It seems that the only way people who are “Racist” can ‘win’ an argument, in by injecting race into the argument.
A person lives in a community, and is a part of the coumminty watch. On his rounds, he is legally armed with a sidearm, which is is authorized to carry. He spies an individual acting ‘unusual’ and proceeds to follow this person, he calls 911 and reports this individual.
He is attacked, has his head pounded against the sidewalk, and uses his sidearm to defend his life, thus killing the attacker.
Those are the basic facts. The fact that the attacker is Black, and the ‘victim’ is hispanic are really unimportant. My view wouldn’t change, no matter what the racial background of the characters were. One person was a champion for good, the other a champion of evil.
This is exactly what the charge of “racist” is about these days - silencing speech that is truth, oppositional and exposes the left.
Time to laugh at the charges of both “racism” and “McCarthyism”.
The left needs to be hung with their communist sympathies and have to deal with defending them.
He wasn't "on his rounds." He was on his way to Target and happened to spot Trayvon.
“One person was a champion for good, the other a champion of evil.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Jackson, Sharpton and all the dingy left wing nuts would agree with you on that, the only disagreement is about which was which.