[SWAMPSNIPER]

If Botox Nan wants it you can bet the CPUSA wants it.

[TLI]

to ratify an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would allow Congress to regulate political speech when it is engaged in by corporations as opposed to individuals."

First thing that comes to mind is The Heritage Foundation.

Governed by an independent Board of Trustees, The Heritage Foundation is an independent, tax-exempt institution. Heritage relies on the private financial support of the general public—individuals, foundations, and corporations—for its income, and accepts no government funds and performs no contract work. Heritage is one of the nation’s largest public policy research organizations. More than 710,000 individual members make it the most broadly supported think tank in America.

The Heritage Foundation is the nation’s most broadly supported public policy research institute, with nearly 700,000 individual, foundation and corporate donors. Heritage, founded in February 1973, has a staff of 255 and an annual expense budget of $75.3 million.

Our mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.

Then they will attack the churches.

.

[cardinal4]

Man this woman sucks..

[rurgan]

How could any one be a democrat and vote for democrat Nancy Pelosi?

This is just 1 more example why democrats are statists/socialists. Why do democrats trust government to do everything and control everything even our speech?

[The Great RJ]

If Pelosi and Obama had their way the USA would be just like East Germany including a secret police who spy on everyone looking for anyone who might say something against the government.

[drwoof]

The introduction of such notions to The People via the media is fundamental to attainment of the ultimate goal. While there is far, far too much money involved in politics (from all sources, but in many cases, largely unions, etc.), a revision to “improve” our Constitution's First (and possibly most vital) Amendment would in all probability serve only to make matters much worse. However, if a leader of our Congress suggests that such a dramatic solution should be considered a valid, reasonable response to a timeless problem, The People will be numbed, and finally, unresponsive, when the End Game begins. Ms. Pelosi’s spew is not hysterical or idiotic; it is cool and very purposeful.

[tanknetter]

I, obviously, have a major problem with the idea that the First Amendment should, let alone needs to, be amended in such away. And if it were to start moving I’d oppose it with all my heart.

HOWEVER, I really do have to give SanFranNan props here in that, in the twilight of her political career, she’s FINALLY woken up and realized that this sort of thing can ONLY be done through a Constitutional Amendment ... rather than Act of Congress, Presidential fiat/Executive Order and/or ruling by activist judges.

So I’m willing to give credit where credit is due. Too bad she and her fellow travellers didn’t reach this conclusion earlier. Like 40 years ago.

[geologist]

NO! NO! NO!

NEVER!

[The Sons of Liberty]

Is SanFran Nan afraid some big bad company is going to disagree with Hussein and her communist tactics?

[Chgogal]

Madame you are an idiot and represent all Dummycrats. It is obvious that you have no understanding of America's history and the importance and meaning of the US Constitution. It IS obvious that you have a better understanding of the Communist Manifesto.

You, Madame should be tarred, feathered, hung and then quartered for TREASON (not upholding the US Constitution).

[2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten]

In the words of Spongebob, “See you next Tuesday” San Fran Nan.

[hattend]

Term limits first.

[Joe Boucher]

It’s really too bad,
We use to “dunk” witches like pelosi.
A grand tradition that should be returned.
That and Keel Hauling which also is good for sea hags like her.