Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd; onyx; wagglebee; DJ MacWoW; metmom; little jeremiah; Apollo5600
Imho, it appeared that the poster is pro-Newt and anti-Santorum, but not anti-religion. That's what I concluded after a brief look at his history, at least.

I'm not pro-Santorum, either. I'm pro-Newt, and that has little to do with his religion, except that it seems that he has changed. He is aware of the wrong decisions he has made in the past, and is trying to live in accordance with God's laws.

118 posted on 02/24/2012 3:26:23 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility2nd; trisham; Apollo5600

There’s no need to call for a ZOT, for crying out loud and I will not be a party to it!

Apollo5600 takes issue with Santorum, not RELIGION, as trisham correctly points out and as Apollo5600’s posts clearly state.

Calm down, please!


123 posted on 02/24/2012 3:36:53 PM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: trisham

This really demonstrates a larger pattern in the nature of their support. They immediately attack the integrity of Newt Gingrich in order to support their candidate whenever any discussion comes up about actual policy. “Newt sat with Pelosi” etc, even though Saint Rick sat with Barbra Boxer on actual legislation.

They don’t tackle actual issues in any great depth. But they are quite marvelous at making the debate about Newt’s character or, in this case, the character of his supporters.


125 posted on 02/24/2012 3:37:34 PM PST by Apollo5600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson