Yup, he wants to regulate stuff he doesn’t like but is incapable of realizing that those very same regulations and arguments will be used against him and stuff he does not want regulated. Even with a mountain of evidence starring him in the face, idiot.
So what is the way out, no regulations?
Funny, there are some I like, such as those that guarantee a 100,000 lb interstate overpass can truly take 100,000 lbs, that airliners have inspections so engines don't fall off and hit a school, or that the Tylnol I take isn't laced with poison or is even not effective.
You argument is over simplified to the point of adorable but hardly viable in reality.