Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michigan GOP Primary: Romney 40%, Santorum 34%
Rasmussen Reports ^ | Friday, February 24, 2012 | Rasmussen

Posted on 02/24/2012 1:20:43 PM PST by Mariner

True to a primary season already marked by sudden and surprising ups and downs, Mitt Romney has jumped back into the lead in Michigan’s Republican Primary race. The vote’s on Tuesday.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Republican Primary Voters in Michigan shows Romney with 40% of the vote and former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum with 34%. The poll was conducted on Thursday night, following the last scheduled debate among the GOP candidates. (To see survey question wording, click here.)


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: michigan; mittens; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-218 next last
To: TitansAFC

Those links are not live.


101 posted on 02/24/2012 3:02:20 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

I see you are a proud Navy vet. Thank you for your service. Not surprising that you support Newt. So many of our military are supporting him. Those who pur their lives on the line, instinctively recognize a leader.


102 posted on 02/24/2012 3:04:40 PM PST by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
The handwriting was on the wall. Santorum really did recieve a free pass until just recently. Now that the vetting and facts on his record are exposed..he will go down.

I was hoping Santorum would win Michigan as it would help Newt and hurt Romney. Still believe Newt will get a boost in the polls after super tuesday and even beyond. The more that comes out on Mitt and Santorum and the more focused on Obama that Newt remains..the MORE people will rally and unite behing "The Speaker"

103 posted on 02/24/2012 3:04:56 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

I see you are a proud Navy vet. Thank you for your service. Not surprising that you support Newt. So many of our military are supporting him. Those who put their lives on the line, instinctively recognize a leader.


104 posted on 02/24/2012 3:05:14 PM PST by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I’m not convinced that he’s “already lost”. Imho, he will spend every dime he has to achieve the presidency. He’s that obsessed.


105 posted on 02/24/2012 3:05:49 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
The self identified ‘team player’ has never been a leader. More like an union ear-marker and PROUD of it.
106 posted on 02/24/2012 3:06:43 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Gee whiz! I was hoping Rickster would slow Romney in MI.

I think Rick will wake up smelling Newt’s roses, now that he is actually on the receiving end of the Romney carpet bomb.

I believe Newt will rise again, and hope Romney goes broke.
Did he inject himself again? Thought he was down to 7.8 million a few days ago. His expenditures must be the only thing left supporting the economy!

Do you have info on Romney’s cash on hand that is even more recent?

Thanks for all you do.


107 posted on 02/24/2012 3:09:33 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Newt knows where all the bodies are buried, because he buried them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Heck, that was taken from the same Rasmussen Poll in the thread. Go read it in its entirety.


108 posted on 02/24/2012 3:10:10 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet; Cindy of Nashville; trisham; DJ MacWoW; The Cajun; RedMDer

I’m voting for NEWT GINGRICH too.

I am convinced he needs to be our next POTUS and even more importantly our next Commander-in-Chief.

I am thrilled Colonel Oliver North is backing him too, for CIC.


109 posted on 02/24/2012 3:10:40 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: throwback
You have to give it to Romney. The guy has little to no appeal but he's managed to push that empty suit pretty far.

When you have the E-Pubs willing to lie cheat and steal, it does offer up some advantage. Even Faux news has been in the tank for him from the beginning.

Romney wins in Iowa, yea, except he didn't
Romney wins in Maine, yea, except he didn't

But you would not know that by watching the lap dogs on Faux news. Clearly the E-Pubs have pulled out all stops for this one.

Here on FreeRepublic we continue slinging mud at all the candidates, doing the dirty work for the opposition, when there is no reason to. I will vote for Newt or I will vote for Santorum, but I will to vote for Romney or Paul.

110 posted on 02/24/2012 3:11:22 PM PST by itsahoot (Much easier to tear down a building, than to build one. Bigger mess though.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600; onyx; DJ MacWoW; wagglebee; little jeremiah; trisham; metmom

Look. I don’t have the time right now to decipher your newbie libspeak that started in your anti-Santorum/anti-religious nonesense from post 56.

But I do find it amusing that you start quoting the Bible as you attack our Christian viewpoints.

IBTZ.


111 posted on 02/24/2012 3:12:50 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This mean Liberals and/or Libertarians (Same Thing) NO LIBS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

Newt said it would be a “serious blow” to any of the candidates to lose their home states. He didn’t say anyone should pull out.

Newt is the only true statesman in the race. That hardly makes him “superfluous”. He mentored and helped Santorum when Santorum was a young Congressman. To say that Newt has done more for this nation than the other two candidates put together would be an understatement.


112 posted on 02/24/2012 3:15:23 PM PST by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
On the one hand he claims to be a man of convictions..on the other hand he votes against his convictions to "take one for the team"

any man that is proud of tossing hard earned taxpayers money to the winds is a disgrace

113 posted on 02/24/2012 3:16:51 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“But I do find it amusing that you start quoting the Bible as you attack our Christian viewpoints.”

I didn’t attack your “Christian viewpoints,” and you cannot demonstrate how I did. It becomes even more absurd when you realize that my guy, Newt, is also Catholic and has all the same pro-life sentiments and positions. This is the blindness of the typical Santorumbot that I keep seeing over and over again, and it is quite disturbing.


114 posted on 02/24/2012 3:16:56 PM PST by Apollo5600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I’m voting for NEWT GINGRICH too.

I am convinced he needs to be our next POTUS and even more importantly our next Commander-in-Chief.

I am thrilled Colonel Oliver North is backing him too, for CIC.

*********************************

Agreed. I also love that Colonel North is backing him. That is a huge plus, imho.

115 posted on 02/24/2012 3:17:21 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600

Great post, Apollo. It is one thing when someone compliments another person on their courage, but when someone touts himself as “Courageous” as Rick did in the debate, it really puts a spotlight on the that person in a very unflattering way. One thing no one will ever accuse Rick of is modesty or humility.


116 posted on 02/24/2012 3:21:55 PM PST by conservativejoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600
I didn’t attack your “Christian viewpoints,” and you cannot demonstrate how I did.
 
Yes you did, and yes I can.
 
 
 

“Tell us. Just what do you find so offensive about our moral and religous thoughts?”

 

To be honest with you, it’s that it isn’t real. It’s like Socrates. You don’t know that you don’t know. You don’t know that all the religious and social issues are only being used to promote a perception of character and cover up a lack of substance. It’s being used to demonstrate how Holy and Principled he is, even though his platform doesn’t support it. It’s a part of his constant hypocrisy, pretending to be “above it all” while being right there stuck in it, and bashing the other candidates on a personal level, and refusing to acknowledge any good ideas.

 

 
post 85
 
 
 
In addition, when you whine about how you keep getting accused of being anti-moral... take that as a clue. You ARE anti-moral.
 


117 posted on 02/24/2012 3:23:23 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This mean Liberals and/or Libertarians (Same Thing) NO LIBS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; onyx; wagglebee; DJ MacWoW; metmom; little jeremiah; Apollo5600
Imho, it appeared that the poster is pro-Newt and anti-Santorum, but not anti-religion. That's what I concluded after a brief look at his history, at least.

I'm not pro-Santorum, either. I'm pro-Newt, and that has little to do with his religion, except that it seems that he has changed. He is aware of the wrong decisions he has made in the past, and is trying to live in accordance with God's laws.

118 posted on 02/24/2012 3:26:23 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Wrong SantoBot. Those are mostly Rass’s links to old polls and article embedded in the same web page, and not the article itself. And they do not reflect what is happening now.


119 posted on 02/24/2012 3:28:52 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

marklevinshow.com. Newt will be on Mark’s show @ 7:30.


120 posted on 02/24/2012 3:29:12 PM PST by billys kid (Everything in Massachusetts is illegal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson