Huh? Sheriff Joe Arpaio gives Obama 2012 a gift, goes after birth certificate

GlennBeck.com ^ | 3/2/2012 | Glenn Beck

[jdoug666]

Just when Obama was starting to run out of things to say about Republicans, Sheriff Joe Arpaio decides to come out and launch a big investigation into Barack Obama’s birth certificate

[Harlan1196]

Hard to be angry when you provide such amusement.

[Harlan1196]

You keep backing the arguments that lose over and over again.

That’s willful ignorance.

[philman_36]

Hard to be angry when you provide such amusement.
You're angry. You've told lies and have tried to besmirch my character.
Only an angry person does that. It may be indirect anger, but it's anger nonetheless.
As I said, you keep making the same mistakes.

You keep backing the arguments that lose over and over again.
You're afraid of what the end verdict will be so you keep trying to reinforce your own position to cast doubts.
You keep drawing from a dry well while you're dying of thirst.

That’s willful ignorance.
Oh, now that's funny!

Willful ignorance is the state and practice of ignoring any sensory input that appears to contradict one's inner model of reality. Your "inner model of reality" is definitely being contradicted and you ignore anything that is contrary to it.

[Harlan1196]

No. So your response to my supposedly besmirching your character is to be rude, petty and insulting? What sort of character does such behavior reveal? Looks like all you did is get down in the mud with me. And you look very comfortable doing it.

[edge919]

Police routinely give press conferences to update the public on ONGOING investigations.

You keep undermining your own argument. Either you think it was confidential or not. If it's not confidential, then there's no problem here.

Secondly, show me where Sheriff Joe gave his official permission to use the information for a book.

It's my understanding that Sheriff Arpaio wrote the foreword for the book.

[Harlan1196]

When police update ongoing investigation do the public they do not give out details and findings. Lawyers spend a lot of time making vetting what gets released so that the final investigation is not compromised.

But why are we arguing - it was not a real investigation. The fact that Sheriff Joe wrote the forward to the book proves that - interesting to know what his under the table cut is.

[philman_36]

So your response to my supposedly besmirching your character is to be rude, petty and insulting?
Supposedly?!! There is no "supposedly". Your actions and words are documented and you'll never escape them no matter how hard you try.
So, yeah, to you I am that way. I give back what I get first. You started this, not me.

What sort of character does such behavior reveal?
Now, I know you'll vehemently disagree, but I'll tell you anyway...
I don't simply roll over to 'be nice' and I won't die on my knees.

Can you "grok" that or do you need clarification?

[cynwoody]

Arpaio is not going after the birth certificate. He is going after the computer-generated forgery that obama released and called a birth certificate.

Yes, and that's pointless unless it can lead to a comparison with the paper document in Hawaii's possession.

[Harlan1196]

Can’t you at least fight back like a man instead of a whiny three year old?

[Gaffer]

With all due respect, just because 'masses' don't consider something that could very possibly be the truth doesn't mean that the possible truth of the issue is false and to be ridiculed. Far from it. It is substance particularly if it is true.

Democrats pooh-pooh the contention and ridicule it. Just like many of the made up crises that Rebublicans so seriously consider when the Democrat morass blathers on and on about it (most recently, contraception, etc.).

Lastly, as we've heard so so many times before from the Democrat machine "the seriousness of the charge deserves full investigation." When you meet your maker, do you really want to explain that you didn't confront wrong because it was uncomfortable?

[philman_36]

How would you fight back?

[Harlan1196]

Not like you. Less petty meanness over picayune issues (typos are a good example). Willingness to admit when you are wrong instead of going straight to the insults. Less calling me a liar over things you have no actual knowledge of. Things like that.

[philman_36]

You don't even realize when you step in your own pile of hot, steaming oral feces.
Why would I even need to "fight back" if there wasn't a need to do so in the first place?
You've just shot down every argument you've ever made in your own defense.
D'OH!

[Harlan1196]

We are talking about the childish and immature manner in which you fight.

If I was fighting to protect my character, I would fight with character. That’s all.

[philman_36]

We are talking about the childish and immature manner in which you fight.
No, we are talking about my need to fight in the first place and I'll fight any way I choose. If you deserve an infantile response I'll gladly give it to you and have no qualms about doing so whatsoever.

How I fight back seems to be your only concern, not the fact that I need to do so. You shouldn't concern yourself with such trivial matters and focus on the real issue.

If I was fighting to protect my character, I would fight with character. That’s all.
The more you talk the less character you seem to exhibit.

[Harlan1196]

Perhaps you are simply too sensitive for a message board? I will leave you alone for awhile - you seem upset.

[philman_36]

Perhaps you are simply too sensitive for a message board?
Perhaps you're too presumptuous for a political forum.

I will leave you alone for awhile - you seem upset.
Translation - I've just had my backside handed to me on a silver platter and I have to run away to regroup.

[philman_36]

Where are the contractions?
You are, not you’re. We are, not we’re.

[MHGinTN]

You read that obamanoid shill quite well! ‘Clean-up on aisle #156. Fabreeze alert, too!’

[philman_36]

Clean-up on aisle #156.