Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Final results of the Free Republic 1/9/2012 non-Romney Conservative Straw Poll (see post 548)
Jim Robinson

Posted on 01/09/2012 11:15:29 AM PST by Jim Robinson

Edited on 01/10/2012 3:33:58 AM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]

If you are looking for a conservative alternative to Romney and had to choose today between Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry or Rick Santorum, which one would you choose?

Final results of the Free Republic 1/9/2012 non-Romney Conservative Straw Poll (see post 548)

Newt 225 59.7%
Perry 77 20.4%
Santorum 75 19.9%


TOPICS: Free Republic; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: elections; frstrawpoll; gingrich; newhampshire; perry; poll; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 641-655 next last
To: Jim Robinson

Newt, while he’s had his flaws was the only visionary who imagined that Republicans could actually win Congress. The rest of those sad sacks were willing to play lackeys to the Democrats forever. He believed, made others believe, had a plan, executed it and was a great success. After that I don’t remember seeing any public figure be so excoriated. He’s had a trial by fire. I think he could pull it together as President.

Sontorum is ok, he really, really, really had a chance to prove his conservative bonafides but blew it by endorsing Arlen Specter. If he had any thoughts of ever running for President he should have known this would be a problem. Even if he never planned on being President he should have never went with Specter.

Perry, just a non-starter for me.

So those are my rankings. I’m not doing cartwheels over any of them but Newt I think has the best chance of the bunch to be successful because of his experience. Hopefully he learned his lessons that no matter how much you try to play nice the Democrats and the media will still hate you, so stay conservative, take the slings and arrows and do the right thing.

I will not vote for Romney or Paul.

I was against voting for McCain last go round but got excoriated by the majority here. I did realize how horrid Obama would be so I got onboard and stubbornly voted for McCain instead of my original plan to write in Reagan to send a message to the establishment GOP who every time wants a mushy Republican to represent the party.

If it’s Romney I WILL write in Reagan, and I hope others do too and Reagan gets enough votes to foil Romney. We can win the House and Senate and neutralize an Obama second term, he’ll just play golf and vacation.

We’ve been getting Romney thrown down our throats since the day Obama took office. That used car salesman will never get my vote. I’d rather “throw it away” on Reagan.


201 posted on 01/09/2012 12:01:58 PM PST by word_warrior_bob (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs6qZd_xP1w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Newt. He’s the only one of the 3 that can and is willing to take the Kenyan Marxist down. Win or lose, Barry is going to get beat up badly and I think that is who he fears debating the most.


202 posted on 01/09/2012 12:02:45 PM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Newt Gingrich!




Donate Just One Monthly
And Become a FR Hero

Donate $1 A Day!
Isn't FR Worth It?




203 posted on 01/09/2012 12:02:50 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Perry feels like Fred Thompson to me. Looks great on paper, has all the promise in the world, and then blows it when he hits the spotlight. Been better in the last two weeks, but you don’t get a second chance to make a first impression.

Santorum is an unknown to most people. Those who knew him before his surge all agree his number one problem is himself; he is just bland and unexciting. Yeah, so was Calvin Coolidge, but it isn’t policy wonks who vote, but people wanting to find a reason to be inspired.

Gingrich is Gingrich. He has more baggage than a rented mule and a bigger foot in mouth problem than Biden. Sure he was a firebrand leader back in the 90’s, but he has made some serious missteps over the last 16 years or so. Scozzafava being the biggest one.

With all of those being said, I would have to support Gingrich at this point. He has the best record of actually pushing a Conservative agenda, he has been in proven leadership positions, he will do what is needed even if it is unpopular, and we know all of his baggage. Not having anything that can be used as a late game surprise is a plus for a candidate in my opinion.


204 posted on 01/09/2012 12:02:59 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Rick Perry

However, I can very enthusiastically support Newt (if Perry is not an option) for all the reasons you've previously outlined regarding his record. Newt is my second choice because he doesn't have the executive experience that I believe is critical.
205 posted on 01/09/2012 12:03:02 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

They’re crazy, not stupid.


206 posted on 01/09/2012 12:03:13 PM PST by Grunthor (At least he is better than Obama! Is NOT a rallying cry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Santorum


207 posted on 01/09/2012 12:03:23 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Newt Gingrich. I think he has the best ideas and he could actually get them done.


208 posted on 01/09/2012 12:04:29 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Rick Perry


209 posted on 01/09/2012 12:04:45 PM PST by sockmonkey (He's not perfect, but Perry is no wussy boy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Newt, Sir.


210 posted on 01/09/2012 12:05:02 PM PST by Chainmail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Santorum

I might add that some of us are for Santorum because we respect his positions, his values, and his character--not becuase he is simply the last "not-Romney" standing, as some have said. This week I looked through some of my old files on my computer, and I found the following that I wrote (on another site) on September 1, 2010. (That's 2010, not 2011.)

I don't think that he has much of a chance of being elected President, but, of those who seemed to have unofficially tossed their hats into the ring for 2012, he is my favorite at this point. There are a few others whose hats haven't been tossed in yet that I might like more, but I would enthusiastically support Santorum for President if he is our nominee. Enthusiastically.

After some of my other favorites decided not to run, such as Coburn, DeMint, and finally Mike Pence, I hopped aboard the Santorum bus and have been there ever since. I haven't had to hold my nose this campaign cycle. I haven't had any regrets.
211 posted on 01/09/2012 12:05:10 PM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Newt, Sir.


212 posted on 01/09/2012 12:05:19 PM PST by Chainmail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

MrEdd was a talking horse... but this Edd is the South end of a horse headed North.


213 posted on 01/09/2012 12:05:25 PM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: patlin

So, if none of the 3, then that leaves Ron Paul, Romney, Hunstman or Barry the Marxist, which is it?


214 posted on 01/09/2012 12:05:39 PM PST by mojitojoe (SCOTUS.... think about that when you decide to sit home and pout because your candidate didn't win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Perry. Because integrity really does matter and he’s a good shot.


215 posted on 01/09/2012 12:06:04 PM PST by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Poll ping


216 posted on 01/09/2012 12:06:17 PM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Gotta go with Perry as my first choice, but I’d support Newt.


217 posted on 01/09/2012 12:06:40 PM PST by Obadiah (If U don't believe you can win, then there is no point in getting out of bed at the end of the day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa; All

you post: “Newt-West 2012!”

My dream ticket. It would set the county on fire and the RATS/Media/Establishment purchasing hari kari swords.

‘O’Bumbles and Plugs debating these two? (I would take out stocks in popcorn and then retire)

Newt has telegraphed that he’d like Col. West for his VP. West is open to it.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Newt-Gingrich-Allen-West-2012/316988298315312

Newt has said he’d like Bolton for SOS - Bolton is open to it.

When the media, a week or so ago, tried to trick Newt into saying he’d pick Sarah for VP - he politely didn’t say he wouldn’t, but mentioned she’d be great to deal with the energy issue. Of course. Perfect.She has the expertise and track record.

Newt has said he will not keep ONE holdover from the current regime - a practice that has always assured gov’t as usual. He would put in non-Establishment people, in positions they are experienced in and ready to hit the ground running on.

And not just the RATS but the Establishment would be swept into the dust bin of history - and would not rise to any level of power again in our lifetimes.

Newt now, or consign your children, grandchildren and the rest of YOUR life to live under Socialism.

It really is that clear, that simple and that crucial.

It’s disconcerting to see that even so many Freepers do not realize that Newt has more aligned against him than any candidate in our lifetime - the RATs, the Media AND the party faithfuls. We defend Newt or lose our freedoms.


218 posted on 01/09/2012 12:06:40 PM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Newt, then Santorum.


219 posted on 01/09/2012 12:06:52 PM PST by manic4organic (We won. Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

So here is what we have to choose from:

1. Romney ( Liberal Democrat )
2. Newt ( Liberal Republican )
3. Santorum ( Republican Republican )
4. Paul ( Conservative Libertarian)
5. Perry ( Conservative Doofus)
6. Huntsman (who’s that guy?)

From this bunch I’m going to vote anyone but Obama this November. Could someone please explain to my why Sarah Palin is sitting this one out?


220 posted on 01/09/2012 12:06:52 PM PST by RC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 641-655 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson