Posted on 03/15/2012 7:52:12 AM PDT by Skeez
Campaigning in Puerto Rico today, Rick Santorum said that Puerto Ricans needed to adopt English as their official language if they wanted to make a serious push for U.S. statehood. Santorum is in Puerto Rico making his pitch for the GOP's primary on Sunday.
"Like any other state, there has to be compliance with this and any other federal law," Santorum said. "And that is that English has to be the principal language. There are other states with more than one language such as Hawaii but to be a state of the United States, English has to be the principal language."Reuters goes on to report that neither the U.S. Constitution nor any federal law requires that a state speak English. Some states have established English as an official language anyway. To be charitable to Santorum, he did say that English should be the "principal" language, not something to be legally required. Puerto Ricans typically learn English in high school, but census data shows only about 30% of Puerto Ricans rate their ability to speak English "very well."
Santorum's presence in Puerto Rico may seem odd - governor Luis Fortuno has endorsed his rival Mitt Romney, and the candidate perceived as a moderate has won massive portions of the electorate in the past few years - John McCain, Bob Dole and George H.W. Bush all won massive majorities there.
The people of Puerto Rico go to the polls on Sunday to vote in their GOP primary. Puerto Rico awards a small number of delegates - twenty-three - but more than some small states like Delaware.
Skeeter is right in what he says here. (I disagree with his last paragraph beyond what I excerpt above, however — reference my last post about the admission of New Mexico to the Union. Another poster has cited precedents in Louisiana and California, as well as Pennsylvania.)
From what I've seen in the media and what I know from people who saw Santorum in Iowa, one of the things which makes Santorum unusual among presidential-level candidates is that he doesn't just give stump speeches or rephrase people's questions to give the answer he wants rather than answering the question he was asked.
That has good and bad points. He engages questioners by giving them real answers to what they wanted to know, and while that is a huge part of his one-on-one appeal, sometimes that means he gets drawn into stuff that creates problems when broader audiences hear the answer to a question asked by a single individual.
This is what politicians call getting drawn off-message.
Reporters hate it when a candidate answers the question the candidate wanted to be asked instead of the question we asked, and so do voters, but usually voters don't get to complain in public when their once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to ask a question to a potential future president doesn't get answered.
I'll give Santorum lots of credit for believing that if he wants people to vote for him, he's in a job interview and needs to answer the questions that the hiring boss — i.e., the voters — want to ask.
My read of this is that Santorum, as a job candidate, just gave a really bad answer in the job interview. I've hired people before who gave bad answers to some questions if I liked most of what I heard.
While Santorum’s answer sounds like the same thing Newt Gingrich would have said to an “official English” question and may actually help him with traditional Republican primary voters, this could create serious damage for Santorum long-term with Hispanic voters that did not need to happen. As a conservative Roman Catholic, Santorum has real opportunities with religiously conservative Hispanic voters who don't usually consider Republican candidates, and I sincerely hope this doesn't come back to bite him.
Whether one likes his positions or not, this is the kind of politically incorrect statement that tends to convince people that the man is genuine.
Newt knocked Newst out of the nomination YEARS ago. I liked Santorum, I still agree with him, I still like the guy, I just wish he was more seasoned. Its dumb things like this that give social conservatives a bad name.
He's "good enough" for me, but can't I wish for more?
The answer was ""Like any other state, there has to be compliance with this and any other federal law," Santorum said. "And that is that English has to be the principal language. There are other states with more than one language such as Hawaii but to be a state of the United States, English has to be the principal language."
Aside from the reference to the law, which doesnt exist here, the answer is common sense. And I'm not willing to grant that Santorum made a mistake there, either, as a) he has since mentioned that he believed congress would make english as the primary language a prime requirement for statehood; and b) the interview was apparently conducted in spanish through an interpreter. His seemingly awkward answer implies to me that he was responding to something else asked that wasn't related in any accounts I've seen so far.
Ordinarily I'd have moved on but crap like this non-story is affecting our choices and has been for some time. Its got to stop.
In a few minutes, Mitt Romney will be on Kike Cruz’s show. At 5:30, Newt’s daughter will be on.
Wow... Looks like Puerto Rico is becoming important in national politics. FOX News just reported that this November, Puerto Ricans are voting on whether they want statehood. If that's correct I can see why Santorum got asked that question.
Keep up the good work being a FReeper on what some obviously want to be the 51st state. What you do may well become far more significant if that vote passes.
Yes, you can wish for more. I am in the same boat. I so wanted Sarah to run, and was extremely disappointed that she didn’t. She wouldn’t have played footsies with anyone, but, would have taken it to zero nonstop.
So, this election cycle is what it is.
Thank you for your interest.
Awesomeness!
Can’t wait for Mitt and Ann to visit the island this weekend...
Well then, I guess that Madison must have been taking the day off when Louisiana (majority French and Spanish speaking) was admitted as a state in 1812.
Fortunately, English is understood throughout La. today, and we have avoided Balkanization there to a large extent. With PR, we will not be as fortunate. It’s about 13 or 14 electoral votes for Democrats if they become a state. As I said, GREAT idea, Newt!
Uhh... I’m not a Newt supporter. Nor a Romney supporter. At this point i’m just flabbergasted that with all the talent we have, THIS is the best we could do.
You have a deep-seated hatred for religious people. That is the only possible reason you’ve been on-line around the clock spewing bile first at Palin, now at Santorum. You have issues. Some people love and honor God with their lives, and it’s a sad sign of the times that so many can grow up in America today and feel such contempt toward those folks who wrote the Constitution, built the country and are the first in line to aid the distressed. Bob
Thank you, CLL. I was not aware of the statehood proposal coming up, and that’s my fault.
I am so grateful to Free Republic for providing a summary of major news items like this!
I will take their Republican governor in a heartbeat. He is probably one of the most free market oriented politicians in our polity.
In a small town I grew up in, many people who came from Puerto Rico are on welfare, and even the McDonald’s menu is in Spanish.
If they learned English, they just might be able to get a job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.