Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krauthammer On Obama's Algae Policy: "I Think He's On To Something"
Real Clear Politics ^ | 2/23/12 | staff

Posted on 02/23/2012 6:00:07 PM PST by Nachum

Charles Krauthammer responds to President Obama's suggestion that the U.S. turn to algae for energy production. After making his case, Krauthammer goes head-to-head with Washington Post columnist Charles Lane who defends Obama's energy policy.

"I was impressed by the president's analysis of this situation where we have no control over the global price of oil," Charles Krauthammer said. "We're dependent on oil from unfriendlies. And he says, as we heard, drilling for oil to relieve our dependency is not a solution, it's not a plan. He said we have to go to clean energy. He talks about something really revolutionary today. Algae. A $14 million grant for the development of algae. It's not oil. His solution is algae. And because we know that the Secretary of Energy is physicist that won the Nobel Prize, the president knowing this stuff said that one of the reasons we should do this is because we can grow algae here in the United States."

"Now, it happens that algae will grow on anywhere on earth. I looked it up while I was away for those three days. You thought I was sunning myself. I did research. It grows in oceans, in lakes and ponds, in your swimming pool when the pool man is on vacation. In snow, in ice, on soil, on turtles, on sloths, the bark of trees and rocks. Why are we drilling for oil? We are the Saudi Arabia of rocks. We have a mountain range called the Rockies and we are allowing ourselves to be dominated by these oil producers. I think he's on to something here that is truly revolutionary. Why would you build a pipeline, the Keystone pipeline with real oil from Canada to put in real refineries and put in real existing

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: algae; krauthammer; obamas; policy; sarcasm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Joe 6-pack

I suspect you’re correct.


41 posted on 02/23/2012 7:23:41 PM PST by brytlea (An ounce of chocolate is worth a pound of cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What’s it all about ... Algae?


42 posted on 02/23/2012 7:26:04 PM PST by mikrofon (Are we always going to take more than we give....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
America, you elected a doofus!

It's no use; those who elected the muslim liar, stupid, dishonest, deceitful self-centered pig are too busy kissing His posterior to ever notice they just ran out of gas.

43 posted on 02/23/2012 7:28:51 PM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: izzatzo
Headlines and first sentences do not tell the story. He does a fabulous job of calling it absolutely rediculous without ever saying it.
44 posted on 02/23/2012 7:29:45 PM PST by GizzyGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
"We're dependent on oil from unfriendlies.

So cancel that pipeline from Canada that would send enough hundreds of thousands of barrels a a day from an ally.

45 posted on 02/23/2012 7:33:30 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
"I think he's on to something"
46 posted on 02/23/2012 7:34:10 PM PST by RckyRaCoCo (I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery, IXNAY THE TSA!...P.S. Why did FR ZOT Frantzie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA; mo; Izzatso

Absolutely he was being sarcastic.

That’s why he ‘apologized’ for bringing the level of the conversation so low.

Krauthammer is D.C.-centric in a lot of ways but he was sneering at the commie-in-chief on this one.


47 posted on 02/23/2012 7:35:37 PM PST by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
"Why would you build a pipeline, the Keystone pipeline with real oil from Canada to put in real refineries and put in real existing cars when you can do algae? I think he is on to something. And I think this shows the vision, the hope and change he promised in 2008."

"Tongue out of cheek," host Bret Baier joked.

"I'm sorry that I brought the level of discussion so low," Krauthammer joked back.

Yes, it was sarcasm.
I'll be back later to see how many morons respond to the title (and maybe the first couple of paragraphs) and take Krauthammer to task.

FRegards,
LH

48 posted on 02/23/2012 7:41:23 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon

An extra $14 million grant. Big Whoop.
That’s like what it costs to bring 14 land wells on line. Except the money will go to support his ACORN retread administrators and a couple of phoney companies set up by Chicago buds.
Guy is a delusional loon.


49 posted on 02/23/2012 7:45:32 PM PST by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: izzatzo
This sort of comment is why Krauthammer has no credibility, at least with me.

Krauthammer apparently does not do well with viewers who have a very limited attention span and capacity for understanding. Of course, I could reasonably guess that you never saw the clip, but seize any opportunity to criticize a conservative who does not agree with you 100%.

50 posted on 02/23/2012 7:46:03 PM PST by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: izzatzo

Duh. It’s a joke.


51 posted on 02/23/2012 7:47:43 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
A couple of developments today re shipping Canadian oil to China.

Kinder-Morgan wants to double the capacity of its existing pipeline to Vancouver. According to reports, China is already buying tar sands oil being shipped through this pipeline.

Transport Canada approved supertankers for the Kitimat terminal of the Gateway pipeline.

52 posted on 02/23/2012 7:48:06 PM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, or the jobs that go with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Actually my son-in-law who invents stuff had an idea like that a couple of years ago.

I wish he’d get on with it so my daughter would have money.


53 posted on 02/23/2012 7:53:45 PM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: izzatzo
Bite me.

Which dictionary are you using to look up the definition of "sarcasm"?

54 posted on 02/23/2012 7:59:36 PM PST by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

WHAT are you smoking?

It was sheer SARCASM!


55 posted on 02/23/2012 8:11:13 PM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: izzatzo
This sort of comment is why Krauthammer has no credibility, at least with me.

Many on this board seem not to recognize biting satire. It was a joke, jeeze.

56 posted on 02/23/2012 8:35:59 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Romney just makes me tired all over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
""We’re making new investments in the development of gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel that’s actually made from a plant-like substance, algae -- you've got a bunch of algae out here. If we can figure out how to make energy out of that, we'll be doing alright."

He always sounds like a gaga-eyed untutored cornpone. "We need to invent stuff and things." "We'll be doin' alright." "...a bunch of algae out there."

Look, Ma! It's an algae!
Where, Elmer?!

Over there! By the pond, Ma!

Well, dadgum it, we'll be doin' alright, then!

57 posted on 02/23/2012 8:40:35 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pingman

WHOOOSH. That’s the sound of Krauthammer’s sarcasm flying right over your head. You weren’t alone by the looks of the thread.


58 posted on 02/23/2012 11:58:00 PM PST by newzjunkey (Santorum voted for Sotomayor, Obama's 1st choice for Supreme Court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

It was “tongue in cheek” and very funny


59 posted on 02/24/2012 6:18:42 AM PST by southphilly (Why in American is ever State not a right to work state?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: southphilly

There is little a narcissist can tolerate less than being scorned and laughed at. No comedian and few pundits have had the guts to do what Krauthammer did here, just shred Obama with sarcastic humor.

Sure ‘nuff, today’s big story is “The Memo” telling Obama no one’s buying either his Algae Solution or his booming economy story.


60 posted on 02/24/2012 9:31:27 AM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson