To: blam
Could that mean that the genes for resistance to antibiotics were always there?
3 posted on
04/12/2012 5:45:54 PM PDT by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
To: Westbrook
it depends if they were Levi’s or Wranglers.
5 posted on
04/12/2012 5:48:45 PM PDT by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: Westbrook
Could that mean that the genes for resistance to antibiotics were always there? If was say that it was, then we can't blame it on people for using antibiotics, so no.
6 posted on
04/12/2012 5:48:45 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Over half of U.S. murders are of black people, and 90% of them are committed by other black people.)
To: Westbrook
I think the suggestion is that there are natural antibiotics out there that have caused resistance in these bacteria. This is a good thing because it means that we can “discover” more naturally occurring antibiotics that may be beneficial.
9 posted on
04/12/2012 5:58:22 PM PDT by
outofstyle
(Down All the Days)
To: Westbrook
If true it means they will be weaponized in short order. There are just too many people, they are giving Al’s planet a fever.
10 posted on
04/12/2012 5:59:30 PM PDT by
itsahoot
(I will not vote for Romney period, and by election day you won't like him either.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson