Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Both of these are Catholics. When will the church use church discipline?
1 posted on 02/09/2012 4:08:17 PM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sr4402
I would agree. I can only think of only 1 catholic woman that I know who does not practice birth control.
2 posted on 02/09/2012 4:11:54 PM PST by bella1 (Santorum 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402
If the Church enforced all it's rules there would be no one there, including all the Clergy.

The Church is about seeking forgiveness, God knew from the first human, thru every Disciple, that every one of US were fallen.

3 posted on 02/09/2012 4:16:50 PM PST by reefdiver ("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402

I’m not surprised that most Catholic women are on birth control, but the Church isn’t forced to provide it for them.

Government dictating to the Church is the issue here, not whether people comply with Church doctrine.


6 posted on 02/09/2012 4:20:19 PM PST by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402

This is the true reason for Bath-House Barry’s mandate-
(notice the date this posted...)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVN2MMuiedI&feature=iv&lr=1&user=RealCatholicTV&src_vid=UC7j6LMJWzI&annotation_id=annotation_515408


8 posted on 02/09/2012 4:21:31 PM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402

In a debate such as this, there is always a goofball who argues against it. The fact that some people who claim to be Catholic use birth control is a given. But what does that have to do with the whole argument? The fact is that this Jackass in the White House is making me pay for other people to play around with something that ought to be saved for marriage. That is not right. If they want to play around, let them pay for it. Do not make me pay for it.
That is just wrong. Completely wrong, and I will fight against it.


9 posted on 02/09/2012 4:22:18 PM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402
The mendacity of these putative Catholics appears to have no end. The Church needs to purge itself of these heretics, and it needs to do so now!

If that drives people away from the Church, so be it! I'd rather be a member of a Holy Remnant, bearing Witness to the Truth of God, than to be a member of a church that gets along by compromising its ideals and failing to live up to the principles on which it was formed - and formed at such great cost in blood.



Etiam non princeps sed usque ad genua, Principis Pacis!

Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)

11 posted on 02/09/2012 4:24:43 PM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402

What difference does it make how many Catholic women use birth control?

It would not matter at all if every single one did.


12 posted on 02/09/2012 4:25:11 PM PST by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402
Vast majority of Catholic women are on birth control.

So?

So an individual CHOOSES to violate Church law.

What does that have to a Government telling a Church that they HAVE NO CHOICE and will follow Government mandates?

17 posted on 02/09/2012 4:35:22 PM PST by Mikey_1962 (Obama: The Affirmative Action President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402
That argument is like saying “Most Jewish people I know eat bacon.” So for argument's sake, let's just say that the long arm of the Obama administration is going to make bacon part of a healthy diet and everybody should pay for it as part of the health plan. Just two slices a day for better health. Should Synagogues be exempt from this?

By this logic, the answer is not only should the Synagogues pay for bacon, they should eat it, because other people do and Obama knows best.

20 posted on 02/09/2012 4:36:50 PM PST by adgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402

Here’s my favorite:
Rep. Gwendolynne Moore declared that Democrats are “not allowing the church to stand on its bully pulpit and separate women from critical, vital health care needs.”

The “democrats are not allowing the church” part should worry everyone. They just don’t get it.


22 posted on 02/09/2012 4:44:23 PM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402
I'm not sure I understand what difference it makes if the Vast majority of Catholic women are on birth control or not. That isn't the question. The issue here is can a religious organization run a charitable institution such as a hospital or school and provide their employees with health insurance that meets their religious criteria? Obama seems to think not.

The GOP candidates need to be asking that question instead of letting the MSM cloud the issue with irrelevant discussions.

In order to cut through the clutter, I suggest that we substitute the words "contraceptives" and "abortion" for "uniforms" and change the word "insurance" to "schools". Now the question is "Can a religious institution run a school and force the students to wear uniforms?" The fact that most students, even Catholic students in public schools don't wear uniforms is irrelevant to the actual question.

23 posted on 02/09/2012 4:45:08 PM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402

The top campaign contribution to Becerra in 2007-2008 was $16,900 from employees of Broadcasting Media Partners.

Becerra is a prominent member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, of which he served as chairman during the 105th Congress


24 posted on 02/09/2012 4:45:08 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402

Some of the Catholic women I know have used natural child spacing. Others who are not that committed just let things happen naturally until they have two or three kids, then they get their husband snipped.


26 posted on 02/09/2012 4:46:59 PM PST by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402

My understanding is that there has been a rule for over 10 years that if an employer provides insurance that provides for presciptions, that these companies had to provide birth control or be in violation of the 1964 Civil Rights act (re: no descrimination based on sex).

I personally don’t think this has anything to do w/ religious rights but w/ medical rights. If a company does not want to provide prescripton benefits...badda bing...the issue goes away.

This same rule regarding birth control prescriptions has been in effect in many, many states. Again...if this is a fight about state rights vs federal rights...I come down on the side of state rights.

I am just not getting how this is an attack on religion.


28 posted on 02/09/2012 4:49:24 PM PST by conservaKate (Hoping Newt's still in by WA caucus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402

Token “Catholics” flapping their jaws for Barry. Throw them out.


36 posted on 02/09/2012 5:24:54 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (So just where does the "buck stop" at the Department of "Justice"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402
“I hope that the bishops in my church will stop telling all the parishioners who believe in the Catholic faith that this is a violation of their religious freedom,” said Becerra.

Becerra and many others are using the notion that Catholic women are using artificial birth control to try to negate the Bishops' argument, but he and they should get their facts straight. It's not the religious freedom of the WOMEN that the Bishops are arguing about. It is about the freedom of the Catholic Church to operate without interference of the Federal Govt., THE RIGHT OF WHICH IS ENUMERATED IN THE FIRST AMENDMENT.

39 posted on 02/09/2012 5:40:07 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Oh, here we go...

It's not about what followers of the catholic are doing personally, it is what the federal government is trying to force on a church.

Freeze the target.
Polarize it.

Now the libs are going straight after catholics trying to change the tone of the argument in their favor by means of personal attacks.

42 posted on 02/09/2012 6:07:16 PM PST by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402

And how many Jews eat lobster? It doesn’t matter how many fall short.


45 posted on 02/09/2012 6:21:29 PM PST by Yaelle (Go Santorum! (He takes Paypal now for quick donations!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402; Graewoulf; VinceASA; Monkey Face; RIghtwardHo; pieces of time; Warthog-2; Tzar; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.


49 posted on 02/09/2012 8:02:50 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sr4402

I would add another point.

Why should health insurance pay for contraceptive devices for ANYONE?

The purpose of health insurance, like any other insurance, is to provide for emergencies. It makes absolutely no economic sense, let alone moral sense, for health insurance to pay for predictable, regular expenses. Bringing in the insurance companies for such expenses simply adds another layer of bureaucracy, and increases overall costs.

What is the point? It has nothing to do with HEALTH, anyway. If people choose to use contraceptives, let them buy them themselves. This makes no more sense than having a government program to buy people aspirin.


50 posted on 02/09/2012 8:29:21 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson