He is not stuck with the facts. The judge declared he was issuing a default judgement before any evidence was submitted because Zippo and or his attorney decided not to show. So the facts of the judgement are "Defendant failed to appear before, and show this court that he is eligible for the office he seeks and to appear on the Georgia primary ballot." That's it. All the Orly stuff and the MvH stuff is fine but it is not "fact" of the decision.
And your expertise on default judgments is based on ...?
So the decision will basically be that he should be left off the ballot for lack of evidence and none of the substance presented in any of the 3 cases means anything?