Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/01/2012 11:54:35 AM PST by VU4G10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: VU4G10

Obama is an ................


2 posted on 03/01/2012 11:56:15 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VU4G10
If we join Israel in an attack against Iran it must deliver a crippling blow, not a warning, nor nibbling around the edges. It will bring death and destruction to Iran, which is the nature of war. Not necessarily advocating such an action, just don't want halfway measures, a prolonged war, or a ground conflict. Declare war (as they will surely do against us), defeat them utterly, and accept their surrender. Like Japan and Germany they will not surrender unless their ability to wage war is eliminated, which they will be forced to do after a punishing and sustained attack. But they are not Japan or Germany. They need not be occupied. Let them rebuild. Again, we must not enter another no-win war.
3 posted on 03/01/2012 12:08:56 PM PST by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VU4G10

The Pentagon released the following statement regarding their war plans against Iran:

“We sincerely apologize for (insert cause here)”


7 posted on 03/01/2012 12:31:59 PM PST by GeorgiaDawg32 (God is dead - William Hamilton....William Hamilton is dead - God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VU4G10
Well that would be one way to reduce the size of America's nuclear arsenal. Iran wants nukes so much, lets give them a few hundred pointy end first.
8 posted on 03/01/2012 12:35:06 PM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VU4G10

The LAST thing we need now is another war


11 posted on 03/01/2012 1:06:22 PM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VU4G10

I believe the only reason there is talk about the U.S. joining in with Israel in a strike on Iran is for the purpose of becoming the dominant partner in such a strike in order to LIMIT and INHIBIT the overall scope of such an attack, i.e., 0bama has no desire to see Iran’s nuclear program neutered, nor to see their military-industrial complex decimated, ditto so far as their leadership-command structure is concerned.

What 0bama and his crew of clowns have calculated is that if they were to opt out of an Israeli strike on Iran, they would be unable to influence the outcome, beyond possibly giving Iran an under the table ‘heads up’ that an attack was underway. Once Israel begins such an attack, nobody is going to tell them to stop until they determine that their military objectives have been met.

With U.S. participation, 0bama is hoping to be able to call the shots which means that any attack will just be a limp dick effort which will do nothing except to provoke international outrage against ISRAEL, which is what our illegal regime of thugs in Washington wants more than anything else, the end game THEN becomes “let’s take this all to the U.N.” where we can be sure the deck is already totally stacked against Israel.

My theory, anyway.


12 posted on 03/01/2012 1:10:02 PM PST by mkjessup (Romney is to conservatism what e.coli is to an all-you-can-eat salad bar. NO ROMNEY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VU4G10

The word that says it all for the mac daddy lying administration is “COULD”.


13 posted on 03/01/2012 1:25:20 PM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VU4G10

Obama is posturing again.
Anyone who trusts him is a slow learner.

Only two ways this can go:

Obama sells Israel out before they attack.
Sets them up and leaves them hanging like JFK’s Bay of Pigs.

Obama turns on Israel after they attack.
Uses it to justify backing muslim military action against Israel.

Obama showed his true colors when he treated Netanyahu like dirt during his White House visit.


14 posted on 03/01/2012 2:04:35 PM PST by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VU4G10

Making this sort of announcement does not indicate to me that the kenyan is actually ready to do the deed. It may well be part of “diplomatic pressure” on Iran. That said I have no doubt that the Pentagon has detailed plans and has prepositioned supplies for any eventuality, even if the kenyan has told them it ain’t gonna happen, ever!, because if Iran launches against anyone then whatever the kenyan has heretofore said likely becomes nonoperational.


17 posted on 03/01/2012 2:39:10 PM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VU4G10

What worries me most is the activation of the hundreds (or even more) terrorist sleeper cells here in the US. Iran isn’t completely talking out it’s backside, there is a very real danger here at home. Then the resulting police state will be here by election time. Tinfoily? Perhaps.....


25 posted on 03/01/2012 4:28:06 PM PST by thescourged1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson