Posted on 03/25/2012 12:30:48 PM PDT by Steelfish
Due Process clause?
Not applicable here, FRiend.
As for the victim helping the perp, why would anyone render aid to someone who they had to shoot in self defense?
Once you have the victim subdued, you cannot use deadly force.
Oh, but it is considered race baiting to take up for an innocent black man, apparently.
Right this is not some Good old hallmark channel movie of the week I think i would have pop a cap in is ass just for extra measure
Mary Cutcher told Dateline that she and her roommate both saw Zimmerman “straddling the body, basically a foot on both sides of Trayvon’s body, and his hands pressed on his back.”
Contradicts your version, does it not?
And you’re sure he’s innocent...because?
Good, I'll say so.
For all those people possessing perfect clairvoyant powers, the use of deadly force to repel a non-deadly attack is wrong.
For the rest of us, not possessing any superhuman powers of perception, if you find yourself on the ground being pummeled by a maniac, with absolutely no way to know what his ultimate intention is - blow the M_F_ away and let lawyers sort it out. Better to be defended by one than carried by six.
I think expecting Zimmerman to give aid to Martin, under the circumstances, is unreasonable. Zimmerman was probably in a state of shock and he’s not a professional.
If I had been Zimmerman, it probably wouldn’t even have crossed my mind.
I’ve heard reports that Trayvon had Zimmerman pinned to the ground. I mean, how else could you explain the grass stains on the back of his shirt and the bloodied face?
I heard the 911 call. Sounded to me like Zimmerman should have done what the dispatcher said.
Whenever race is injected to describe what appears to be an unconstitutional act of deadly force, where the color of the victim shouldn’t matter, it is race-baiting and like bees to honey, the Sharptons, Jacksons, and their backers come in to make political hay and use the occasions for fund raising and line their pockets in the process.
Really? Florida is not an open carry state, and Zimmerman would have been breaking the law to open display his weapon.
I don't believe a single word in the article. As far as I am concerned, if one part of it is rotten, it all stinks.
“Oh, but it is considered race baiting to take up for an innocent black man, apparently.”
Reading your posts in this thread and the other one sure make my blood pressure go up. Has nothing to do with race baiting or anything else except the facts. Lets have “all” the facts then pass judgment. I despise people who play the race card.
Maybe if you’d have been there to tell Zimmerman that he was getting pummeled but it wouldn’t be a deadly pummeling the this could have been prevented.
Conservatives be smart. Liberals want to draw us in and blame us. Respond by saying this is a Latino vs Black affair. They should resolve this with their political and legal forces. All non Latinos and non Blacks keep out of it. In other words, be the monkey on the rock watching two lions fight.
“I heard the 911 call. Sounded to me like Zimmerman should have done what the dispatcher said.”
And the Japanese shouldn’t have bombed Pearl Harbor.
Let's be reasonable about this and let Al Sharpton decide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.