Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: savagesusie
Coed teams are for fun and men who hurt women on those teams are usually reviled.

It's good to see you in full backtrack mode here. So now co-ed leagues are fun and not an invention of Marx; you even admit that your own children play in them.

Thanks for proving my point.

229 posted on 05/11/2012 6:47:09 AM PDT by GunRunner (***Not associated with any criminal actions anonymus by the ATF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: GunRunner

No.

Excluding psychology of “play” vs. organized teams for real competition and trophys which could lead to college scholarships like my daughter had or to professional sports like many boys desire——you have to play on non-coed teams to develop the correct intensity. True, girls get much better playing against boys (if they don’t get injured)—because boys by nature are superior in desire by nature to be dominant—the strongest where girls have to learn it. Exceptions—yes-—but many boys have their desires and maleness demeaned or disparaged when they are in the formative years. “Competing” against girls disparages their maleness and is trying to get boys to identify with women-—to mold their nature—into what he is not. They are giving the boy a “worldview” (partial—yes—but if he is taught he is no different from girls, he will have that worldview. Differentiation is essential in young boys and harder for boys than girls, but is necessary for natural male sexual development). Breaking away from “mother” to become other is only the step girls have in common with boys-—boys must then (unlike girls) identify with the male role model-Father. Boys natures are more complicated because of this and if no father at home or extended male relatives, it becomes nearly impossible.

If no male role model (why Marx wants family unit destroyed)—then his nature is perverted and he ends up like the Tyler lesbian’s boy who by four was trying to cut off his penis) or he becomes a “gang” member to prove his maleness which he never had modeled to him or he just models himself after women role models and has a hard time fitting into society. Kids copy what they see and their reality can become extremely bizarre if they are not in a normal family structure which loves both maleness and femaleness and models that love and teaches them the differences in nature.

Hatred for self—because there is no “other” to identify is caused in early childhood. It can happen with an abusive father like Hitler’s, boys will refuse to identify with the male in these cases.

Boys like playing with boys-—it is for identification of self—to learn what male is. Girls need to play with girls—to learn what female is, to understand self and reality. True—radical segregation creates irrational societies also. Boys and girls have to learn about their differences by being exposed to the opposite sex in normal situations.

BUT in the Romantic period, (Christian society), we developed chivalry which other non-western societies don’t have. Attitudes are always learned. Respect and dignity came from Christianity—offshoot from Judaism which adopted marriage between one man and one woman—(equality in marriage).This respect of women was learned in family structure—which become the child’s worldview—his reality of the world—what is normal.

Parents who confuse young children into thinking (biologically lies)—that there is no difference between male and female is teaching Marxist lies. It denies nature—denies God’s design. You need to differentiate the sexes.

Marxism has forced women into dominate male roles—like firefighter, where it confuses young boys. Women have no place in a fire department. Less than one percent of women even have the strength to do what the average man can do. Look at children’s books-—firefighters are always female. Policemen are always “female”. In the fifties, there was no gender confusion. It is to make men and women interchangeable==for Marx’s utopian society.

Homosexual marriage forces this gender confusion and WILL solidify it. It is why the push for “marriage” and not just civil unions by Marxists—to force the worldview in all little children when they see constant pictures of men kissing, etc. Sexual behavior and attitudes are learned by environment. Societies used to condone pederasty which Judeo/Christian societies eliminated—but Afghanistan still has pederasty is good worldview—and so it is promoted to children who “love” it and can’t wait to be adults and have their own harems.

People want to think that homosexuality is genetic. No. Desire can be directed towards any objects in young childhood by parental interaction. Early childhood determines what qualities children will look for in long term relationships. Indeed, their early childhood determines whether they can trust or not and if they “can” have long term relationships. The object of desire is set in early childhood unless trauma or sexual development interference occurs—such as not letting boys identify and be friends with other boys. They need peer acceptance for healthy development.

Boys are NOT improved by playing with girls-—they do better and improve by playing with boys. Only some girls can compete with boys at a decent level and that is ALWAYS before age 12 or so—until the boys hit puberty. Lots of girls have no desire to be superior in sports, by nature. I knew many girls who could care less about sports. Most boys love sports—and it is nature.

My daughter BTW was superior to other girls and got all MVP awards in high school girl teams because she played with her older brothers who taught her to play like a “boy”. She loved her brothers and copied what she saw-—always playing sports....from her youngest age. It was natural for her to compete like her brothers, but she loved dresses, dance, and her close girlfriends. She always had all-girl things she did also.

Christian ethics only is what created coed teams where males are reviled for hurting women on coed teams. I played as a young girl with the boys in the street and loved the nature of boys....very different from me and my sister. They used to be very respectful although very competitive. I played paper dolls with my sister and loved my baby dolls which my brothers had no interest in. Learned—absolutely, modeled, absolutely, but with glorifying the maleness and femaleness of human beings and acknowledging that there is a difference and that God’s Design is brilliant. Indeed—my Catholic culture made me love God, motherhood and my body, and love men. Then God gave me four boys and a daughter-—whose natures I and my husband could nurture and affirm as was designed by God—not Marx.


234 posted on 05/11/2012 8:57:29 AM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson