Posted on 04/24/2012 8:24:10 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
Provided courtesy of DefendtheNaturalFamily.com
Joel McDurmon
MetroWeekly.com is exposing the whole truth that Washington Post would not reveal:
Mitt Romney’s campaign tonight announced that it has hired Richard Grenell, an out gay former George W. Bush administration official, to serve as the presumptive Republican presidential nominee’s “national security and foreign policy spokesman,” according to a report from The Washington Post that did not mention Grenell’s sexual orientation.
Grenell served through September 2008 in the Bush administration as a spokesman to the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations — and told The Advocate‘s Kerry Eleveld as he left the administration that it was his hope that New York would have marriage equality soon and that he would one day be able to marry his partner, Matt Lashey. The couple has been together 10 years. . . .
Andrew Sullivan, who had endorsed Obama’s 2008 run, wrote of the news, “For Romney to have an openly gay spokesman is a real outreach to gay Republicans, a subtle signal to moderates, and the Santorum faction’s reaction will be worth noting.”
Grenell is not just gay, but a gay activist who pushes for same-sex marriages.
At the end of Grenell’s service in the Bush administration, he took a notable whack at the administration, telling The Advocate‘s Kerry Eleveld of his effort to have his partner, Matt Lashey, listed in the United Nations’ Blue Book, which is “a reference guide of contact information for different member states of the United Nations as well as diplomatic personnel and their spouses.”
Grenell had attempted to have Lashey’s name added several times, to no avail. He told The Advocate back in 2008, “What put me over the edge was a friend and colleague who met her spouse after I was already with my partner — they got married and subsequently were put into the Blue Book in a matter of days.”
The State Department eventually told him that the Defense of Marriage Act prevented the listing. Although he protested the decision behind the scenes, Lashey’s name was not ever added, which led to his coming forward to criticize the treatement publicly as he left his post.
HuffPost has noted that since the choice, Grenell has scrubbed his Twitter account and website of offensive material...
Read this story at americanvisionnews.com ...
In the beginning, they said all they wanted was tolerance. We made the mistake of giving it to them. Now, they're invading every aspect of everyone elses life.
All the welfare people wanted during the depression was a little work, a little food and a little cover. Now, half of everyones paycheck is stolen by some tax or government fee to pay for everything their little lazy hearts desire.
When we give the left an inch, personal liberty loses miles. That's why these things have to be stopped before they start. There's always a bad, bad consequence to anything liberal. That's why their agenda has to be defeated, and coddling it or protecting it doesn't help.
Headquarters??
We may need to update this stuff!!
"All of this should be conveyed without having priesthood leaders focus upon intimate matters which are a part of husband and wife relationships. Skillful interviewing and counseling can occur without discussion of clinical details by placing firm responsibility on individual members of the Church to put their lives in order before exercising the privilege of entering a house of the Lord. The First Presidency has interpreted oral sex as constituting an unnatural, impure, or unholy practice. If a person is engaged in a practice which troubles him enough to ask about it, he should discontinue it."
- Official Declaration of the First Presidency of the Church, January 5th, 1982
"Among the most common sexual sins our young people commit are necking and petting. Not only do these improper relations often lead to fornication, [unwed] pregnancy, and abortions - all ugly sins - but in and of themselves they are pernicious evils, and it is often difficult for youth to distinguish where one ends and another begins. They awaken lust and stir evil thoughts and sex desires. They are but parts of the whole family of related sins and indiscretions. Almost like twins, 'petting' and fornication are alike."
- Prophet Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness, page 65
"Also far-reaching is the effect of the loss of chastity. Once given or taken or stolen it can never be regained. Even in a forced contact such as rape or incest, the injured one is greatly outraged. If she has not cooperated and contributed to the foul deed, she is of course in a more favorable position. There is no condemnation where there is no voluntary participation. It is better to die in defending one's virtue than to live having lost it without a struggle."
- Prophet Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness, page 196
"And Cain said unto the Lord, My punishment is greater than I can bear. Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth." (Genesis 4:9-14.) That was true of murder. It is also true of illicit sex, which, of course, includes all petting, fornication, adultery, homosexual acts, and all other perversions. The Lord may say to offenders, as He did to Cain, "What hast thou done?" The children thus conceived make damning charges against you; the companions who have been frustrated and violated condemn you; the body that has been defiled cries out against you; the spirit which has been dwarfed convicts you. You will have difficulty throughout the ages in totally forgiving yourself."
-Prophet Spencer W. Kimball, "Love Versus Lust", BYU Speech January 5, 1965. Often-used quote still used today in LDS seminary classes.
"I do not find in the Bible the modern terms "petting" nor "homosexuality," yet I found numerous scriptures which forbade such acts under by whatever names they might be called. I could not find the term "homosexuality," but I did find numerous places where the Lord condemned such a practice with such vigor that even the death penalty was assessed."
- Apostle Spencer W. Kimball, "Love Versus Lust", BYU Speech January 5, 1965
"If adultery or fornication justified the death penalty in the old days, and still in Christ's day, is the sin any less today because the laws of the land do not assess the death penalty for it? Is the act less grievous? There must be a washing, a purging, a changing of attitudes, a correcting of appraisals, a strengthening toward self-mastery. There must be many prayers, and volumes of tears. There must be an inner conviction giving to the sin its full diabolical weight. There must be increased devotion and much thought and study. And this takes energy and time and often is accompanied with sore embarrassment, heavy deprivations and deep trials, even if indeed one is not excommunicated from the Church, losing all spiritual blessings."
-Prophet Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness, Page 155
"How like the mistletoe is immorality. The killer plant starts with a sticky sweet berry. Little indiscretions are the berries -- indiscretions like sex thoughts sex discussions, passionate kissing, pornography. The leaves and little twigs are masturbation and necking and such, growing with every exercise. The full-grown plant is petting and sex looseness. It confounds, frustrates, and destroys like the parasite if it is not cut out and destroyed, for, in time it robs the tree, bleeds its life, and leaves it barren and dry; and, strangely enough, the parasite dies with its host."
- Apostle Spencer W. Kimball, General Conference Address, April 1, 1967.
How many did Gideon have?
Bye
Wow, you have to ping all your friends to come pile on the fight?
If you read anything I wrote you would know I dont agree with the homosexual lifestyle at all.
Tell you what, I change my mind, lets just shoot them all.
If a person kicks their dog every day in their private life, do you have a right to be appalled by that and decide that the person’s character is poor and therefor you don’t want to hire them?
SOMEbody make an E-a-S teleprompter!
How I miss the MARQUEE command in the old HTML!
I pinged a handful, not even close to the whole list.
If you read anything I wrote you would know I dont agree with the homosexual lifestyle at all.
Yet you compare those of us who actual do oppose the homosexual agenda to a lynch mob.
Tell you what, I change my mind, lets just shoot them all.
How about you just go back to your anti-FReeper site with the other trolls?
Note my tag. That’s what I’m going to do - and I refuse to accept the blame for one liberal losing to another. I haven’t left the party, the party left me.
That upsets me, too, when it happens...
To be honest, I find the gay people I know, to be really nice, decent people. And while I don’t approve of their “choice” (even though they argue it’s not a choice)...as long as they keep it to themselves and know where I stand on it...it’s all good.
That said, I can’t help but feel sorry for them, in their “choice”. All I can do is pray for them. But I certainly wouldn’t de-friend them. I mean, WWJD, after all, right?
An oxymoronic statement if I have ever seen one. You note that he has an agenda, but will do nothing to oppose it, as if ignoring it, it will go away.
As hard as I looked in 1950's I never once ran across a gay marriage. When I was in the Navy it was well understood that homosexuals were not welcome among the crew, so they had first dibs on the little room, with bars, commonly called the brig. I do notice a little change in that area, since we now have gay home comings.
Tell ME how it AIN'T!
What I am espousing is that some lib article author is laughing his ass off at how his article is making conservatives focus on in-fighting rather than the Obama disaster.
I dont support gay rights, I support individual rights. I dont approve of gay lifestyle, but its up to God to judge, not me, and not the govt, so long as no one else’s rights are violated.
What part of the CONSTITUTION is being disregarded?
What LAW is being broken?
“And that makes it three against a few million, so we win!”
I’m beginning to get the feeling there will be MANY more than our four Palin write-in votes...
jagusafr
I don’t know about being able to “guarantee” anything.
He has been described as an activist who has fought for the new definition of marriage.
The article also stated he has scrubbed his twitter account of offensive material.
So my main question is...why would Romney consider such a person?
He is trying to make a statement.
Surely - there must be qualified candidates who do not need to scrub their accounts of offensive material?
This is about Romney sending a message.
Bully for him.
I’ve had it - I’m done.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.