Something seems fundamentally wrong with giving a member of the executive branch this ability to legislate by fiat.
Is this a product of the progressive era?
1 posted on
01/28/2012 6:10:50 AM PST by
marktwain
To: marktwain
Can't ban firearms?
Ban the ammo.
2 posted on
01/28/2012 6:13:19 AM PST by
grobdriver
(Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
To: marktwain
Leave it to a politician to lower the bar, and then crawl under it.
Like this will work.
Keep it up, libs.
Revolution II is coming.
3 posted on
01/28/2012 6:14:01 AM PST by
Da Coyote
To: marktwain
Reminds me of a trip to walmart. I bought a brick of .22 rimfire. The lady asked if I was buying this for a handgun or for a rifle? Didn’t think much of it, just thought she was curious. I told her I was going to shoot it in a rifle.
She said good, if this was handgun ammunition she would have to get a manager to approve the sale.
To: marktwain
NJ? Why am I not surprised?
Headshake.
5 posted on
01/28/2012 6:24:54 AM PST by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
To: marktwain
Perfect example of legislative overreach. Why have a Bill of Rights or even pretend natural God-granted rights exist if any legislature can reclaim them at whim?
We need to relearn the subtle difference between inalienable and unalienable.
7 posted on
01/28/2012 6:29:02 AM PST by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: marktwain
Mexican marijuana smugglers say to let them know when smuggling a controlled substance you shoot makes them as much $$$ as smuggling a controlled substance you smoke...they're ready to expand their operation...
11 posted on
01/28/2012 6:38:37 AM PST by
AnTiw1
To: marktwain
Let’s ban police in the interests of canine safety.
13 posted on
01/28/2012 6:41:32 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Limbaugh: Tim Tebow miracle: "He had atheists praying to God that he would lose.")
To: marktwain
There is no way in pluperfect hell this would stand a court challenge. The SCOTUS has been very clear that ammo is just as much part of the 2nd Amendment as are guns themselves.
Working off the assumption that the Democrat legislature has been advised of this fact by their legal advisors, it likely means that they are just creating this to appeal to their anti-gun supporters and to force Christie to veto it.
To: marktwain
This is the same circle-jerk that Left has been dancing for the past fifty years.
If they can't get this law passed, they'll try for a $100 per cartridge/shell tax. And if they can't get that passed, they will try for a firing pin imprint. And if they can't get that they will go for serial numbers on all cartridges/shells/projectiles. And if they can't get that...
17 posted on
01/28/2012 8:16:00 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(FOREIGN AID: A transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries)
To: marktwain
Jersey voters worship cops. Ditto the suburbs of NY.
18 posted on
01/28/2012 8:25:17 AM PST by
Clemenza
("History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil governm)
To: marktwain
More evidence of the communists takeover of America.
To: marktwain
I misunderstood the title... I thought this was going to be a "Barney Fife" ruling, where the police were banned from carrying ammunition.
Actually, it would probably make more sense, given the corruption in NJ. The last thing you want is serious criminals to be armed. And save a log of family pets.
Mark
21 posted on
01/28/2012 10:21:20 AM PST by
MarkL
(Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson