Posted on 05/15/2012 5:36:44 PM PDT by GoldenEagles
WILLARD M. ROMNEY
THE RAT AND HORROR
CONNECTION
I would like to propose, as matter of political strategy, that all of those who are opposed to the dark shadow of godlessness, rebellion, i.e. RINOism that Willard M. Romney is casting upon the once bright landscape of the Republican Party, and it was a bright landscape during the Ronald Reagan years, that is for sure, that we make a simple change in our communication strategy.
I see that most FreeRepublic members have stopped helping the homosexual movement advance their agenda by dropping the use of their propaganda term "gay", as homosexuals are the most miserable people on the planet, always gasping for breath, in terms of public support, because their sense of self-worth is in a constant state of melt-down.
I would propose the same change in the way we refer to Romney. We should stop using the word "Mitt" as this is a beloved baseball term, and denotes that the person can catch the ball that is thrown to him, which is a blatant falsehood when it comes to Romney. The Lord God has thrown the ball of obedience to Romney on many occasions, even soft lobs over home plate, and he has dropped the ball every time.
Instead of "Mitt" we should just spell out his name as it was given to him at birth. Willard M. Romney.
The name Willard is not a beautiful name. And that matches Romney's rebellious heart. So we move closer to the truth by calling him by his first name.
Moreover, in the deep, and even the not-so-deep, recesses of American memory, people associate the term "rat" and the quality of horror with the name "Willard" because there was a 1971 movie by that name, which was actually redone under the same name "Willard" in 2003. Google "Willard" and this comes up at the top.
Willard had an army of rats that he unleashed on his enemies. Hmmm ... that sounds eerily similar to what Romney has actually done in this campaign.
The association between the name "Willard" and rats and horror is fairly strongly entrenched in the American psyche.
While I would never call anyone a "rat", clearly Romney is accurately described as a horror to those who believe in safeguarding American traditional values, and an additional horror when it comes to the ease at which he could destroy, through lies, the reputation of good conservatives, Gingrich and Santorum, and become so quickly the choice of the Republican Party for President even when everybody knows this individual was totally Anti-Regean.
I mean if the Republican Party ever had a hero, it was Ronald Reagan, and Romney was an enemy of Reagan. This is certainly a horror that Romney could so easily rip the heart out of the Republican Party, and entice so many people to gather around him to lap up the blood spilled all over the floor.
So please, whenever we need to mention Romney, I would encourage all who are interested in saving the soul of the Republican party, to please drop the "Mitt" and spell it out, WILLARD M. ROMNEY.
(And ask people to Google the name "Willard").
>>Obama is toast <
From your fingers to God’s ears.
The position you are taking on why others should support Romney clearly identify you with the coalition faction we identify as GOP-e.
>>There are no “independents”.<<
LOL!!
The state of Michigan says otherwise.
As I said in the post that set you off, I better understand the passion that can lead to brother fighting brother the more I discern of the complete division between those who will vote their conscious and those who will vote their conscious. (both sides think they are right).
Beck was supporting Romney and dismissing Palin back when he was truly threatened by Palin, once the real threat passed, then Beck went through the process of beards.
Gingrich was a possible threat until “Bloody Thursday” and Beck gave him the full (destructive) treatment.
Who is “we” ? I’m a Conservative. I don’t vote for liars, con-artists and Socialists like Willard. If he is YOUR only hope (if you consider yourself a Conservative), then you’re screwed.
Exactly. Case in point.
Now, as it happens, I believe in the God of the Bible and in His only Son, Jesus Christ.
I believe that Mormonism is not of the Bible and thus is against God. But I also believe the same is true about Islam, atheism, and leftism.
I oppose Mormonism, but I think that Romney will be better for America, and liberty, and ultimately for God's mission on this earth, than Obama will.
>>Pray every day for the ressurrection of a united Gingrich/Santorum ticket. With God all things are possible. <<
No way. I’m praying for God’s will to be done and NOTHING else.
It’s crazy to beg for what YOU want over what HE wants. He will show the way. That is if you are not blinded by your will and not His.
He never said it would be easy.
I’m so with you.
Being Catholic, I don’t have a dog in that fight.
I am. See my tagline. Defeat Willard ! Demand the GOP dump him for a Conservative in Tampa !
A number of people keep saying this and using this as their reason for actively (if not explicitly) promoting Obama's re-election. This even though Obama is a liar, a con-artist, and a socialist.
Understand it I cannot.
We have nonpartisan voter registration in Virginia. Still, that doesn’t mean voters in Virginia are not political.
Really, you people are taking a risk with our party and our country we can little afford.
Tell MItt to step aside for someone who can win.
Romney cannot win this election. The dark side has all of you scrambling after a total mirage. I wish I could say something that would help you see, but you all seem like blind bats with your radar turned off.
Seriously, if you are going to keep quoting JR, and making the most troll like insults against good conservative freepers, who are known and respected conservatives, then why don’t you ping him to your insults?
So if Zero decided to run as a Republican, would you vote for him ? Because that's exactly what you're asking Conservatives to do in supporting an execrable fraud like Willard.
I don't think I am. I certainly think that all of my posts to this thread are readily understandable. Is there some specific example you see of something I posted that is somehow confused?
~ it's not too late for Romney to remove himself from this campaign.
Why would he do this? He has spent years getting where he is. He has the nomination all but locked up. Why would he just walk away from it now? When has anyone ever done something like that? Never, that's when.
We don't need him; no one likes him;
Millions of GOP primary voters like him. Millions more like him better than any of the alternatives that were on offer. You call me confused and then post nonsense.
Have you noticed how much dysfunction and division there is on FR these days? Do you think that maybe this post of yours might be contributing to this?
A huge number of primary voters have not a clue who the REAL Willard is. He’s just the liar pretending to be the Conservative he never was, never has been, and never will be.
This settles it for me. I’m switching to Obama from Romney.,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.