Why Kenyan Birth Claim Was No 'Fact Checking Error'

American Thinker ^ | MAY 18, 2012 | Jack Cashill

[RobinMasters]

No sooner did the literary agency brochure in which Barack Obama was said to be Kenyan-born surface than the media went to work to deep-six it.

"This was nothing more than a fact checking error by me - an agency assistant at the time," Miriam Goderich, now a named partner in the literary agency, Dystel & Goderich, wrote in an emailed statement to Yahoo News, which was then picked up ABC News. "There was never any information given to us by Obama in any of his correspondence or other communications suggesting in any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii. I hope you can communicate to your readers that this was a simple mistake and nothing more."

This confession rings false to the point of preposterous for any number of reasons. Let us start with the obvious. At the time, 1991, the Acton & Dystel agency listed 90 clients, Obama among its least significant. How likely is it that Goderich would have remembered enough about a 1991 "error" to know it was hers, especially since it went uncorrected through several revisions until changed in 2007? To make this claim credible, there would have to be an existing paper trail leading to an Obama submission in which he lists an Hawaiian birth. I am confident that there is no such submission.

[Terry Mross]

It wouldn’t have bothered me one bit had mccain been found not eligible. But mccain’s birth and the ‘resolution’ passed by the senate saying he was eligible proves they all knew that obama was not.

[IWONDR]

“To be a natural born US citizen, both your parents DO NOT have to be natural born US citizens themselves.”

You are correct that both parents don’t have to be NBC’s for their son to be eligible to run for President in the US, BUT they both have to be of age and also citizens of the US. Obama’s claimed father was not a US citizen, but was a citizen of Kenya under British rule.

[neverdem]

BTTT!