Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: Romney 50%, Obama 42%. Obama at -22%. 44% Approval
RasmussenReports ^ | 5/12/12 | Scott Rasmussen

Posted on 05/12/2012 6:43:05 AM PDT by NE Cons

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 next last
To: Condor51; stephenjohnbanker; Clintonfatigued; indylindy; GOPJ; Libloather; GOPsterinMA; ...
"You 'n your lousy ideas. I oughta throw you off the ticket."

<

"You hadda suckup to a bunch of sicko perverts. And drag me
into it. The whole dam country is in Romney's pocket, going
Republican. "

"Me? I'm stuck with you....and a buncha queers sizing up my
***, trying to get my private phone number. Michelle is furious."

161 posted on 05/13/2012 8:51:37 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Liz

LOL!!


162 posted on 05/13/2012 9:45:54 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Wait until the latest cover of Newsweak gets emailed around, and posted on a thousand blogs and social nets:


163 posted on 05/13/2012 10:40:30 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS DESTROYING AMERICA-LOOK AT WHAT IT DID TO THE WHITE HOUSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
So, you won’t see my comments around here.

Good riddance.....just shut up and go away.

164 posted on 05/13/2012 12:11:42 PM PDT by ScreamingFist (Quiet the Idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

If Obama were white, his numbers would be even worse; much worse most likely.

I’m guessing a lot of moderate-suburbanite type voters have too much white guilt to turn against him like they would a similarly incompetent and failed white Democrat.


165 posted on 05/13/2012 12:15:48 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

I’m the sure the Liberal Messiah just loves that cover. I hope Newsweek doesn’t change it.


166 posted on 05/13/2012 12:17:28 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

I know another commenter remarked on the simple truth of your post and the rightness of it.

I mostly agree but let’s not forget this is a guy who held down a gay kid and cut off his beautiful blonde curls, the WAPO told me this.

NO WAIT! You don’t think they’re floating this kind of stuff just to take down that very image of normalcy your comment praised?

Nah. Sure the President of the U.S. is too important to engage in such smallness. And the Washington Post, the paper of Woodward and Bernstein would accept such a stupid story?

No way!


167 posted on 05/13/2012 2:00:13 PM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

I thought the law was specifically written so that the individual mandate is NOT severable from the main law. IE, if the mandate goes down, the whole law goes down.

Dems did it that way on purpose, just SO the mandate wouldn’t go down, that’s how important it is to them.

Been reading since law was passed it can’t be severed. At least I thought that was the jist of it.


168 posted on 05/13/2012 2:03:16 PM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk
I thought the law was specifically written so that the individual mandate is NOT severable from the main law.

There was supposed to be a severability clause in the bill, but that was mistakenly left out of the bill. Thus, ObamaCare says nothing regarding severability. In that situation, courts presume the legislature intended severability.

That presumption is overcome if either (1) it is proven that the legislature intended the unconstitutional provision to be nonseverable or (2) the unconstitutional provision is seen as essential (the law can not reasonable function without it).

169 posted on 05/13/2012 3:20:01 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
There was supposed to be a severability clause in the bill, but that was mistakenly left out of the bill.

You've got to be kidding me. "Mistakenly" left out? All that hullabaloo about that health care bill and one of the most important parts of the bill they "mistakenly" left out?

I gotta bridge to sell anybody believes this. My guess is that they told all those concerned that the Supremes would overturn any mandate that the bill would allow the mandate to be severed and the health care system overhaul would still move forward.

Only somebody done went and "mistakenly" left it out, just doggone.

170 posted on 05/13/2012 4:35:31 PM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; GOPsterinMA

This a referendum on Obama. Unless he sticks his foot in his mouth Romney may as well be a potted plant.


171 posted on 05/13/2012 5:13:50 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
If Romney manages to pull out a win, it will be entirely due to the the Anyone But Obama vote.
I admit I never would choose Romney except in a race against Obama. My prayer is that the GOP holds or adds to their advantage in the House and gets the Senate back and basically leads President Romney along a conservative road. Might be ridiculous but hopefully it will prove true.
172 posted on 05/13/2012 5:49:52 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
This is the initial run of my Rasmussen state-by-state Senate model.

The model begins with the final results of the last Class 1 election, and I will update those results with current Rasmussen state polls as they are published.

I'll begin by listing the states that have recent polls, and then list the states that are still within the margin-of- error.

Final 2010 Senate results were Republicans taking 47 seats, and Democrats caucusing 53 seats. My model begins here.

Below are the first round of state polls. The first number is the change in GOP result from the last poll (or seat election if no prior poll), and the second number is the separation from the Democrat candidate's result. "No Poll" means the state's last final election vote is within the default margin of error (4.5%). For incumbants, the seat will be considered safe until a new poll is taken.

Watch List:

Using the most recent Rasmussen polls, the results of 32,000 simulated elections are listed in the table below. The definitions of the columns are:

Week GOP
Senate
Seats
P10
GOP
Senate
Seats
EV
GOP
Senate
Seats
P90
Probability
of 51
GOP
Gain
2010 Election 47 47 47 0.00% 0
11-May-12 50 51.24 52 77.01% 4

-PJ

173 posted on 05/14/2012 12:47:39 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush

We know the type of judicial appointees Obama will appoint: in-your-face, unapolgetic leftists. He’s already appointed two but two or three more will seal the fate of this county for a decade or more.

That is a most disturbing certainty of four more years of this chraracter. This is on top of his Marxist economic leanings.

A SCOTUS comprised of (5) hard leftists for the next 10-15 years will be catastrophic for a country that leans center-right

Even should Romney replace Kennedy and Ginsburg with two moderates we might stand a snowball’s chance. Anything more is gravy, anything less is a disaster of the first order.


174 posted on 05/14/2012 2:06:05 AM PDT by RonnG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: NE Cons

I think it may be time for us here at FR to move towards Romney.


175 posted on 05/14/2012 3:09:27 AM PDT by stockpirate (Romney, Ann Coulter & our ruling republican elites, are Big Government socialists, Grand Ole Sociali)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
To: NE Cons

I think it may be time for us here at FR to move towards Romney.

Oh my!

Is it too early to pop some corn?

You are a brave soul, friend and hope you have donned your flame-retardent jammies as I predict the handful of Hate-Romney/Mormons will soon be at your throat with their pathetic arguments that Mittens is 10 times more dangerous and a threat than Dear Leader, even though while there is ample evidence that the Community Agitator is actively working to destroy Capitalims, if not our Republic, and though there is not ONE shred of evidence to show that Romney has said or done anything to indicate he would do same, that makes no nevermind to those who are blinded by their hate.

Stay well, stay safe and God Bless.

Count me in as an Anyone but Obama acolyte.

176 posted on 05/14/2012 4:08:34 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Nice try... But you would be wrong


177 posted on 05/14/2012 4:17:22 AM PDT by NE Cons (Was a Hard-Core Perry supporter. Now Hard-Core ABO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Excellent post!


178 posted on 05/14/2012 4:23:08 AM PDT by NE Cons (Was a Hard-Core Perry supporter. Now Hard-Core ABO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

Exactly... The hate here is unreal... And notice how they ping each other then attack you like rabid dogs... Severely twisted folks


179 posted on 05/14/2012 4:29:03 AM PDT by NE Cons (Was a Hard-Core Perry supporter. Now Hard-Core ABO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Good analysts, but unless you’re using state polls that are all more recent, these stale polls don’t reflect reality....


180 posted on 05/14/2012 4:32:02 AM PDT by NE Cons (Was a Hard-Core Perry supporter. Now Hard-Core ABO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson