So what is the way out, no regulations?
Funny, there are some I like, such as those that guarantee a 100,000 lb interstate overpass can truly take 100,000 lbs, that airliners have inspections so engines don't fall off and hit a school, or that the Tylnol I take isn't laced with poison or is even not effective.
You argument is over simplified to the point of adorable but hardly viable in reality.
At the federal level? I see no need for the federal government to regulate what an adult American eats, drinks or smokes. Which is what this discussion is about. And Oh I do not use illegals drugs. So I don't have an agenda other then defending personal liberty with was I thought, an important part of being a conservative.
Funny, there are some I like, such as those that guarantee a 100,000 lb interstate overpass can truly take 100,000 lbs, that airliners have inspections so engines don't fall off and hit a school, or that the Tylnol I take isn't laced with poison or is even not effective.
So let's regulate recreational drugs like we regulate Tylenol - no claiming effects it doesn't have, and no poisonous impurities. (And don't bother coming back with "recreational drugs are poisons" - too much Tylenol is also a poison.)