Posted on 03/08/2012 4:46:57 PM PST by Nachum
Via Lachlan Markay at Heritage, we learn a Derrick A. Bell visited the Obama White House twice in 2010. The White House did not return a request for comment. The visits were on 1/29/2010, a Friday and 1/31/2010, a Sunday. For now, a web search of news reports did not turn up why Bell may have been in Washington that particular weekend.
Heritage could not independently confirm that the Derrick A. Bell listed is the same individual who spoke at the rally. The White House did not return a request for comment.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
So.. Let's play. Winner gets an all expense paid trip to the FEMA camp of their choice...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Let’s see: What happened in the first quarter of 2010 ~ oh YES, OBAMACARE was SHOVED DOWN THE THROATS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY THE LIBERALS!!! Is it coiincidence that Bell was at the White House 2 times in the weeks before this MONSTROUS CRIME was perpetrated Against our nation? NO! and NO!
Let’s see: What happened in the first quarter of 2010 ~ oh YES, OBAMACARE was SHOVED DOWN THE THROATS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY THE LIBERALS!!! Is it coiincidence that Bell was at the White House 2 times in the weeks before this MONSTROUS CRIME was perpetrated Against our nation? NO! and NO!
Um, it was an alias for Barak Obama after a night
out with the boys?
Bttt
Barry: “Why would I deny that a tenured Harvard professor of law was a guest at the White House?”
Let’s have Soledad O’Brien explain the significance.
She was reading his book and tweeted about it in Oct of 2011.
Might want to take a screen shot since she might delete it... there have been numerous Wikipedia edits since the CNN interview.
I got it.
This guy was hardly a legal genius. His philosophy could be crammed into a single, short paragraph ~ as I did on FR the other night when he became an issue.
He seems to have dabbled in the use of speculative fiction to discuss aggregate sociological issues.
When it came to the white folks at Harvard I don't think he despised them any more than we do They were, after all, the enemy of all that's good and holy, and still are. Kagan is one of their kind .
At the same time his bio credits him with laying out a winning strategy for numerous school desegregation cases. In some quarters that makes him a very disruptive radical. in other quarters it's just one of the things that happened in history and his part in it was neither disruptive nor radical.
At the moment he is dead and will be dead for a very long time. It's not possible to go talk to him about his visits which were more than likely little more than a courtesy extended to him by Obama.
Hey, Clinton did that for a lot of people he barely knew ~ and more! I'm actually surprised that Obama had the old guy over (just before he died ~ and we might well ask if something happened there to bring that to pass).
George HW Bush visited 0bama on Jan 30, 2010.
Bell visited 0bama Jan 29 and Jan 31, 2010.
Interesting.
Thanks for this Ping. The silence on the part of the WH is telling...
Obama’s in luck. I’m sure the New York Times won’t press him on this - maybe they’ll do a puff piece on all the good Bell did - you know playing defense for their favorites.
When Bell visited the White House, did he jump up and down on any of the beds like some of Clinton’s friends did?
Obama was asleep during Bell’s visits, just like he slept through Rev. Jeremy Wright’s sermons
same answers they gave about Ayers & Wright...same name different person
These people call themselves Progressive when they spend all their time trying to tear asunder the American social fabric with their preoccupation and detonization of racial resent that really doesn’t exist?
That’s ‘progressive’? That’s hate and dissent-mongering, REGRESSIVE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.