Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Reading the actual report, there are ‘challenges’

“Uncertainty about viable technologies. A significant challenge to the development of oil shale lies in the uncertainty surrounding the viability of current technologies to economically extract oil from oil shale.

To extract the oil, the rock needs to be heated to very high temperatures—ranging from about 650 to 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit — in a process known as retorting. Retorting can be accomplished primarily by two methods. One method involves mining the oil shale, bringing it to the surface, and heating it in a vessel known as a retort.

Mining oil shale and retorting it has been demonstrated in the United States and is currently done to a limited extent in Estonia, China, and Brazil. However, a commercial mining operation with surface retorts has never been developed in the United States because the oil it produces competes directly with conventional crude oil, which historically has been less expensive to produce.

The other method, known as an in-situ process, involves drilling holes into the oil shale, inserting heaters to heat the rock, and then collecting the oil as it is freed from the rock. Some in-situ technologies have been demonstrated on very small scales, but other technologies have yet to be proven, and none has been shown to be economically or environmentally viable at a commercial scale. According to some energy experts, the key to developing our country’s oil shale is the development of an in-situ process because most of the richest oil shale is buried beneath hundreds to thousands of feet of rock, making mining difficult or impossible.

In addition to these uncertainties, transporting the oil produced from oil shale to refineries may pose challenges because pipelines and major highways are not prolific in
the remote areas where the oil shale is located, and the large-scale”


24 posted on 05/13/2012 9:53:23 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

I saw a guy on TV once who had this medium sized box, like a breadbox, with a spigot on it.

He put a rock in the box, a beaker under the spigot, and turned it on - a few minutes later, the beaker was half filled with fairly clean oil.

It was a modded microwave - it literally boils the oil out of the rocks without actually heating the shale.


36 posted on 05/13/2012 10:55:59 PM PDT by djf ("There are more old drunkards than old doctors." - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

The shale oil there is actually kerogen sediment. (does kerosene link ring a bell?)

Kerosene was first retorted from kerogen in the mid 1800’s from deposits in New Brusnwick, Ontario and Nova Scotia.


47 posted on 05/14/2012 12:23:37 AM PDT by Sea Parrot (I'll be a nice to you as you'll let me be, or as mean as you make me be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson