Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Who is this poofter who wrote this? Maybe the SS needs a leader.
2 posted on
04/24/2012 7:58:26 PM PDT by
x1stcav
(There's a bunch of us out here spoiling for a fight.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Secret Service needs more women in its racks
3 posted on
04/24/2012 7:59:45 PM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it and the law is what WE say it is.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Maybe we should just get rid of all men in all professions.
Women good. Men bad.
4 posted on
04/24/2012 8:00:09 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I suppose that way they could just boink each other instead of paying for prostitutes.
6 posted on
04/24/2012 8:02:54 PM PDT by
2111USMC
(Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Sure. Do just that.
And we’ll have the ‘Cabana Boy Scandal’ at Taxpayer Expense to deal with later, LOL!
7 posted on
04/24/2012 8:03:27 PM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Stupid, competence is the over-riding necessity. But I guess if we have an affirmative action president, we might as well promote secret service agents on the basis of race and gender.
Ernst Rohm would be proud.
8 posted on
04/24/2012 8:04:26 PM PDT by
grumpygresh
(Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
How many secret service agents that have been shot and killed have been women? If it’s less than 50% of them, perhaps we need to work to get them more represented here.
Unless you really are only for certain “gender equity” statistics.
9 posted on
04/24/2012 8:04:35 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Greater gender diversity
***************
Maybe they can get RuPaul and his drag queens.
Secret
Sodomites
10 posted on
04/24/2012 8:04:53 PM PDT by
mardi59
( Go Newt!!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The probability of the scandal happening would have been reduced significantly if there were more women on the Cartagena detail, said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.).
Yes, they wouldn’t have had to hire out.
11 posted on
04/24/2012 8:05:23 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The probability of the scandal happening would have been reduced significantly if there were more women on the Cartagena detail, said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.) He continued, "With women on the detail the men would not have to pay for sex because once you combine testosterone and estrogen, nature will take it course."
12 posted on
04/24/2012 8:05:53 PM PDT by
BushCountry
(I hope the Mayans are wrong!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What a bunch of crap! How about we only hire those that have the best attributes and abilities - how quaint, heh?
Seems that our PC overlords are controlling all these days.
Am getting really tired of the feminist overtones with government hiring.
13 posted on
04/24/2012 8:12:53 PM PDT by
Deagle
(nOT Get a)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Wasn't a woman in charge of this very unit?
(Paula) Reid, a 46-year-old black woman, tall and lean, with a reputation for being exacting and steely. The 21-year veteran of the Secret Service was recently promoted to head of the agencys Miami bureau, where she oversees the 150 agents that work throughout South America.
maybe Political correctness is part of the problem?
14 posted on
04/24/2012 8:13:28 PM PDT by
digger48
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Funny how the elites cram affirmative action down our throats but have no such thing for themselves when it's their ass on the line. Perhaps we should join in the chorus for more women agents on their front lines then see if and how much they squirm.
15 posted on
04/24/2012 8:14:48 PM PDT by
ProfoundMan
(Time to finish the Reagan Revolution! - RightyPics.com)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The only military personnel I see getting pregnant are the women.
16 posted on
04/24/2012 8:15:33 PM PDT by
Eaker
(When somebody hands you your arse, don't give it back saying "This needs a little more tenderizing.")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Women? No way! That brings into play a whole different set of problems. I say go with the Oriental solution - eunuchs!
Nos genuflectitur ad non princeps sed Princeps Pacem!
Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)
17 posted on
04/24/2012 8:15:34 PM PDT by
ConorMacNessa
(HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Maloney and Jackson Lee. Proof that we need more men in Congress.
19 posted on
04/24/2012 8:16:51 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(It's time for the 47% to start paying their "fair share" of income taxes.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I say it’s entirely Obama’s fault. If he had hired more gay Secret Service men, this never would have happened!
20 posted on
04/24/2012 8:16:56 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Secret Service needs more women in its pranks.
22 posted on
04/24/2012 8:17:30 PM PDT by
bunkerhill7
(duhhhh????! Who knew?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows
What, male hookers need government business too?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What we really need to do is to only allow married women to vote. Single women tend to be wealth redistributionists. They want Gov’t to be their husband (sugar daddy) and the Democrats are happy to cater to them and get them affirmative action of all sorts. Welfare too for numerous out of wedlock kiddies
Then the Democrats would have a hard time winning elections.
29 posted on
04/24/2012 8:23:55 PM PDT by
dennisw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson