Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this why Sandra Fluke went public?
WND ^ | March 6, 2012 | Aaron Klein

Posted on 03/07/2012 6:27:20 AM PST by Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Is this why Sandra Fluke went public?

Look which groups behind Obama's contraception strategy

Published: 11 hours ago

by Aaron Klein Email

Aaron Klein is WND's senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on New York's WABC Radio. His latest book is the N.Y. Times best-selling, "The Manchurian President: Barack Obama's Ties to Communists, Socialists and Other Anti-American Extremists

Prior to her statements to congressional Democrats, did Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke have any prior connection to Obama administration officials?

Did the congresswomen who pushed Fluke’s testimony coordinate with a marketing and polling outfit that recently conducted a survey to determine whether contraception mandates can become a possible presidential election issue?

According to some reports, it was Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., who pushed for Fluke’s testimony. Maloney also initiated the call for Fluke to sue Rush Limbaugh for his on-air derogatory remark about Fluke, according to the Daily Beast.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; blindinglyobvious; contraceptives; extremists; radicalleft; sandrafluke; sandytheslut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: muawiyah
Why don't we know more about Sandra Fluck, the way we had to learn every little thing about Joe the Plumber?

For instance, I've been reading that she might own a house in Georgetown that's assessed for $450K. Is this true? Where did she get that kind of money--brokering condoms?

And the first time I saw her photo, I thought--That's a man!! But her voice is maddeningly screechy, so I don't think so.

Could she be transgendered?

Who's her Dad? What's her family?

21 posted on 03/07/2012 6:54:59 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Fluke is so much the personification of liberalism—

Unattractive, unfeminine, pro-abortion, absolutely no sense of responsibility, in favor other paying for herself, and biggest of all, she so fully embraces her VICTIMHOOD.


22 posted on 03/07/2012 6:59:13 AM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

No. Fluke was a willing participant and as one tied to liberal positions is eager to help the cause. This definately was no accidental person who just stumbled in off the street.

Like another poster said, the dem/libs are well known for over-playing. This will probably be no exception.


23 posted on 03/07/2012 7:18:40 AM PST by X-spurt (Its time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I'd be surprised if there aren't more ties to the Hillary Clinton crowd than to the Zippo crowd.

Everything about her screams Hillary follower.

24 posted on 03/07/2012 7:21:32 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

She is a rabid liberal feminist with a chip on her shoulder (deep seated hatred of men in general).

NO ONE participates in the vagina monologues that isn’t as described by at least one of the above (most likely all of the above).

Look at her credentials and notice the causes she champions and the associations she has - that makes it perfectly clear even to the laziest of observers...


25 posted on 03/07/2012 7:30:09 AM PST by jurroppi1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

A couple of weeks ago George Stephanopolous asked Rick Santorum in a debate his standing on contraception. This was weird and “out of the clear blue sky”. A week or so later on Meet the Press David Gregory did the same thing. Then up pops Ms. Fluke with her “testimony” to a panel of Democrats only about the evil Georgetown not paying for her contraceptives and abortifacients Only a fool would consider this scenario a coincidence. It was organized by the DNC, the White House or both.


26 posted on 03/07/2012 7:51:54 AM PST by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TennesseeGirl
Carefully setting up a test case is not uncommon. Rosa Parks is a good example. Homer Plessy is another; Plessy vs. Ferguson was stage managed all the way, although those that picked the fight did not get the decision they wanted. (Plessy was 7/8 white, a polished and successful businessman, and the railroads wanted to be rid of idiotic southern racial rules that complicated business.) The Scopes Monkey Trial is another great example.

I've always wondered about the Dred Scott case. Irene Emerson, his owner, may have been a hard case ... but by 1850 she had moved to Massachusetts and had remarried ... to an abolitionist(!!!) She also seems to have permitted Dred Scott and his family to travel freely and move and mix in some pretty high powered abolitionist circles. Scott's case was partially financed by the son of his first owner, the son having by now become anti-slavery. Irene transferred Scott's ownership to him after the Supreme Court ruling; Scott was then freed. Smells like a setup job to me but I've never researched it closely and have not seen the suspicion confirmed.

27 posted on 03/07/2012 7:52:14 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

I’m with you on that, but, more than likely the Dem’s will find some other Useful Idiot for the next ‘issue’ they want to bring up, when its time to deflect criticism from the them or the moron in chief. Basically, she’s the flavor of the day for now. But I doubt she will be tomorrow.

Unfortunately, the only reason this is still an issue is because of the stuff w/ Rush. Which I fully support, by the way.


28 posted on 03/07/2012 7:57:01 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

[ This is how Libs win. They control a vast empire of propogandists with national and international reach, funded largely by taxpayer money. Conservatives operate as individuals, or at best, small groups crying into rain barrels, funded locally with private money. Of course the Libs win every national issue. We still haven’t learned. ]

When you control all of the messengers it is trivial to control the message....

We need to make/build more messengers on our side, and the internet has helped and this is why they are going to be clamping down on the internet. Be wary of ANYTHING that seeks to restrict the internet.


29 posted on 03/07/2012 8:41:46 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jurroppi1

what is this V monologues? I’ve heard it’s name pop up many times before.


30 posted on 03/07/2012 9:05:03 AM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Inwoodian

Somebody should ask David and George their prophylactic policy ~ do they practice safe sex?


31 posted on 03/07/2012 11:05:52 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
If he even wanted to, could Rush sue HER for jeopardizing his means of income. I know he has means, personally, but it would be nice to see discovery, etc. in a suit against her.
32 posted on 03/07/2012 11:54:01 AM PST by hummingbird (SPARTACUS --->BREITBART --->FREEPERS TO CARRY ON FORWARD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TennesseeGirl

Thanks for your post. I did not know the history & background behind the Rosa Parks bus ride.

Tammy Bruce cuts to the chase. I like the way she presents the left.


33 posted on 03/07/2012 12:00:54 PM PST by hummingbird (SPARTACUS --->BREITBART --->FREEPERS TO CARRY ON FORWARD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Did the congresswomen who pushed Fluke’s testimony coordinate with a marketing and polling outfit that recently conducted a survey to determine whether contraception mandates can become a possible presidential election issue?

According to some reports, it was Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., who pushed for Fluke’s testimony. Maloney also initiated the call for Fluke to sue Rush Limbaugh for his on-air derogatory remark about Fluke, according to the Daily Beast.

All this AFTER her original testimony at the hearing on Obamacare was rejected because the 'Rats in charge of the congressional hearing found she lacked expertise on the subject of the hearing: Obamacare.

34 posted on 03/07/2012 12:16:34 PM PST by Publius6961 (“It’s easy to make phony promises you can’t keep.” - Obama, Feb23, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster
I don't think so. I think she's now a liberal heroine. If she's not picked up in a high-profile position on the staff of a high-profile lib politician, then she'll be in a liberal think-tank.

You mind telling us how that worked out for Monica?

35 posted on 03/07/2012 12:23:12 PM PST by Publius6961 (“It’s easy to make phony promises you can’t keep.” - Obama, Feb23, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

Quite sure the dem/libs will try this War on Women until they finally figure out no one is listening, then will try to gen up another thing. Because of the real dire straits nobama is on on re-election, their tactics will become both hilarious and alarming.

If we ever get pure control (House, Senate and POTUS) there are two very primal things we must do. One is make it a crime to intentionally lie in political campaigning, , punishable if proven just like in court, punishable with hard time plus loss of voting for 4 years and two to make it a “hard time” crime plus loss of vote for 4 years to commit or enlist voter fraud.

When those tow things are cleared up, a heck of a lot of other anti-Constitution things will clear up.


36 posted on 03/07/2012 1:51:32 PM PST by X-spurt (Its time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

Quite sure the dem/libs will try this War on Women until they finally figure out no one is listening, then will try to gen up another thing. Because of the real dire straits nobama is on on re-election, their tactics will become both hilarious and alarming.

If we ever get pure control (House, Senate and POTUS) there are two very primal things we must do. One is make it a crime to intentionally lie in political campaigning, , punishable if proven just like in court, punishable with hard time plus loss of voting for 4 years and two to make it a “hard time” crime plus loss of vote for 4 years to commit or enlist voter fraud.

When those tow things are cleared up, a heck of a lot of other anti-Constitution things will clear up.


37 posted on 03/07/2012 1:51:37 PM PST by X-spurt (Its time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
You mind telling us how that worked out for Monica?

Monica was never an advocate for leftist causes (even Pelosi didn't push for funding for more oral sex). She was a bit of an embarrassment to the left. She was never held out as an example of a woman assaulted by the right, she's not an a law school graduate, she never could have testified before Congress.

You didn't see Monica being invited on talk shows; Fluke was immediately invited.

Does that make sense?

38 posted on 03/07/2012 5:21:17 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Sandra Kay Fluke is 30 years old, and graduated from Cornell University.

Her father is Richard B Fluke, II, who is a machinist and a pastor at a Methodist church from a small town in Pennsylvania, Saxton.

Her mother, Betty Kay Fluke, is a school counselor.

Sandra graduated from Tussey Mountain High School in Saxton and was salutatorian in 1999.

Sandra has been living "part-time" in -- shudder -- West Hollywood, California.

39 posted on 03/07/2012 5:32:53 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Congressional Democrats and progressive interest groups are more than capable of finding someone like this and putting her forward without the White House being involved.

I wouldn't be surprised if the general theme "Republican War on Women" came from the White House and the Obama campaign.

But the original choice to testify at the hearing was a man. Somebody there, among the congressional Democrats and staffers, saw that it would have to be a woman, and picked Fluck.

Anything is possible, but I suspect she was too low down on the food chain for Obama or his people to have noticed her on their own.

FWIW, there's a little bit of a backlash or backwash or blowback on the left. Nothing really important, but some bloggers and commenters complain about Obama's "your parents should be proud of you" as patronizing and infantilizing a 30-year old woman.

40 posted on 03/07/2012 5:40:59 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson