Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea partiers will vote for ‘whoever’ GOP nominee ‘turns out to be’, says tea party scholar
Yahoo! News/The Daily Caller ^ | March 12, 2012

Posted on 03/12/2012 8:50:43 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last
To: happyhomemaker

YES!! you got it!


121 posted on 03/13/2012 6:47:22 AM PDT by southphilly (All States should be right to work States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
I am a broken-glass conservative,,,I will crawl over broken-glass to vote against Obama...with my dying breath...
122 posted on 03/13/2012 6:52:52 AM PDT by southphilly (All States should be right to work States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

If a “republican” candidate is nearly as far left as Obama, I’m not sure it’s to our benefit to have an (R) after the name as listed in the history books. I will not under any circumstances vote for Romney. It has nothing to do with anti-Mormon bigotry (there are quite a few LDS politicians I would prefer over anyone in the race). It has to do with Romney’s extreme pro-abortion, anti-gun, and big government policies. As terrible as Obama II would be, and it would be a nightmare because he hates everything good about America, Romney, Part I, followed by a liberal Dem could easily be even worse. In November, I’ll vote for someone worth having, even if I have to write in Newt/Sarah/Perry/Cain/Bachmann/DeMint/Santorum.


123 posted on 03/13/2012 9:39:22 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri

The Tea Party does not exist to serve as a cheering section for Advocatus’s favorite candidate. Sorry.


124 posted on 03/13/2012 10:22:04 AM PDT by denydenydeny (The more a system is all about equality in theory the more it's an aristocracy in practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
LOL. These people may be in for a rude awakening. Speaking for no one but myself, I will vote for any GOP candidate who is not named Mitt Romney.

Liberal Mitt will NEVER get a vote from me.
125 posted on 03/13/2012 10:27:29 AM PDT by Antoninus (Goal #1: Defeat Romney. Goal #2: Defeat Obama. If we don't achieve both goals, 2012 is a loss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Sure are a bunch of closet Romney supporters on this thread.

When the only positive thing you can say about your RINO is that he isn’t quite as bad as Obama you have already lost me.

Especially when it takes an electron microscope to find any differences between the two.


126 posted on 03/13/2012 10:38:46 AM PDT by Eaker (Remember, the enemy tends to wise up at the least convenient moments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

this ex-mormon won’t live in a country under a mormon president


127 posted on 03/13/2012 10:39:55 AM PDT by AnTiw1 ("Where Liberty is, there is my country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: mykroar

Mittens is currently down to 3rd on my list after Newt & Rick. However I will concede Mitt is well practiced in making the hard decisions of cutting spending. He could’nt have survived in the private sector for 25 years unless he tried to create surpluses in every outfit. He has fired hundreds of people when necessary. I think he is likely to be the most virulent spending cutter. The part of Mitt which concerns me is his attitude towards global warming and illegals and rights of GLBT.


128 posted on 03/13/2012 10:52:30 AM PDT by entropy12 (Republicans do not hate, that is a monopoly of democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Kharis13

If conservatives vote for Mitt Romney, they lose the election, their self-respect, and any hope of effecting policy change in D.C.


129 posted on 03/13/2012 2:15:46 PM PDT by Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I won’t vote for Willard.

Why exchange apostate Willard for aposotate Obama?


130 posted on 03/13/2012 2:23:06 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

1) I never claimed the Tea Party exists to cheer my candidate, 2) I don’t recall ever mentioning my “favorite candidate,” and you might as well declare the Tea Party dead if it is supposed suspend it’s very message and boost a liberal RINO like Mitt Romney. I’m not drinking the kool aid.


131 posted on 03/13/2012 2:26:24 PM PDT by Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Now how many of them were nominated by conservatives? And how many nominated by "moderates"?

Who nominated O'Connor and who nominated Thomas?

132 posted on 03/20/2012 10:37:45 PM PDT by Once-Ler (There are two paths! One is America, the other is Occupy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson