Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jacknhoo

Whenever race is injected to describe what appears to be an unconstitutional act of deadly force, where the color of the victim shouldn’t matter, it is race-baiting and like bees to honey, the Sharptons, Jacksons, and their backers come in to make political hay and use the occasions for fund raising and line their pockets in the process.


13 posted on 03/25/2012 12:43:22 PM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Steelfish
You have determined beyond a reasonable doubt that this incident was an unconstitutional act of deadly force?
16 posted on 03/25/2012 12:45:39 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Ummmm, an “act deadly force” justified or unjustified, has nothing at all to do with the US Constitution, as felonies are determined by state and local law.

An unconstitutional “act of deadly force” would describe the FBI accidently raiding your house and shooting you without a warrant.

Individuals, almost by definition, don’t do “unconstituional” things, the government does. Individuals do however do unlawful things. Whether that describes Trayvon or Zimmerman, is, constitutionally....up to the courts, not Jesse Jackson, CNN, Obama, or the Black Panthers to pre-judge.

That’s what’s so terrifying about this whole thing—no one really knows what happened yet, and Zimmerman REALLY needs to be considered “innocent until proven guilty”...constitutionally.

It’s inexcusable that folks are picking sides here...all because the color of their skin.


401 posted on 03/25/2012 8:08:38 PM PDT by AnalogReigns (because REALITY is never digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson