Skip to comments.
U.S. weekly jobless claims fall 1,000 to 367,000
marketwatch.com ^
| May 10, 2012
| Jeffry Bartash
Posted on 05/10/2012 5:53:50 AM PDT by John W
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The number of Americans who filed requests for jobless benefits fell by a scant 1,000 last week to 367,000, the U.S. Labor Department said Thursday. Claims from two weeks ago were revised up to 368,000 from 365,000. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch had projected claims would total 365,000 on seasonally adjusted basis in the week ended May 5.
(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
05/10/2012 5:53:54 AM PDT
by
John W
To: All
Recovery Spring?
Why doesn’t Dear Leader just write an executive diktat stating unemployment is illegal so anyone reporting themselves as unemployed will be jailed and sent to re-education camps.
2
posted on
05/10/2012 5:56:10 AM PDT
by
newnhdad
(Where will you be during the Election Riots of 2012/2013?)
To: John W
I suspect the number crunchers must have some idea of what the new numbers are before they “revise” those from the previous week. What was actually a 2K increase morphed into a 1K decrease. Hallelujah!!
3
posted on
05/10/2012 5:57:08 AM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... so should voting!)
To: John W
...wait....to be readjusted next week as always....
4
posted on
05/10/2012 5:57:40 AM PDT
by
Doogle
(((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
To: John W
Because the Democrats hired 1000 talk show seminar callers last week?
To: John W
Dang! Finally the economy is turning around. LOL! What happens when they revise the numbers next week? Oops! There they go again. UNEXPECTEDLY lower? How many times can people believe the “unexpected” claim? Puulleeeezzz!
Helping keep mankind warm for almost 65 years.
6
posted on
05/10/2012 5:58:45 AM PDT
by
rktman
To: John W
Claims two weeks ago: 365k
Claims last week: 367k
An increase of 2k.
Is something wrong with my math?
7
posted on
05/10/2012 6:00:52 AM PDT
by
icwhatudo
(This is not a choice between Romney&Reagan-Its between Romney & most radical leftist Pres in history)
To: John W
If they are always falling in the media then why are there still almost 400,000 Americans filing for more jobless claims? And this is in a shrunken job market that mostly are government workers, workers in non profits (government grants), government contractors , all paid for by trillions in Obama debt.
8
posted on
05/10/2012 6:00:54 AM PDT
by
rurgan
(Sunset all laws at 3 years. China makes everything taking U.S. ability to manufacture)
To: icwhatudo
The media lies and lies again to get Obama reelected as the media lied against Palin to get Obama elected in 2008.
9
posted on
05/10/2012 6:01:58 AM PDT
by
rurgan
(Sunset all laws at 3 years. China makes everything taking U.S. ability to manufacture)
To: John W
10
posted on
05/10/2012 6:05:53 AM PDT
by
tomkat
( FU.baraq <font finger=middle>)
To: John W
In the
'full article' on the linked website, we have this:
Claims from two weeks ago were revised up to 368,000 from an original reading of 365,000.
Revised up! .......... AGAIN.
11
posted on
05/10/2012 6:06:37 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: John W
Is this the second or third “Recovery summer?” I forget.
12
posted on
05/10/2012 6:08:37 AM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: icwhatudo
Is something wrong with my math?
Yes. In the full article, the 2 week previous number was revised up from 365k to 368k, resulting in a net increase of ONLY 1000, not 2000.
lol
More Fun with Numbers.
13
posted on
05/10/2012 6:10:17 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Huskrrrr
14
posted on
05/10/2012 6:10:31 AM PDT
by
John W
(Viva Cristo Rey!)
To: icwhatudo
There's math. And then there's
government math.
Last week's 365K number was revised to 368K so that this weeks' 367K claims number could be reported as having "beaten" expectations. Rah. Rah.
Now, when this weeks' number is revised upwards next week (and it will be), today's result will be revealed to have been be a "miss" - but by then, it will be down the memory hole, which is the whole point of the exercise.
15
posted on
05/10/2012 6:16:14 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: John W
The headline excludes a key word: “New”. These are NEW jobless claims.
To: icwhatudo
17
posted on
05/10/2012 6:19:19 AM PDT
by
C210N
("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
To: JaguarXKE
Noticed that. After various April data were released too many people were doing the “jobs created” vs. “new unemployment claims” math and the results weren’t very supportive of the president. Can’t have that.
18
posted on
05/10/2012 6:26:07 AM PDT
by
John W
(Viva Cristo Rey!)
To: andy58-in-nh
How convenient... Last week revised EXEACTLY by the amount it would take to show a loss this week.
19
posted on
05/10/2012 6:27:16 AM PDT
by
NE Cons
To: John W
Once again, revised numbers last week, so media can report a ‘decline’ this week.
the deception rolls on.
O Must Go
Shellacking part II
Nov 2012
20
posted on
05/10/2012 6:27:25 AM PDT
by
Freddd
(No PA Engineers)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson