And that's enough to get me to vote for Romney. ;^) I'll take some chance over no chance.
I’m just darn ready to put my foot down and say no MORE “lesser of the two evils”!
We (in the general sense) have sacrificed every shred of self respect to fear and “second best” and safe.
Charles, May I suggest you reread that Biblical account where two women claiming the same baby appealed to Solomon to decide the matter, and he wittily chose to cut him/her in half to determine who the real mother was?
'Twas the real mom who said, "No, I don't need a place @ the baby's table if it means only half a baby."
Some of those pro-life groups you referenced in your post #263 ("Notice also, that now, in 2012, a lot of prominent, reliable, pro-life people are endorsing Romney") are ones who can't stand being left on the outside and having no place at the endorsement or influence table...they'd rather be @ table with "half a baby" than "no baby" -- even if the baby was kept alive by keeping him away from that table!
After all, if some of those ex-"pro-life" groups don't have any baby to show for their continued existence (even if only half of one), they're out of business. (Got to keep the pro-life movement alive, even if the immobilized babies for the large part aren't kept alive)
Bottom line: Your "some chance" gamble (and since when are men in your position advocating gambling with the lives of pre-born?) is the "we'll-take-half-a-baby syndrome" too many Pro-lifers are committing to. You'll take half-a-baby or none, eh?
“Eat me last!”