So let’s see if I can get this right. The court in GA is saying we need to verify that the candidate is qualified. No one on the candidates side is offering qualifying documents so the court says to HI we need some docs. Then the candidates lawyers argue that GA has no authority to ask for the docs. So there will be no docs and the GA court will have no choice but to say no tickie no laundry....
In other words I am at a loss to understand why the candidates lawyers want to squash a subpoena that is being ignored in the first place. This is Russian Roulette IMO.
I think some are missing a valid point here.
The Court and Plaintiff’s dont need Hawaii necessarily to provide evidence.
The subpeona can be issued against OBAMA himself to produce the records!!!!
The big guns are laying cover for the small guns (Hawaii officials).
The small guns may go public under pressure. They have been allowed to get away with their dancing since 2008. And the shells are being ‘walked in on them’ now. So the covering fire is coming from WH to make them feel safe.
Brian Schatz should be put on the stand and asked directly:
“Why did you provide invalid candidate documents in 2008 that did not include the eligibility statement? What it an attempt to defraud the elections commission?”
Schatz knows, as do others in Hawaii. Emails and phone calls between Hawaii and Washington must be burning up the wires.
So, if this suit goes through, does it mean that O’s name will not appear on any presidential ballots in Georgia, and that his supporters in GA will either have to write him in or vote for someone else?
Why move to quash?...to prevent HI from producing documents directly to the court, and not through Obama.
Do the HI copies match obama’s copies?