Pass the poppcorn........
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Train wreck for the NAGS on the horizon!
2 posted on
05/09/2012 9:50:54 AM PDT by
Iron head mike
(The government will soon make criminals of us all.)
To: Sub-Driver
Every time they engage him they lose. Every. Single. Time.
He has GOT to love this!
3 posted on
05/09/2012 9:51:07 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: Sub-Driver
She sure knows a lot about conservative women.
4 posted on
05/09/2012 9:51:07 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
To: Sub-Driver
When you throw a stone into a pack of dogs, the one that yelps is the one that got hit.
5 posted on
05/09/2012 9:52:10 AM PDT by
brownsfan
(Aldous Huxley and Mike Judge were right.)
To: Sub-Driver
Yea and all the “likes” on his FB are fake....
6 posted on
05/09/2012 9:52:35 AM PDT by
geege
To: Sub-Driver
LOL! popcorn time for sure!
7 posted on
05/09/2012 9:52:43 AM PDT by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 0bie don' t eat my dog!)
To: Sub-Driver
>>I don’t think conservative women want to associate themselves with his hate<<
As usual, libs comment on Rush while never having listened to even a minute of his show. One thing Rush does NOT have is “hate.” The worst you’ll get is (appropriate) disdain.
And for the bullying now nags to accuse Rush of bullying is the ultimate in irony (and projection).
8 posted on
05/09/2012 9:53:29 AM PDT by
freedumb2003
('RETRO' Abortions = performed on 84th trimester individuals who think killing babies is a "right.")
To: Sub-Driver
"I don't think conservative women want to associate themselves with his hate. I don't think they would want to associate themselves with his bullying," O'Neill told me this morning. "I don't think conservative women would want to associate themselves with his vitriolic attacks.
True.
She "feels", which is why she's a liberal. Because if she thought...anything at all...she might wonder why liberals don't mind being associated with Bill Maher's hate, Barack Obama's bullying or Debbie Mayonnaise-Hair Schultz's vitriolic attacks. And she might not like the answer.
9 posted on
05/09/2012 9:53:36 AM PDT by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: Sub-Driver
Whatever plausible integrity NOW had, is long, long gone.
The fact that they were absolutely silent during the Clinton rape/Lewinsky scandal blew whatever credibility they had, completely and irrevocably away.
10 posted on
05/09/2012 9:53:55 AM PDT by
Hodar
( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
To: Sub-Driver
Any woman with the time and need to associate with NOW should get a life and shake the garbage out of her head.
11 posted on
05/09/2012 9:55:08 AM PDT by
pallis
To: Sub-Driver
Isn’t Rush’s FB page called....”Rush Babes for America?” typical “journalist”....can’t get the name right...or didn’t want readers flocking to it!!!
12 posted on
05/09/2012 9:55:18 AM PDT by
goodnesswins
(What has happened to America?)
To: Sub-Driver
But O'Neill said that conservative women, while they may agree with Limbaugh on matters of policy, would not support his "bullying," citing his recent attacks on Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke, who he referred to as a "slut" and a "prostitute." "I think there are extraordinarily few people who agree with what he said about Sandra Fluke," she said. "I don't think women want to watch Sandra Fluke having sex in a video tape for the sexual gratification of men." NOW is intentionally missing the intended humor, but they are right in the narrow wording they chose - no woman (or man) wants to see Fluke ever again, especially not unclothed. They're also right that Limbaugh was totally unfair to question the morals of a woman who spends thousands of dollars a year on birth control. While at the wholesale condom prices a woman that active should be sensible enough to seek, her claim equates to nearly a hundred encounters per day, it's possible that she's financially reckless and spending that much on as few as ten sessions daily. She's a parasite, but if her local WalMart is getting the money, she's not a prostitute.
13 posted on
05/09/2012 9:55:42 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(Can we afford as much government as welfare-addicted voters demand?)
To: Sub-Driver
“Free speech for me and not for thee?” That’s what they’re saying.
14 posted on
05/09/2012 9:56:22 AM PDT by
SkyDancer
("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad - Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
To: Sub-Driver
She was quoted as saying, “I don’t think...” The trouble is, conservative women do.
15 posted on
05/09/2012 9:56:33 AM PDT by
MarDav
To: Sub-Driver
Rush loves to be engaged by the whack-jobs. Now it gets fun...
To: Sub-Driver
“I don’t think conservative women want to associate themselves with his hate. I don’t think they would want to associate themselves with his bullying,” O’Neill told me this morning. “I don’t think conservative women would want to associate themselves with his vitriolic attacks.”
Fair Enough...
Then why not wait till the “Rush Babes” page fails....
...crickets....
18 posted on
05/09/2012 9:58:51 AM PDT by
GraceG
To: Sub-Driver
Hate this, Hate that. It’s just so old
19 posted on
05/09/2012 9:59:12 AM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: Sub-Driver
“Hate”? Don’t these NAGS have any new words to use? That on is kind of tired out. NAGS HATE Rush, HATE conservatives, HATE Republicans, HATE Americans, HATE marriage, HATE babies, HATE, HATE, HATE. Nothing but HATE.
20 posted on
05/09/2012 10:01:13 AM PDT by
CodeToad
To: Sub-Driver
NOW defended a serial rapist in the White House because he supported abortion on demand.
NOW defended a serial workplace sexual harasser in the White House because he supported abortion on demand.
NOW defended an administration that used the Nuts and Sluts attack strategy against sexual abuse/assault/harassment accusers because Clinton supported abortion on demand.
NOW is NOT pro-woman. They are pro-abortion and anti-choice.
21 posted on
05/09/2012 10:01:44 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Barack Obama has cut and run from what he called "the right war".)
To: Sub-Driver
P.S. The NAGS have to associate themselves to Rush as no one would know who they are otherwise, they’d get zero perss.
22 posted on
05/09/2012 10:02:24 AM PDT by
CodeToad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson