Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Oil Fields Stage “Great Revival,” But No Easing Gas Prices
National Geographic ^ | February 10, 2012 | Mason Inman

Posted on 02/10/2012 8:09:59 PM PST by lbryce

The United States has long been seen as a nation in its twilight as an oil producer, facing a relentless decline that began when President Richard Nixon was in the White House. He and every president since pledged to halt the U.S. slide into greater dependence on foreign oil, but the trend seemed irreversible—until now. Forty-one years later, U.S. oil production is on the rise.

U.S. oil fields yielded an estimated 5.68 million barrels per day in 2011—their highest output since 2003, thanks largely to a surge of new production from shale oil that lies beneath the Great Plains. The rush so far is centered in North Dakota, where oil production has quadrupled since 2005, but drilling is set to spread across the prairie and beyond.

"A 'great revival' in U.S. oil production is taking shape," said Jim Burkhard, managing director of the energy consultancy IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates in testimony last month before a U.S. Senate committee. The resurgence provides the United States a welcome measure of energy security at a time of global economic uncertainty and geopolitical risk, he said.

Yet the U.S. government's own energy analysts and many experts see a limit to this new gusher. The technological advances that have driven the revival—high-volume hydraulic fracturing combined with horizontal drilling—can only squeeze so much more crude out of the U.S. landscape, they say. Projections are that U.S. oil production will never again reach the lofty heights of the 1960s, even without environmental concerns slowing development or hampering industry with new costs.


(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalgeographic.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; oil; technology

1 posted on 02/10/2012 8:10:13 PM PST by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


2 posted on 02/10/2012 8:14:52 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
You have to ask how much more efficiently we use oil now, than in 1970. I was there for the '70s. We wasted the crap out of it.

And how many more gallons of gasoline modern refineries can get out of a barrel of oil. Lots.

So I'm not suprised we need less raw material to achieve even more results.

/johnny

3 posted on 02/10/2012 8:18:43 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

And self-sufficiency is twice the 1970 production peak.


4 posted on 02/10/2012 8:20:10 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
There's lots more oil in the ground.

But the $10-$20 a barrel oil is pretty much tapped out.

5 posted on 02/10/2012 8:35:42 PM PST by Notary Sojac (Liberalism: Ideas so good, they have to be mandatory!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Obama keeping the price of gas up so his rich oil buddies can make more money. (Where did I hear something like that before?)


6 posted on 02/10/2012 8:39:41 PM PST by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Obama keeping the price of gas up so his rich oil buddies can make more money. (Where did I hear something like that before?)


7 posted on 02/10/2012 8:39:41 PM PST by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

1.5 trillion barrels in the green river basin. 60 years supply if we develop what we have. Much of it on federal ground which would go along way towards paying off our debt


8 posted on 02/10/2012 8:49:01 PM PST by South Dakota (shut up and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand
Obama may have a couple of buddies who have stock in oil or railroads, but he is no friend to the industry.

Only the fact that the vast majority of the Williston Basin is NOT Federal Land has kept the Bakken/Three Forks boom going.

Federal Leases have been shut down throughout the Rocky Mountains by the Government, but there is no compelling reason the Government can use to shut down drilling on private land.

9 posted on 02/10/2012 8:57:39 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
NO, there is a lot more oil offshore and Anwar and....and....not to mention just east of the Rockies there is another huge shale resource (not talking about Bakken) that can be tapped.

It's policy that has kept the lid on production.

Between Canada and the US there is an immense amount of oil and gas......but where is the will.

10 posted on 02/10/2012 9:12:27 PM PST by Puckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac
But the $10-$20 a barrel oil is pretty much tapped out.

Yep. It went the way of the $5,000 new (1/2 ton) pickup, cigarettes under a buck a pack, the payphone, and the 50 cent burger...(Yes, the tech is spendy, but inflation takes a big bite, too--not to mention all the gubmint hoops.)

11 posted on 02/11/2012 12:53:35 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks lbryce.
...facing a relentless decline that began when President Richard Nixon was in the White House... Forty-one years later, U.S. oil production is on the rise. U.S. oil fields yielded an estimated 5.68 million barrels per day in 2011 -- their highest output since 2003, thanks largely to a surge of new production from shale oil that lies beneath the Great Plains. The rush so far is centered in North Dakota, where oil production has quadrupled since 2005, but drilling is set to spread across the prairie and beyond.
The amount of fuel used per day went up during that time, thanks to a rising population (nearly 50%) and despite mandated higher vehicle fuel economy. The percentage of our petroleum that is imported fell mostly due to the Obama Recession, declining employment, sales declines, fewer miles driven, and less consumed. Some small percentage of the import decrease is due to increased US production, but as noted above, the US has increased exports because of the market price. That supply has been steady, give or take the overthrow of Gaddafy and sanctions on Iran.


12 posted on 02/11/2012 5:18:50 AM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce
From the same data source, the expected demand is not predicted to climb that fast.

Short-Term Energy Outlook
U.S. Crude Oil and Liquid Fuels
http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/report/us_oil.cfm

The long range forcast shows a 1% growth average per year.

http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/er/pdf/tbla14.pdf

Things are improving, but not as well as that graph shows. Or only for selected areas and not the nation as a whole.

13 posted on 02/11/2012 6:19:25 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
And self-sufficiency is twice the 1970 production peak.

Not quite that bad. A key to remember is the breakdown of our petroleum total usage. Included in that number of ~19 MMBPD is 2.3 MMBPD of natural gas liquids. The refineries have provided a portion of that but the field production is growing with the shale natural gas production.

Petroleum Product Supplied
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_psup_dc_nus_mbblpd_m.htm

14 posted on 02/11/2012 6:28:34 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
The only reason National Geographic is worried about high gas prices is because they fear for Ubama's reelection.

Which is exactly why I "hope" for $6 per gallon gasoline come November 6th.

15 posted on 02/11/2012 9:58:10 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (FOREIGN AID: A transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You’ll get no argument on that from me.


16 posted on 02/11/2012 11:58:28 AM PST by lbryce (BHO:The bastard offspring of Satan and Medusa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You’ll get no argument on that from me.


17 posted on 02/11/2012 11:58:42 AM PST by lbryce (BHO:The bastard offspring of Satan and Medusa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand
Proven oil reserves increase with an increase in price, as more and more oil becomes profitable to produce. High prices make more oil accessible. When oil price plummeted in the 1980's oil production was harmed. High price within reason is not necessarily a bad thing in the long run.
18 posted on 02/11/2012 1:45:08 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson