To: greyfoxx39; Jim Robinson
Do you doubt that the DNC would use any method or media to divert votes from the GOP nominee, no matter who it might be? I don't.
That is not an endorsement of romney - it is a statement that the DNC would stoop to any level to secure a second obama term.
180 posted on
04/24/2012 12:41:01 PM PDT by
wtc911
(Amigo - you've been had.)
To: wtc911
it is a statement that the DNC would stoop to any level to secure a second obama term. They don't have to. They have the RNC pushing a liberal that conservatives won't vote for. And pulling dirty tricks, and changing rules, and bad-mouthing conservatives.
No thanks. I will never vote for any liberal, especially a liberal with (R) beside his name.
I don't believe in rewarding bad behavior. And anyone that votes for Romney, ever, is rewarding the GOP for pushing a liberal.
/johnny
To: wtc911
it is a statement that the DNC would stoop to any level to secure a second obama term.
_______________________________________
Such as making sure they saddle us with the useless liberal Willard Mitt Romney
188 posted on
04/24/2012 1:02:00 PM PDT by
Tennessee Nana
(Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
To: wtc911
That is no excuse for making accusations against other FReepers like this:
"I beieve that there are nominal freepers who are here in the pay of the DNC to create the notion that romney=obama. THAT "is a statement that the DNC would stoop to", and you make it in attempting to smear other FReepers to aid Romney.
You do your argument no good with this kind of tactic.
192 posted on
04/24/2012 1:24:54 PM PDT by
greyfoxx39
(I do not expect the (FR) house to fall - but I do expect it will cease to be divided-Jim Robinson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson