Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives vs. Capitalism
National Review ^ | 1/9/2012 | Jay Nordlinger

Posted on 01/09/2012 6:24:44 PM PST by americanophile

The last two presidential election cycles have revealed a stinking hypocrisy in conservatives: They profess their love of capitalism and entrepreneurship, but when offered a real capitalist and entrepreneur, they go, “Eek, a mouse!” And they tear him down in proud social-democrat fashion. In the off season, they sound like Friedrich Hayek. When the game is on, they sound like Huey Long, Bella Abzug, or Bob Shrum.

Last time around, Mike Huckabee said Romney “looks like the guy who laid you off.” Conservatives reacted like this was the greatest mot since Voltaire or something. To me, Romney looked like someone who could create a business and hire the sadly unentrepreneurial like me.

Others said, “He looks like a car salesman,” or, worse, “a used-car salesman.” Ho ho ho! Commerce, gross, icky, yuck. Better Romney looked like an anthropology professor.

As I say in Impromptus today, I was watching a clip of Romney tangling with an “Occupy” protester last week. Romney was defending corporate profits. I was astounded. I don’t think I had ever seen a candidate do this. When the subject comes up, you’re supposed to denounce corporate profits or say, “Hey, nice weather we’re having, huh?”

Phil Gramm once explained to Bill Buckley why he never talked about free trade on the stump — he, a professor of economics and a free-marketeer: It wasn’t worth the trouble. “Free trade benefits almost everybody,” said Gramm. “But they don’t know who they are. Free trade hurts a few, and they all know who they are.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: buildingofficials; capitalism; economy; hoaqueens; nimbys; pensioners; planners; police; romneyism; teachers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
I'm disgusted by the anti-capitalist, Marxist/socialist class warfare rhetoric being used. I won't support any candidate that engages in it. I don't care who it's aimed at or why. It's thoroughly un-Republican, and un-conservative.
1 posted on 01/09/2012 6:24:52 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: americanophile
I agree with you, this a damn wrong.
2 posted on 01/09/2012 6:29:32 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
I agree with you, this is damn wrong.
3 posted on 01/09/2012 6:30:14 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
“Free trade benefits almost everybody,” said Gramm. “But they don’t know who they are. Free trade hurts a few, and they all know who they are.”

This is bunk. Free traitorism only benefits the small globalist elite that underwrites economics chairs at universities and bribes both parties.

4 posted on 01/09/2012 6:34:02 PM PST by mas cerveza por favor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

So his anti-gun, pro Romney Care, etc., stances mean nothing?

I don’t have have any problems with him being a captialist. I have problems with him being a Liberal. The fact that he was elected Governor of the People’s Democratic Republic of Massachusetts is proof enough for me.


5 posted on 01/09/2012 6:36:55 PM PST by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Hardcore Marxists Control Washington, D.C. And The Media


Click The Pic To Donate

Support The Resistance

6 posted on 01/09/2012 6:37:48 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

And for many many years have folks been saying the the R are really the same as the Rats, just a little less so? So R’s attacking free enterprise, capitalism and constitutionalism is not really all that surprising.


7 posted on 01/09/2012 6:38:20 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile; Jim Robinson

Mitt Romney is neither a true Republican nor a conservative. FR will continue to tear him a new one as per the owner.


8 posted on 01/09/2012 6:41:56 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
Did anyone say you had no right to bring up those items. No! But you seem to think anti capitalism is a great thing.
9 posted on 01/09/2012 6:42:54 PM PST by org.whodat (What is the difference in Newt's, Perry's and Willard's positions on Amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

I remind you all that there is a distinction between pro-market and pro-business (see Gov. Palin’s latest book, or better still the writings of her favorite Chicago-School economist Luigi Zingales). When the two diverge, I hope that most American conservatives will be pro-market, rather than pro-business.

