THAT INFORMATION HAS BEEN UP SINCE JULY 2011.
Posted on 03/04/2012 11:50:20 AM PST by ethical
To prove that the birth document Obama posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulent document, all you need to determine is whether or not it is a computer created document or a scanned photocopy.
It is a computer created document. Even the obots can not deny that.
You do not need to ask the Hawaii DOH for a "waiver" in order to get a computer created birth document. Obama asked for special permission from Hawaii DOH to get photocopies of his original birth certificate. Loretta Fuddy granted that request and gave Obama, she says, photocopies of his original birth certificate.
Scanning a photocopy, in order to post it on a website, does not turn it in to a computer created document with multiple layers and movable text. Although interesting, it isn't all the details of the forgery that first reveal that it's a fake; different fonts, the halos, the weird bent page, the strange behavior of the security paper. It is the fact that it IS a computer created document and NOT a scanned photocopy.
But let's look at one of those fun forgery details. I included the web addresses for the quote and images I describe.
Here is what Chiyome Fukino [Former Director of Hawaii Public Health Department] had to say about how the “birthers” would respond to the release of Obama’s birth certificate.
“They’re going to question the ink on which it was written or say it was fabricated.” Said Fukino. “The whole thing is silly.”1
Let’s start with the ink, shall we?
From Hawaii Public Health Regulations Title: Vital Statistics, Registration & Records. Chapter 8, Certificates of Vital Statistics Events, Section 1. Preparation. Certificates of vital statistics events are to be filled in by typewriter or in ink. If ink is used only permanent ink will be acceptable. All signatures are to be made with permanent ink. In all other respects, the certificates shall comply with provisions of Section 57-14, R.L.H. 1955.”
On April 27, 2011 Barack Obama revealed what he said was a photo copy of his original long form ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ from Hawaii (it was posted on the White House website). The signatures on this ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ are required to be made in permanent ink.
Pixels Don’t Lie
Download the BC document off the White House website and open it in Adobe Illustrator. Now zoom in on the signature of Obama’s mother. The pixels reveal that only a portion of the signature is in ink as required by Hawaii Public Health Regulations Chapter 8.
The Ann and the D in Dunham are in ink. The pixels are a variety of gradations in greys and blacks, like ink signature pixels are. But what’s really interesting is that the rest of the signature, ‘unham and Obama’, are not in ink.
The letters are a solid greenish–black color with no gradation in color at all. This lack of gradation reveals that this part of the signature was created in the computer and is not even penmanship.
And what’s it called when you forge a signature on a “Certificate of Live Birth” from Hawaii? FORGERY! Well that would be my top pick but hey they also violated Hawaii Public Health Regulations by not using permanent ink in their forgery! Maybe that’ll tick someone off.
If you ignore the fact that this document was computer created and that fact, in and of itself, makes it a forgery, you can't deny what the pixels are telling us.
The Stanley Ann Dunham Obama signature on this document is a forged signature and that makes the whole document a forgery.
Figure 1. The Dunham part of the signature of Obama’s mother on the alleged long form original ‘Certificate of Live Birth’, posted on the White House website. Here it has been downloaded into Adobe Illustrator.
Figure 2. Zooming in on the top part of the ‘D’ in Dunham. You can see the variation in color pixels—variations of grays to black tones. This is how pixels of a signature will appear when it is applied with ink and scanned.
Figure 3. Focusing now on the start of the ‘u’ next to the D in Dunham. You can see there is no gradation of color at all. A solid dark greenish-black color displays no evidence of the gradation in color for these pixels which implies that this “signature” was created with image editing software and not with ink.
Figure 4. The last image focuses on the O in ‘Obama’ and part of the b. You can see there is no color change in the pixels. The solid pixel color again suggests the signature was not scanned or representative of ink. The ‘Obama’ portion of the signature was computer generated.
1. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42519951/ns/politics-more_politics/t/ex-hawaii-official-denounces-ludicrous-birther-claims/ 2. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
3. Albert Renshaw Obama BC Fake http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY
That’s nonsense. The unlayered version was flattened and issued after they had realized their stupid blunder in not flattening the first version before releasing it. A layered document, due to pasting add-ons to an original document, can easily be flattened, but the layering only occurs if the document has been edited — and editing screams ‘FORGERY’.
No trap as far as computer created documents versus a scanned photocopy. Hawaii did not start to computer generate birth records until 2001. Until then they were done on forms with type, date stamps and permanent ink for signatures. Photo copied when people wanted a certified copy. And he was born in 1961, we are told, not the mid 80’s.
Another ride on the Birther roller coaster!
Back up the hill we go...
Nothing explains the disturbing images on Obamas posted document. Nothing except that the document was electronically created. That explains everything. He posted a computer created document and NOT the scanned photocopy he says he posted. You know a scanned photocopy does not turn in to a computer generated created document simply by the scanning process?
My apologies if this is a double ping, but I’m not sure if I pinged your name correctly in my previous post.
Please see #24. Thanks!
“An EXTRAORDINARY crack researcher/commenter at WTPOTUS who has solved the riddle and discovered the identity of the registrar who allegedly signed Barack Hussein Obama II’s “long-form birth certificate.””
“The reveal:”
“An entry in the 1961/62 Polk directory reads:”
“LEE Verna K L Mrs. clk State Dept of Health r1228 a 16th av”
“There you have it, boys and girls. Mrs. Verna K. L. Lee, and NOT Mr. Ukulele!”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2751301/posts
Which is different from the local registrar, the hospital official charged with certifying the birth certificate information, is different than the name on the Nordyke twins certificates, who were born in the same hospital, less than 24 hours after when Obama's BC says he was born.
The “trailer park analysis” theory that you hold to can easily be extinguished with a simple piece of paper. Arpaio’s team of lawyers, investigators, and computer specialists, worked this problem for 6 months trying to make the problem go away. Of course it will never go away because guess what genius? The BC is a fake and if you took five minutes of your day looking at facts, instead of parroting an establishment website’s planted story, you would know that.
Scanned document in to PDF, one layer. You are referring to a scanned document that was then “optimized”. After optimization you will get a few layers but not like what you see on Obama’s document. But you can’t use this point to legitimize the birth record because it proves computer generation. Any point you use that proves it is a computer created document proves it is not a scanned photocopy and therefore is not a copy of his original BC. Focus on that.
ping.
Obama Birth Certificate Faked In Adobe Illustrator - Official Proof 1 ( Layers )
The BC is an outright fraud.
If there was a forger, don't you think they might have access to a Polk Directory too, and picked a name out. OTOH, if she routinely signed as local registrar, there should be other BCs from the period with her signature.
Did they check that Polk Directory for the woman who signed the Nordyk twins certificates as the Local Registrar? If she worked for the hospital, we have problem, if she worked for the State Department of Health, that would indicate that the local registrar was a state, rather than hospital, official.
I will say that the signature does not look like one by a woman of that era, who would have been taught penmanship, when she was in school. My mother went to the archetypical "one room schoolhouse" in a Nebraska corn field (or wheat or sorghum). She was 33 years old in August of '61. Her penmanship was much, much better than that, and she practiced the exercises she'd been taught to keep it that way. The signature on the Nordyke twins' certificate looks more like what I would expect from someone of that era, although not as good as my Mom's was then, and the copies I've seen of those certificates are pretty poor, still you can make out that her first name was probably Beatrice, her middle intial "L" and her last name as "Yqusin" or "Ygusin" or "Yqusia" or "Ygusia".
Right.That video deals with OCR and optimizing too. Neither of those create the fraud we see in Obama’s bC. But again. It is not a scanned photocopy. Period. It is not what he said it was, he asked for a waiver to get a photocopy NOT a computer generated document. So now Obama has yet another forged document to splain away. At this point law enforcement needs to just finish the investigation and throw some people in jail.
Good luck getting anywhere with that.
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/1961-hawaii-department-of-health-registrar-identified/
I think everything you asked for is explained on the above website.
WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES BLOG. (WTPOTUS)
A group of researchers who are dedicated and don’t just sit around and argue the point with each other, or try to show each other how clever they are, or say MEMEMEMEIIII all the time.
THAT INFORMATION HAS BEEN UP SINCE JULY 2011.
What forger would put together a document using this bizarre cut and paste, layering method...and then forget to merge the layers or flatten the image?
The answer...NONE!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.