Posted on 04/26/2012 5:09:53 AM PDT by EBH
The state of North Carolina has its own "Board of Dietetics and Nutrition"--of course it does--and it has decided that one bloggers right to free speech ends where the North Carolina Board of Dietetics and Nutrition's officious overbearingness begins, as I think Oliver Wendell Holmes (or was it Oliver Wendell Douglas?) once wrote.
Here's the naughty bits, as reported in Carolina Journal:
[When] Steve Cooksey...was hospitalized with diabetes in February 2009, he decided to avoid the fate of his grandmother, who eventually died of the disease. He embraced the low-carb, high-protein Paleo diet, also known as the “caveman” or “hunter-gatherer” diet. The diet, he said, made him drug- and insulin-free within 30 days. By May of that year, he had lost 45 pounds and decided to start a blog about his success.
But this past January the state diatetics and nutrition board decided Cooksey’s blog — Diabetes-Warrior.net — violated state law. The nutritional advice Cooksey provides on the site amounts to “practicing nutrition,” the board’s director says, and in North Carolina that’s something you need a license to do.
Unless Cooksey completely rewrites his 3-year-old blog, he could be sued by the licensing board. If he loses the lawsuit and refuses to take down the blog, he could face up to 120 days in jail.
The board’s director says Cooksey has a First Amendment right to blog about his diet, but he can’t encourage others to adopt it unless the state has certified him as a dietitian or nutritionist.
Seems he came to their attention after contradicting a local hospital's director of diabetes services at a local meeting, and handing out cards about his site. What did the Board find objectionable about Cooksey's site?
Cooksey posted a link (6.3 MB PDF download) to the board’s review of his website. The document shows several Web pages the board took issue with, including a question-and-answer page, which the director had marked in red ink noting the places he was “assessing and counseling” readers of his blog.
“If people are writing you with diabetic specific questions and you are responding, you are no longer just providing information — you are counseling,” she wrote. “You need a license to provide this service."
The board also found fault with a page titled “My Meal Plan,” where Cooksey details what he eats daily.
In red, [Dietetics and Nutrition Board director] Burril writes, “It is acceptable to provide just this information [his meal plan], but when you start recommending it directly to people you speak to or who write you, you are now providing diabetic counseling, which requires a license.”
The board also directed Cooksey to remove a link offering one-on-one support, a personal-training type of service he offered for a small fee.
Cooksey posts the following disclaimer at the bottom of every page on his website:
“I am not a doctor, dietitian, nor nutritionist … in fact I have no medical training of any kind.”
The bureaucrat speaks!
Charla Burill, the board’s director, told Carolina Journal she could not discuss the details of Cooksey’s case because his website is still under investigation, but agreed to talk about the law in the hypothetical....
Burill said [Cooksey's] disclaimer may not protect a nutrition blogger from the law.
“If I’ve given you reason to not worry that I don’t have a license because I have all these other reasons I’m an expert, you could still harm the public,” she said. “At least you’re not trying to mislead the public, but you’re trying to get the public to trust you.”....
Burill said if Cooksey refuses to come into compliance with the law, the board could file for an injunction.
The paleo diet--a passionate fad and/or lifestyle change of an enormous number of folk I know concentrated in the world's of libertarianism, futurism, space, and your basic "new digital economy" (does that still exist?) and the places where all those interests intersect--may or may not save you from diabetes, give you the pep you need, or revert you back down the evolutionary chain, or whatever it's supposed to do.
But that someone should be able to describe his experiences with it and advocate for his own good results should go without saying, though my saying that may well contradict a directive of the California Board of Going Without Saying.
The board's review of Cooksey's site. in remarkably official-looking pen scrawls in margins of a printout of the site.
Read Cooksey's site if you care to--it ain't illegal (yet).
In a previous century, I wrote about the Federal Trade Commission's power to essentially censor speech when it comes to claims about chiropraxy.
Morgellan’s syndrome.
The label of “delusional parasitosis” is an attempt by the AMA to shut the door on further research into this strange condition. The fibers that extrude from the skin of these victims is a mystery that requires more research.
Simply assuming that a group of people with delusional parasitosis who made up a disease name and started a support group (those are the facts) actually have a disease doesn't help them in any effective way. In fact by coddling their delusion their underlying problem goes untreated. Why any rational person would want this to happen is beyond me.
The “manipulation of nature” as you put it has been going on since humans first cultivated crops and raised livestock. Simply assuming that “big farming” is involved in some conspiracy and or cover up of a disease that we know was made up by a group of people with delusional parasitosis makes you sound a bit delusional. Especially when you can't even remember the name of the disease in question.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
I agree. You believe because you believe and the facts simply will not sway you. You are halfway to being a liberal if you aren’t one already.
Your brain runs on glucose like the rest of your body doesn’t it? And your body is pretty good at turning fat and protein into glucose. So I’m not seeing why a high fat and protein diet would be harmful to your brain long term.
You don’t know where I stand because you don’t listen.
Also, drinking and typing are not a good combination.
Obviously. I suggest you stop drinking, as there are actual harmul effects to driking that are scientifically valid, unlike what hippies say about "genetically modified" foods.
With Atkins or variants, there appears to come a wall of sorts, a crash that happens, when you're hit with an overwhelming desire for carbs. In my case, I was driving home from my office one evening, and it hit me like withdrawal my hands were shaking. A new KFC had just opened along the route, I wheeled into the drive through and ordered mashed potatoes with gravy. Wow, they were good.
So, it works well and is no trouble to maintain up to a poi t, then your body kicks in and takes over, lol. Low carb diets only can only go so far, imho. They're very successful up to then, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.