Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rising from the Ooze
The Daily Scan ^ | May 1, 2012

Posted on 05/01/2012 9:33:07 AM PDT by Pharmboy

Researchers from the University of Oslo have discovered a protozoan species that may belong to a new branch of the tree of life, says Popular Science's Rebecca Boyle.

The researchers, who describe their findings in Molecular Biology and Evolution, say they found the microorganism — called Collodictyon — in lake sludge in Norway, and that it may be related to some of the planet's earliest life forms. "It is not a fungus, alga, parasite, plant, or animal, yet it has features associated with other kingdoms of life," Boyle says. "It could be a founding member of the newest kingdom on the tree of life."

It is classified as a eukaryote, but has four flagella, unlike other organisms that have one or two flagella. "Also, the organism has the same internal structure as a parasite, but it uses amoeba-like protuberances to catch its food, which are blue-green algae," she adds. "So again, it combines features from two branches of the eukaryotes." In examining Collodictyon's genes, the researchers say that it probably evolved hundreds of millions of years ago, and has been living the same way since.


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: collodictyon; eukaryote; godsgravesglyphs; newkingdom; newlifeform; norway
Eukaryocytes of the world--unite--we have nothing to lose but our nuclear membranes!

So there IS something new under the sun (or sludge, anyway).

1 posted on 05/01/2012 9:33:14 AM PDT by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem; SunkenCiv; blam; aculeus

So, SC, is this old enough for ya, huh? It’s-all-in-the flagella, ping...


2 posted on 05/01/2012 9:35:40 AM PDT by Pharmboy (She turned me into a Newt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

...and I know a lot of Freepers will come to this post thinking it’s about the Dem’s 2012 election strategy. Surprise!


3 posted on 05/01/2012 9:37:05 AM PDT by Pharmboy (She turned me into a Newt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"researchers say that it probably evolved hundreds of millions of years ago, and has been living the same way since."

Does anyone else find that statement a bit odd? This basic, single cell life form evolved from a random collision of molecules, picked up a couple of adaptations or copied them from other early life forms, then it was just so perfect there were no other improvements needed for the next billion years. Sounds like classic soft science to me.

When I took archeology back in undergrad, fossils were dated by the depth they were buried. I always wondered how you could bury everything on earth at the same rate given the closed system we live in. I guess there could have been billions of space objects of compatible materials adding to earth's mass, but there's scant evidence of such a phenomenon.

4 posted on 05/01/2012 9:59:50 AM PDT by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

“In examining Collodictyon’s genes, the researchers say that it probably evolved hundreds of millions of years ago, and has been living the same way since.”

Well, at least one creature has found the key to happiness.


5 posted on 05/01/2012 10:02:40 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncommonsense; Black Agnes

Yes...funny you mention it, but that sentence raised a few questions for me, e.g., how did they date its origin? Did they do a DNA analysis?


6 posted on 05/01/2012 10:04:47 AM PDT by Pharmboy (She turned me into a Newt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

7 posted on 05/01/2012 10:18:25 AM PDT by reegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Doesn't sound very appetizing given the sludge thing.
8 posted on 05/01/2012 10:36:43 AM PDT by mcshot (God bless the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; decimon; 1010RD; 21twelve; 24Karet; ...

 GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks Pharmboy. This got me thinking about cleaning my house a bit more often.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.


9 posted on 05/01/2012 4:37:10 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"It is not a fungus, alga, parasite, plant, or animal..."

Is "parasite" now a kingdom? Perhaps she meant protist?

10 posted on 05/01/2012 6:04:22 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
...and I know a lot of Freepers will come to this post thinking it’s about the Dem’s 2012 election strategy. Surprise!

Never crossed my mind. The "Rising" part ruled out democrats.

11 posted on 05/01/2012 7:17:27 PM PDT by null and void (Day 1197 of our ObamaVacation from reality [and what dark chill/is gathering still/before the storm])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: uncommonsense

I thought fossils were dated not from the depth but from the layer they were found in.


12 posted on 05/01/2012 7:29:10 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy; SunkenCiv

Damn. I thought this was gonna be another salacious ‘inside scoop’ (pardon the Spoonerism) on the Secret Service/Hooker story.


13 posted on 05/01/2012 7:43:35 PM PDT by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Perhaps not....... Think Burgess Shale.

The creature may be residual


14 posted on 05/02/2012 4:37:12 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncommonsense

Did you pass the course?

Most study fossils in a geology course


15 posted on 05/02/2012 4:39:31 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bert; Sawdring
I did pass and the course was “North American Indians” in about 1981. It fell under Archeology and Anthropology as I remember.

The generally accepted artifact dating method was its depth and if available, the strata it was discovered in.

I'm a CompSci / math guy, but I had to take about 40 credit hours from multiple disciplines. This was more relevant than most so I thought.

16 posted on 05/03/2012 11:24:39 AM PDT by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson