Skip to comments.
Judge says ordering of abortion was justified
Boston Globe ^
| 02/21/2012
| By Peter Schworm
Posted on 02/21/2012 9:43:50 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-177 next last
To: Responsibility2nd
Ahhh Massachusetts... the land of many laws... nuff said.
21
posted on
02/21/2012 10:04:55 AM PST
by
Mashood
To: Responsibility2nd
Forget China, US has its own government forced abortions
To: Regulator
This Judge can either read the minds of a woman who is mentally ill or she is a Nazi.
But is she any worse than a Secretary of Health and Human services that makes a ruling that all women must get health insurance that pays for abortions, sterilisations, and BC pills, paid for by me and millions of other Americans who do not believe in killing babies?
The real name for Nazi’s was Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei which means National SOCIALIST German Workers Party.
Take out German because we are not German and take out workers, because this party we have is all for those who do not work, and you have what Obama is trying to give us here in America right now.
23
posted on
02/21/2012 10:08:45 AM PST
by
Venturer
To: Responsibility2nd
This was done in the past to ‘mental defectives’, etc. who had no choice in the matter...outrageous that this woman feels she can order the killing of a children because of *her* emotions about the situation, which seem to be anti-Catholic AND anti-Constitutional! So glad the appeals court caught it!
Now when is this woman losing her job as a law-creating ‘judge’??
24
posted on
02/21/2012 10:10:30 AM PST
by
pillut48
(Israel doesn't have a friend in President Obama...and neither does the USA! (h/t pgkdan))
To: Da Coyote
Ah, tis always enlightening to watch liberals defend one of their many versions of the luminiferous aether. I would instead call it "Luciferous ethics".
To: Responsibility2nd; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; ...
26
posted on
02/21/2012 10:12:35 AM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Responsibility2nd
Interesting.
So the judge is rendering her decision based on her uncanny ability to read what is inside another's mind.
I'm glad I'm not standing before her as a defendant.
I fear I'd be sentenced to life in prison if she could read my mind...
27
posted on
02/21/2012 10:12:41 AM PST
by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: Responsibility2nd
And so it continues...first make it legal for a mother to murder her own baby....then make it not only legal but advisable.....then make it easy to obtain.....then make it a government given right......then let judges order it done.The insanity continues!!!
28
posted on
02/21/2012 10:12:53 AM PST
by
ontap
To: All
killing of a CHILD, not children, though I’d bet this isn’t the FIRST time a forced abortion has been ordered for the ‘benefit’ of the mother :-(
29
posted on
02/21/2012 10:13:00 AM PST
by
pillut48
(Israel doesn't have a friend in President Obama...and neither does the USA! (h/t pgkdan))
To: marstegreg
So the mentally ill woman went off of her meds so as not to harm the baby and the judge gleens that she doesnt want it? It seems to me that she REALLY wants it. If she cant proprly take care of the baby (after resuming medication) they can put it up for adoption. It looks like the judge she is looking for reasons to abort. Exactly - the decision was made by the woman while she was on the anti-psychotic meds, in order to protect the baby. The judge reversed the logic and lied about the state of mind of the woman at the time she made her decision, in order to kill the baby and set precident for murdering the babies of the mentally ill. And then she got (thankfully) bitch-slapped by the appellate court, but, being a murderous witch, now she's screeching.
Hillary's Army in action - the march of the soulless hags.
30
posted on
02/21/2012 10:13:00 AM PST
by
Talisker
(He who commands, must obey.)
To: Responsibility2nd
I can’t help but think that her last name is appropriate and indicative...
31
posted on
02/21/2012 10:13:55 AM PST
by
paladinan
(Rule #1: There is a God. Rule #2: It isn't you.)
To: bvw
So you think a judicially ordered abortion on an unwilling woman is OK by the Constitution?
In the USA or the PRC?
Or did you forget your /sarc/ tag?
To: Responsibility2nd
Sheesh, the Judge is in deep kimshi if Sam and Dean get wind of this demonic decision.
33
posted on
02/21/2012 10:15:03 AM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: bvw; Responsibility2nd; trisham; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; Coleus; narses; Lesforlife; ...
In the particular circumstances of the case I do agree with the Judge. So, you agree that judges can order forced abortions and forced sterilization of the mentally ill?
Do you have a list of other health conditions where you think a judge should order such barbaric procedures?
34
posted on
02/21/2012 10:17:50 AM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Responsibility2nd
I have not read her published legal decision on this case, but I would like to know what justification under Massachusetts and United States law she used for her decision. Or did she just blow past the law and rule on her whim? If she ruled based on some law, then that needs to be fixed legislatively. If she just ruled based on her whim, then I hope this decision hounds her for the rest of her life and beyond.
35
posted on
02/21/2012 10:23:50 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
To: wagglebee; bvw
After bvw came out in favor of abortion, I’ve check to see if he/she has gotten the zot.
Nope, not yet. But it is interesting his/her FReep page says....
“I’ll be in lurk mode for the indefinite future. ... Well, I try to lurk. It’s really heard to keep my yap shut.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh. So. True!!
36
posted on
02/21/2012 10:24:22 AM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This mean Liberals and/or Libertarians (Same Thing) NO LIBS.))
To: wagglebee; bvw
Do you have a list of other health conditions where you think a judge should order such barbaric procedures?
Or perhaps economic conditions? Maybe bvw can argue that if the mother is a welfare queen, then it economically makes sense to abort?
37
posted on
02/21/2012 10:28:37 AM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This mean Liberals and/or Libertarians (Same Thing) NO LIBS.))
To: Responsibility2nd
How many leftys have screamed, “Keep your hands off my uterus” when protesting to make abortion ever more available? How can a pro-abort square this act with their advocacy?
38
posted on
02/21/2012 10:29:01 AM PST
by
Sgt_Schultze
(A half-truth is a complete lie)
To: bvw
In the particular circumstances of the case I do agree with the Judge.**************************
Why?
39
posted on
02/21/2012 10:30:14 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Responsibility2nd
She also stated that Boston Universitys law school rescinded a job offer shortly after her decision came to light, an abrupt move she said could discourage judges from making unpopular decisions A result MUCH to be desired, if by "unpopular decisions" she means judges meddling in political matters.
But back to the main point. Ya gotta admire the chutzpah of people anxious to play God with other people's lives.
40
posted on
02/21/2012 10:31:49 AM PST
by
chesley
(Eat what you want, and die like a man. Never trust anyone who hasn't been punched in the face)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-177 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson