To: Windflier
I really don't think you want to start comparing Gingrich's congressional voting record to Santorum's. Rick will lose that battle, just as surely as he's losing the presidential race. Perhaps... but, where does that leave me? Mitt is awful. Newt is extreme and unstable... Paul is a non-starter.
There AIN'T many good options left...
107 posted on
01/25/2012 8:05:49 PM PST by
SomeCallMeTim
( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them)
To: SomeCallMeTim
That said... I’d take ANY of these guys over McLame... so, I suppose things are “looking up!” :-)
108 posted on
01/25/2012 8:06:59 PM PST by
SomeCallMeTim
( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them)
To: SomeCallMeTim
Perhaps... but, where does that leave me? Mitt is awful. Newt is extreme and unstable... Paul is a non-starter. There AIN'T many good options left... I don't know what to tell you, Tim. Do what the rest of us have done, and do some due diligence on Newt's life and his record in office. I don't see how you could do that, and not come away thinking that Newt is a more than acceptable standard bearer for patriotic, constitutional conservatives.
This stuff about Newt being "extreme and unstable" is just reverberations of ancient liberal attacks on the man. Stop buying it, because it's just not true.
112 posted on
01/25/2012 8:24:11 PM PST by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson