly me...that is YOU sliding by....
The only "good thing" about Romney politically is that his democrat opponents were never able to claim that he would take away the woman's "right" to choose. The closest they've ever come to that was by claiming that Romney is not pro-choice or pro-life, he's multiple choice.
Hey, that's the fact. You nominated him, now you have to get him elected.
Where we conservatives went wrong was allowing too many conservatives split the ticket allowing Romney to win. That's our fault. Romney faced a split opposition.
Don't blame me I voted for Newt. You should have too
I have said this on other threads, I will say it again. I will not vote for romney. HE is pro-abortion no matter how hard his supporters feverishly wish it not true. That said, I will vote for a child molester before I will vote for that child murdering used car salesman. GOP-e thought they could cram another of their crappy rinos down the throats of people who have principles- well, this time they are wrong. They chose poorly and I do not care how much it bugs the ABO people. I will not vote for a man who will allow little innocent children to be murdered in their mothers womb.. Call me what you want- I do not care— IF it will help you I am a fool, I am an ignorant hick from the backwoods of North Carolina- I am stupid.. I have been called all of these things , but you know, I wear those names with honor from the likes of you who would allow the murder of babies to make a political point. HAVE AT IT.
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
Unfortunately, no...we are not all opposed to 0bama here. In fact, I am convinced there is a hard core of support for 0bama here on FR. How else do you explain the endless campaign against the GOP nominee? Don’t want to vote for a candidate? Ok, don’t vote for him; you’ll help the other guy, but that’s life. But to carry on a relentless campaign against 0bama’s only serious challenger? There is one reason and one reason only for that behavior: You want 0bama to have a second term.