Certainly corporate raiding or asset-stripping can serve a function in the economy rather like predators and carrion fowl serve in nature, but it is at best an unlovely part of capitalism, and at worst an abuse of capitalism. Do corporate raiders actually deliver shareholder value to the owners of the companies they take over, or do they line their own pockets as the new managers (and largest, though most often not majority shareholders) at the expense of their fellow owners? Too much of what passes for capitalism these days are managers delivering value for themselves at the expense of the shareholders, whose fiduciaries they are in theory. When “pro-business” policies support management shafting shareholders or plurality shareholders shafting the rest, I turn “anti-business”, and do so with a good conscience as a conservative. I’m not particularly interested in whether Bain Capital downsized companies to took over. I’m interested in how the other shareholders, the other capitalists who has perhaps originally built up the company, fared under Bain’s stewarship. From what I have read, they did not fare well, and that is reason enough to hold Bain’s behavior against Romney.


10 posted on 01/09/2012 6:43:44 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Rick Santorum just denounced this line of attack on Hannity’s show..

I’m not thrilled with some of today’s business tactics but they are what they are. The last company I worked for was bought by Collins and Aikman who promptly squeezed the value out of my company and dumped the corpse. Today Collins and Aikman are themselves gone after going chapter 11 in 07 (David Stockman’s watch)


11 posted on 01/09/2012 6:46:23 PM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Too bad you’re sacrificing something much bigger than Romney to do so...this is myopic! This issue isn’t Romney, it’s that the GOP is embracing this Marxist rhetoric. I’m absolutely astonished by this and the apparent approval of it. The means does not justify the ends here! Capitalism is one of the bedrock foundations of this nation.


12 posted on 01/09/2012 6:46:23 PM PST by americanophile ("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives" - Ataturk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Good for Santorum!


13 posted on 01/09/2012 6:47:43 PM PST by americanophile ("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives" - Ataturk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Perry is jumping in on this anti capitalism theme too. I think this is going to back fire big time. kinda validates the contention that their is no difference between the 2 parties, when the conservative party attacks conservative principles. Attack Mitt for being a capitalist and attack Paul for being a constitutionalist. wow, just wow.


14 posted on 01/09/2012 6:48:49 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

I figure by morning we’ll be hearing how Santorum is helping Romney and hoping for a VP slot.

This kind of crap is destroying the GOP more effectively than the left could ever hope to do.


15 posted on 01/09/2012 6:51:28 PM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
When I saw the Newt PAC add I thought at first it was a DNC add produced by the Occupy Wallstreet Crowd.

I am disgusted with the entire lot of candidates.

I am now resigned to the Anyone But Obama ticket.

16 posted on 01/09/2012 6:52:29 PM PST by not2worry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Romney is a liar and REAL conservatives WILL expose him. He’s as dishonest as they come and if you think he was an honest businessman and only dirty in politics you’re naive.


17 posted on 01/09/2012 6:53:50 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: not2worry

Newt is only retaliating because Romney brought up his consulting for Fannie Mae. Newt didn’t start that fight.


18 posted on 01/09/2012 7:08:32 PM PST by Kellis91789 (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

Bain invested in over 240 companies, overwhelmingly as startups or faltering companies in troubled industries with the intent to turn them around and eventually sell them. In no case was their original intent to “asset strip”. In the very few cases where they did asset strip a company it was because it failed and the the sum of the parts was worth more than the whole.A venture capital company answers to its shareholders not populist voters.In those instances they exercised good business judgement in selling off the assets to recoup some or all of their investments.I only wish Obama had provided the government with the ability to sell off Solyndra assets and recoup some of the taxpayers’ money instead of bargaining this right away to his bundlers who invested in the company.


19 posted on 01/09/2012 7:13:16 PM PST by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW; americanophile
You're exactly right. DJ.

Romney and Bain made a lot of their money as corporate raiders.

Romney talks about job creation. Let him open his books. Staples is one success: Mostly minimum wage jobs.

Talk is cheap and Romney has been proved a liar more times than we can count.

OWS was created for The Marxist to run against Romney. Let's see how Romney stands up to this during the primaries not afterward, when it's too late.

Just try to imagine Romney speeches and campaign events interrupted and jammed by OWS protests and other ilk all summer and up till Election Day in November!

NO ROMNEY! NO WAY!

GO NEWT!

20 posted on 01/09/2012 7:13:25 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson