1 posted on
03/03/2012 9:55:13 AM PST by
kristinn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: kristinn
So, it looks like this “reporter” has it all figured out. Obammy is the good guy and Rush is the bad guy for telling it like it is.
The woman in question certainly appears to be a slut based on her on words. and no, the public should not be paying for her lifestyle.
3 posted on
03/03/2012 10:00:27 AM PST by
basil
(It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
To: kristinn
4 posted on
03/03/2012 10:01:09 AM PST by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemies of freedom. Be Andrew Breitbart.)
To: kristinn
Newt is half right.
Obama is a political opportunist, but what he misses is that Rush was being jocular. He was funning with the libtards because he knew it would spin them up.
5 posted on
03/03/2012 10:01:42 AM PST by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: kristinn
Good on Newt!! :D
Speaker Gingrich understands Alinsky tactics.
The left developed them in part, against Gingrich himself, with the help of spineless ‘Republicans’ who ran away the moment the left started their smears.
Gingrich knows.
To: kristinn
Gingrich handles himself better than anyone else. Over the past couple of months I've expressed a general preference for either Santorum or Gingrich. No more.
I've seen Santorum apologize too much in recent weeks. I hate that. I really, really hate that. No apologies. Ever.
On Super Tuesday, I will be voting for Gingrich.
7 posted on
03/03/2012 10:03:21 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
("And the public gets what the public wants" -- The Jam)
To: kristinn
First of all, the issue isn’t about the Catholic Church trying to ban contraception, because it’s not. The issue is that the federal government is trying to force the Catholic Church to pay for contraception.
Second of all, Ms. Fluke is not a “co-ed.” She is a 30-year old political operative with an undergraduate degree in New-Agey women and sex studies.
Third of all, why is the Catholic Church supposed to pay for the contraception of a woman wealthy enough to pay $65,000 tuition a year, but so poor she can’t afford $9 a month to pay for her own damned pills?
8 posted on
03/03/2012 10:05:05 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the sociopaths.)
To: kristinn
I’m confused. Did she really testify to Congress or just do a photo op with Pelosi?
9 posted on
03/03/2012 10:05:15 AM PST by
Mercat
To: kristinn
Opportunistic would not be the word I would use.
More like pandering as in “The Panderer in Chief”.
To: kristinn
Gingrich said the problem is infringement on religious liberty, not contraception. Bingo! so lets re frame the debate and drop this contraception BS.
You can get a jimmy coat in any town.
11 posted on
03/03/2012 10:05:58 AM PST by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: kristinn
What does he think now that she has been outed as a complete fraud? She’s a 30 year old lib lawyer not a 23 y.o. student.
12 posted on
03/03/2012 10:07:19 AM PST by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(How ironic that Ann Coulter should write a book called Treason.)
To: kristinn
“Newt Gingrich avoided criticizing Rush Limbaugh for publicly assailing Sandra Fluke”
Gingrich understands the left. He refuses to play their games. I don’t always like everything he says but no one else running for president even comes close to advancing the conservative agenda as much as Gingrich.
I am hoping for a Super Tuesday super miracle. Go Newt!
To: kristinn
17 posted on
03/03/2012 10:10:26 AM PST by
coon2000
(Give me Liberty or give me death!)
To: kristinn
Newt handled this perfectly. What the media people were looking for was an opportunity to run headlines like “Gingrich agrees that student is a slut” or “Gingrich scolds conservative giant Limbaugh” He did not fall into the trap.
20 posted on
03/03/2012 10:12:17 AM PST by
KJC1
To: kristinn
Good for Newt.
This reporter is lying, of course. Rush did not directly call Fluke a slut. He jokingly asked what do you call a “co-ed” who jumps into bed with lots of men and expects you to buy her condoms? A slut, maybe?
I’d call her a slut. Also, a 30-year-old pro-abortion activist, who deliberately staged this whole business and lied about her age.
Hey, if she wants to go to bed with guys who have fleas, that’s her business, but don’t expect me to pick up the condom bill. Or the medical bill for getting de-flea’d.
21 posted on
03/03/2012 10:12:23 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: kristinn
.
This should be a DefCon-1 wake-up call to Rush Limbaugh ...
"Little Ricky Santorum" threw Rush under the bus yesterday ... just to appease the media ...
And on this point ... Rush Limbaugh is one-million percent CORRECT ...
What EVER would Little Ricky do (if President) and he had to a ... yikes .... COURAGEOUS STAND ....
Gulp ... even if the Nasty, Mean Liberal Media had pounded Little Ricky for ten minutes (forget 10 days in this analysis) ?
Does Little Ricky have the XXXXXX to DEFEND ANYONE (except himself, BTW) ?
And there's the GOP E-RINO "favorite silver-spoon" Mitt Romney ...
No one in the MSM Drive-By Media even bothers to ask Mitten about Rush Limbaugh's "Georgetown Slut" comment ...
WHY ?
Because whatever Mittens says NOW ... will be (attempted) to be REVERSED twenty-minutes later ...
And Romney will artfully manage to throw Rush under the bus "twice" ...
Again, as I stated on an earlier post today ...
America needs a WARRIOR-INTELLECTUAL ... such as U.S. Grant, George Patton ... and Newt Gingrich to WIN the 2012 election ...
Someone at Free Republic responded (today) that they didn't like Newt Gingrich because he acted like an "Arrogant Napoleon" ...
Well ... "Bubba Henry" ... Napoleon won a hell of a lot battles ... made some mistakes ... and so did Washington, Grant, Lee, Stonewall Jackson, Patton, Halsey, and Petraus ...
Newt Gingrich at least appears to "genuinely" learn from his mistakes ... and his attitude will lead us to victory in 2012 ...
Again ... Rush ... I'm trying to help you with your "Monday Show Prep" ...
Time for you to WISE UP and NOT GET ROLLED AGAIN by Mittens and Little Ricky Santorum ...
.
24 posted on
03/03/2012 10:15:43 AM PST by
Patton@Bastogne
(Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
To: kristinn
There you have it, the ONLY candiate in this race who actually has a BRAIN!
26 posted on
03/03/2012 10:17:31 AM PST by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: kristinn
Its about the attack on the Catholic Church and the attack on every right to life institution and whether or not the government has the power to dictate to religious organizations, he said. Bingo. Nice comeback, Newt.
30 posted on
03/03/2012 10:26:33 AM PST by
Not A Snowbird
(Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface)
To: kristinn
WAKE UP AMERICA! Newt is the only one running that has the stone’s to take on Obama and his communist pal’s. Newt understands the underlying tone of what Rush is trying to get across.
The moon-bats at NOW have opened the door for a debate next week. They and the media chomped on Rush’s bait. How are they going to defend the viral attacks on Palin? Rush will have clip after clip of their slime next week.
Oh, and when Rush brought up Maher’s contribution based on his comments of the past and present....golden!
I stand, I stand for the freedom of this generation and that of my children and grand children.
31 posted on
03/03/2012 10:26:44 AM PST by
mmanager
(NEWT - The Chruchill of our time!)
To: kristinn
An adult answers the lefts rancid attempts at breaking down the 1st amendment. Ricky could learn something here.
32 posted on
03/03/2012 10:32:36 AM PST by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)/?)
To: kristinn
Brilliant! Newt won’t allow them to frame the argument! He turns the spotlight back on the “real” offender!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson