Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum Suggests Obama Preferable to "Etch-A-Sketch" Romney.
latimes.com ^ | March 22, 2012 | Michael A. Memoli

Posted on 03/22/2012 6:27:59 PM PDT by true believer forever

Rick Santorum's latest attempt to use a Mitt Romney aide's "Etch-A-Sketch" remark against the Republican front-runner instead gave his rival a chance to fire back on Thursday, after Santorum seemed to say he'd rather see President Obama reelected than send Romney to the White House.

Speaking at an event in Texas, Santorum again made the case that Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom's comments Wednesday on CNN about a "reset" of the campaign if Romney clinched the nomination showed the former Massachusetts governor's efforts to appeal to conservatives were insincere.

"You win by giving people the opportunity to see a different vision for our country, not someone who's just going to be a little different than the person in there," Santorum told a crowd in San Antonio, according to NBC News. "If you're going to be a little different, we might as well stay with what we have instead of taking a risk with what may be the Etch-A-Sketch candidate of the future."

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bidensantorum; deathoftheteaparty; election; emptyvest; fubo; fumr; fung; furs; getthehelloutnewt; helenthomasissexy; identitypolitics; idolatry; kenyanbornmuzzie; liars4mitt; liars4newt; mittbots; mittromney; mittusedbyobama; newt4philandery; newt4romney; newt4teaparty; newtgingrich; newtvsconservatives; nextstopobscurity; noideas; nomessage; novision; obama; obama4romney; obamabinbiden; palin4mccain; palin4newt; posromney; rickisusedbygope; rickisusedbymitt; ricksantorum; rickscrewedteaparty; romney4obamacare; romneyantifederalism; romneyantigop; romneyantiteaparty; romneywillgetcrushed; santorum; santorum4obama; santorumgaffes; santorumvsteaparty; sarah4mccain; sarah4newt; slickrick; stopexcusingrick; stopexecusingmitt; stupidparty; teaparty; teaparty4newt; weakfrontrunner; whatanidiot; whatasnob; whenindoubtblamenewt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 761-762 next last
To: Williams

See sweetie Romney’s speech don’t mean anything because he takes all sides of every issue, it is what he does and who he is.
Romney can say he is a conservative all he wants, his record says differently.
He is not now or had he ever been a conservative.
He is a supporter of gun grabs
He is a support of abortion
He is a supporter of homosexual agenda
He is a supporter of working with democrats
He is a supporter of man made global warming
And that’s just a start of his not conservative life.......
I do get it is appears that you really want him to be a conservative, he isn’t and he never will be, it is not who he is.
Romney’s core is liberalism, that is who he is.


561 posted on 03/23/2012 8:13:29 AM PDT by svcw (CLEAN WATER & Education http://www.longlostsis.com/PI/MayanHelp2012.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator; Lucas McCain; dfwgator
I am not going to change my principles and vote for that creep. It is not our fault that the GOPe wants him to be the nominee. They can have him. I am writing in Santorum, Palin, Cain, or Bachmann. I have not decided which yet, but I will before November.

That's insane. Look, folks: Politics is a dirty filthy game but at this level it's literally life and death for the nation. You sound like a little kid stamping his foot and threatening to hold his breath until DEATH unless he get's his "way." Life isn't fair and our system might not be the best, but it's the best in the world until Christ returns. You fight like mad for your candidate but if the country chooses somebody else, you have to rally around the candidate and hope that a conservative Congress keeps him in check. Because the alternative for your "principles" will leave all our kids at slavery's door. The same "principles" made the folks who built the atomic bomb dig in their heels and refuse to finish because Germany surrendered and thus the real threat to the world was gone. They were against nuking Japan. Had that threat stood, a MILLION men would have been killed invading the Japanese homeland. Among them, my late father in law and thus my wife might not ever have been born! Imagine the lives altered irrevocably over political principles that really boil down to pettiness. All it takes for evil to succeed is that good men stand around and do nothing. Not an exact quote but close enough. Sound familiar? It should.

562 posted on 03/23/2012 8:15:44 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Stand up and be counted... OR LINE UP AND BE NUMBERED...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Yankee

Exactly!


563 posted on 03/23/2012 8:22:49 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: delapaz

Either choice requires us to own Congress.


564 posted on 03/23/2012 8:24:16 AM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: swpa_mom

““It is very possible that Romney winning the election will do more damage to the Republican party than Obama winning reelection.”

I remember the 2008 fiasco, where so many claimed that Obama winning would be good for the republican party, it would, somehow, teach the party a lesson. Good people backed a candidate and only that candidate. when that candidate failed to gain any traction, the good people supporting him claimed they would rather have Obama in office than a rino, they would rather have the republican party in tatters than have that rino in office. That particular rino not receiving support did not vote for nor support Obamacare. Of course, we have a different rino this time. But, so many are only supporting candidate X, no matter what. If that person isn’t the nominee, well, there’s no use voting, right? Supreme court nominations no longer seem to matter, right?”

The quote at the top isn’t my words. In fact, it’s the opposite of my opinion.


565 posted on 03/23/2012 8:24:46 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Consider who Romney appointed as judges when he was governor. I expect the same pattern to be followed, why do you think he’ll change now?

He appointed Democrats, liberals, progressives, and activists when he was governor.

And he definitely abused executive power, the “gay marriage” issue, then he forced Roman Catholic hospitals to dispense birth control and abortificants. He recently lied about this and said the church did this voluntarily, as though the bishop would ignore church teachings on his own.

Support for the military? Remember his answer to the question “Have any of your sons served the country in the military?” His answer was, “They are serving their country right now by working on my campaign!”

Romney has signed into law more gun bans than Obama has.

Romney’s support for illegal immigration reform involved hiring illegals to work on his grounds, then lying about it when caught, after which he continued to hire them. Plus there is his tacit support for the many “sanctuary cities” in MA, he did nothing at all about them.

This is exactly what I’m worried about, Republicans supporting him wholeheartedly when he starts to pull this stuff at the national level. The same people who would support Romney would stiffly oppose Obama.


566 posted on 03/23/2012 8:25:43 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: Lucas McCain

Thank you.

He mentions LDS and all I can think of is how much LSD he must be on to come up with that.


567 posted on 03/23/2012 8:28:26 AM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

My sarcastic comment, as I am sure you recognized, was simply to point out that there is a drastic difference between candidates who support America and her Constitution and the foreign cabal that is running the White House at present.

One’s flavor of Christianity seems like a straw man argument when what we really need to dig at is will the candidate at least respect our values and the Constitution.


568 posted on 03/23/2012 8:30:49 AM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Califelephant

Santorum supported Arlen Sphincter. He lost his last election in PA to a halfwit imbecile name bob Casey Jr. by 17 points. The more you get to know him the less you like him. The longer he makes an ass of himself in this race the less chance he has to run in the future.


569 posted on 03/23/2012 8:34:40 AM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator; Lucas McCain; dfwgator
I am not going to change my principles and vote for that creep. It is not our fault that the GOPe wants him to be the nominee. They can have him. I am writing in Santorum, Palin, Cain, or Bachmann. I have not decided which yet, but I will before November.

That's insane. Look, folks: Politics is a dirty filthy game but at this level it's literally life and death for the nation. You sound like a little kid stamping his foot and threatening to hold his breath until DEATH unless he get's his "way." Life isn't fair and our system might not be the best, but it's the best in the world until Christ returns. You fight like mad for your candidate but if the country chooses somebody else, you have to rally around the candidate and hope that a conservative Congress keeps him in check. Because the alternative for your "principles" will leave all our kids at slavery's door. The same "principles" made the folks who built the atomic bomb dig in their heels and refuse to finish because Germany surrendered and thus the real threat to the world was gone. They were against nuking Japan. Had that threat stood, a MILLION men would have been killed invading the Japanese homeland. Among them, my late father in law and thus my wife might not ever have been born! Imagine the lives altered irrevocably over political principles that really boil down to pettiness. All it takes for evil to succeed is that good men stand around and do nothing. Not an exact quote but close enough. Sound familiar? It should.

570 posted on 03/23/2012 8:34:58 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Stand up and be counted... OR LINE UP AND BE NUMBERED...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Here is the difference between Romney and Obama.

Obama is a blatant socialist, which means it is easier to forment opposition to his socialist policies.

Romney is stealth socialist, who will sugar-coat his socialism to force it down our throats....which makes it more likely under a Romney Administration we would become even more socialist, than even under Obama.


Then vote for obama.


571 posted on 03/23/2012 8:43:20 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JAKraig; reaganaut; greyfoxx39
The Mormon church is baptizing a quarter million new members a year and bring more that that in as children.

How many are they retaining?

Reuters: ...census data from some foreign countries...show that the retention rate for their [Mormon] converts is as low as 25 percent. (2012 Source #3 below)

That add up to about 5% growth a year. There may be people leaving the Mormons but there are a lot more joining.

Sorry...that wasn't the spin put on Mormon stats by the 16th-ranked Lds general authority earlier this year...[he was so frank, the Mormon hierarchy forced him into early retirement]

Here's three 2012 sources [your 5% is already outdated]:
2012 Source #1: Number of faithful Mormons rapidly declining
2012 Source #2: Mormons opening up in an Internet world [& Losing members accordingly]
2012 Source #3: Special report -Mormonism besieged by the modern age [Lds church is hemorrhaging in member losses]

Quotes from Mormon General Authority Marlin K. Jensen, who was #16-ranked General Authority when he said them earlier this year – but was booted into retirement because of these disclosures:

1. Did the leaders...know that members are "leaving in droves?" a woman asked. "We are aware," said Jensen, according to a tape recording of his unscripted remarks. "And I'm speaking of the 15 men that are above me in the hierarchy of the church."... (2012 Source #3 above)

2. “Attrition has ACCELERATED in the last five years (2012 Source #1 above) He told Reuters there have been MORE attrition over the last five or ten years..."I think we are at a time of challenge," he told Reuters... (2012 Source #2 above)

3. How serious is this "attrition?" Not since...the 1837 failure of a church bank in Kirtland, Ohio, have so many left the church, Jensen said. "Maybe since Kirtland, we've never had a period of - I'll call it apostasy, like we're having NOW," he told the group in Logan. (2012 Source #3 above)

4. John Dehlin...executive director of the Open Stories Foundation. The foundation conducted a survey that Dehlin said suggests disaffections have trended upward the last three to six years...like Peterson and Bushman, Dehlin said the number of people contacting him about having doubts has "grown exponentially." (2012 Source #2 above)

Face it, JA: %-wise, More Mormons have apostasized in the last 3-6/5-10 years than over the previous 175 years!

When I was a little boy about 3 or 4 years old my father asked me if I did something. I told him no, I lied, I did it and he knew I did it. Dads always seem to know that kind of stuff when you are little. Anyway, my father told me that telling a lie was a really stupid thing. He said that no matter how many times I told the truth when someone caught me lying they would always think of me as a liar.

Based upon the above -- your indirect labeling of Reaganaut as a "liar" -- be a man and apologize. Based upon the sources, you're not only wrong, but now you're falsely slandering and castigating others in public...which is a sin. Repent!

572 posted on 03/23/2012 8:46:48 AM PDT by Colofornian ( Tell us: Why do we want to vote for ONE socialist to defeat ANOTHER socialist again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
Sorry for the triple post. Extremely slow computer situation today.
573 posted on 03/23/2012 8:46:57 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Stand up and be counted... OR LINE UP AND BE NUMBERED...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Aside from the MittRick debate... Etch-a-Sketch??? Must we keep using stereotypical "grandpa" cultural references that people under 40 have never even heard of?

Since both of my 19- and 21-year-old children had Etch-a-Sketches when they were younger and, I'm sure a lot of their contemporaries did, too, I think your point is completely invalid.

Oh, and they're also familiar with the I Love Lucy chocolate episode. (Yes, our kids had some quality time with us—and their grandparents—and TVLand. :)

574 posted on 03/23/2012 8:47:37 AM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: swpa_mom

I remember the 2008 fiasco, where so many claimed that Obama winning would be good for the republican party, it would, somehow, teach the party a lesson.


And many in here are still saying it and want another 4 more years of obama.


575 posted on 03/23/2012 8:51:00 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Between barbs like this and the “I Love Lucy” chocolate Episode reference, is there anything else our guys can do to seem even more out of touch with the 21st century?


Kids these days are into video games. Maybe we could create a conservative video game.
I’m sure that would pull in the younger x/y/m generation.
Or, perhaps we could hand out free pocket Constitutions with a condom inside?
Or, a conservative rap song.
Show them we are hip or cool or extreme or like whatever.
:)
Like ya know.


576 posted on 03/23/2012 8:51:16 AM PDT by Leep (Dueling tag lines=don't worry,you'll be a vegetable guy soon<>It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: BobL

You can say that, and that does seem to be the theme here, but we’ll never know, as Romney will likely get the nomination, and the conservatives will stay home while Obama hands him his head.


And then they will be in here pissing and moaning that obama won.


577 posted on 03/23/2012 8:55:10 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

But those that remember the etch-a-sketch vote.


578 posted on 03/23/2012 9:00:02 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

For me it depends on what kind of campaign Romney runs. If he runs as a lefty or moderate then yeah I won’t vote for him. But if he runs as a conservative then he may be able to drag me out to vote for him.

The problem with him is no one knows what he truly believes. if he gets the nominee I think we’ll have a good clue if he was lying this time or not.


579 posted on 03/23/2012 9:04:18 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

romney’s aides started it


580 posted on 03/23/2012 9:04:54 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 761-762 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson