Norks getting ready to rumble? Heads up, Japan, and good shooting.
1 posted on
04/12/2012 6:41:15 AM PDT by
Semper911
To: Semper911
I’d say so. I don’t think they can unload the fuel and back down. Good shooting guys!
2 posted on
04/12/2012 6:45:54 AM PDT by
battlecry
To: Semper911
It would be nice to see the thing “blowed up real good”.
3 posted on
04/12/2012 6:48:20 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(Patience is not a virtue, it is a waste of time.)
To: Semper911
Why am I picturing a powerful laser from space or the nose of a high flying aircraft focused on the fueling line?
Probably can’t be done, but if they have an accident while fueling I can guarantee one will be photoshopped into the NorKs news feed within minutes to explain how it burned on the pad.
4 posted on
04/12/2012 6:50:03 AM PDT by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: Semper911
It will be interesting to hear Obama’s comment in the event Japan knocks this missile down, now that he's eviscerated our own SDI program.
5 posted on
04/12/2012 6:50:30 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: Semper911
More tests on the joint NorK/Iran EMP weapon. My opinion.
6 posted on
04/12/2012 6:52:43 AM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(I will vote against ANY presidential candidate who had non-citizen parents.)
To: Semper911
The USA could have an Aegis ship equipped with SM-3s that reach out and touch someone!
8 posted on
04/12/2012 6:55:08 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: Semper911
You know, fueling is a dangerous operation, and accidents happen. There was a time that such accidents would happen because it was the best thing for humanity.
Maybe they were arranged by freedom loving nations, maybe they were acts of God. Just sayin'
I would find it hard to find any sympathy if an accident were to happen during the fueling.
12 posted on
04/12/2012 6:58:31 AM PDT by
Never on my watch
(I'd rather light a candle than curse the flatulence.)
To: Semper911
What’s the over/under on how high it lifts off before blowing up??? I’ll take 25000 feet for a buck.
15 posted on
04/12/2012 7:09:22 AM PDT by
6ppc
(It's torch and pitchfork time)
To: Semper911
What’s the over/under on how high it lifts off before blowing up??? I’ll take 25000 feet for a buck.
16 posted on
04/12/2012 7:09:36 AM PDT by
6ppc
(It's torch and pitchfork time)
To: Semper911
The North Koreans never tire of being the *ssclowns of Planet Earth.
To: Semper911
Another international punk sticking a finger in our eye.
Don't they know that Obama killed Osama?
22 posted on
04/12/2012 7:56:28 AM PDT by
AU72
To: Semper911
Wouldn't it be interesting if the US was able to place stealthy nuke-powered drones, armed with SM-3 AEGIS BMD interceptors, flying randomized lazy 8's at extreme altitude over the ocean near the battle theater? Of course, they'd need to be networked and heavily encrypted - communicating infrequently and in bursts at "randomized/synced" frequencies, but with a bit of AI built in, in case the network was jammed.
Then have a fleet of not-so stealthy decoys, that we let the enemy "discover" and then allow them to "find" an exploit that they believe would take out the drones...
Any way, if I was running the show...
26 posted on
04/12/2012 10:02:23 AM PDT by
dadgum
(Overjoyed to be the Pariah.)
To: Semper911
27 posted on
04/12/2012 1:04:35 PM PDT by
mulder1
("The past is prologue.")
To: Semper911
That's a funny looking rocket!
5....4....3....2....
29 posted on
04/12/2012 2:33:07 PM PDT by
MarineBrat
(Better dead than red!)
To: Semper911
Launch the damn thing already. To hell with this suspense.
To: Semper911
The rocket has already been fired, according to breaking news from Fox
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
