Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: Rational Thought
171 posted on
01/06/2012 12:22:37 PM PST by
alstewartfan
(27 of 36 of Romney's judicial appointments were DEMOCRATS!!!!!)
To: Rational Thought; Impy; AuH2ORepublican
>>
What a difference a caucus makes. Rick Santorum who two months ago had one percent (1%) support among likely South Carolina Republican Primary voters now is running a close second there with 24% of the vote. <<
But...but... the Newt Gingrich fans kept INSISTING Santorum had absolutely "no following" outside of Iowa and his surge during the Iowa caucus was a "fluke" that wouldn't make a difference in any of the other 49 states. He needed to "drop out" and get behind "front runner" Newt Gingrich (who is polling BEHIND him not only in South Carolina, but New Hampshire as well)
Question: How many more primaries does Newt have to trail Santorum in before he's no longer the "front runner"?
177 posted on
01/06/2012 12:46:06 PM PST by
BillyBoy
(Illegals for Perry/Gingrich 2012 : Don't be "heartless"/ Be "humane")
To: Rational Thought
187 posted on
01/06/2012 1:16:44 PM PST by
Mechanicos
(Why does the DOE have a SWAT Team?)
To: Rational Thought
AAAAAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGHH
OH NOEZ OH NOEZ
Rick Santorum is creeping up on Willie Mitty...
What to do ??? What to do ???
To: Rational Thought
Looks like Newt is playing spoiler to keep a real conservative out of the nomination.
224 posted on
01/06/2012 4:57:45 PM PST by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: Rational Thought
So, the GOP keeps moving earlier the state primarys that will elect their choice, cut off any conservative hopeful and ensure the Inside the Beltway republican oligharchy choice,
by the time the dragged out election gets halfway through, the liberal media and Republican socialists will have their fix in and I wont even have a choice
235 posted on
01/06/2012 6:09:19 PM PST by
KTM rider
( with citizenship you get indentured servitude)
To: Rational Thought
"every single poll leading up to just before Christmas suggest that more than half of Iowa likely caucus goers have not firmly made up their minds." -Carl Cameron from The Bill O'Reilly Show 12/26/11 Why, after pointless predictions by pundits like Bill O'Reilly, do we only hear about some real details on the overhyped Iowa Primary a week before the vote? Have the polls done by the leftist/ad selling media ever been an honest view of how the country is voting for the GOP nominee?
"When the polls were wrong, which was often, they overestimated support for the Democrat, usually by about 6 to 10 points." Ann Coulter.
Until the media included the undecideds on Sunday, Gingrich was to own Iowa, followed by Romney. The rest really didn't matter. Here are the numbers from a Reuters story on Dec 12th of those likely to vote in the Iowa caucuses: Gingrich 29.8% Mitt Romney, 20.3%, Ron Paul 10.7%. U.S. Rep. Michele Bachman 8.5%, Rick Perry 8.2%. Since he didn't buy enough ads or hire enough ex/future media people from PR firms, and is a conservative that can win with conservative volunteers, Rick Santorum wasn't worth mentioning. Pat Caddell said that Santorum was in single digits a week before 01/03/12! Keep that in mind as you see the election results:
Santorum & Romney 25%, Paul 21%, Gingrich 13% Perry 10% Bachmann 5% Huntsman 1%.
Is there is a reason to trust a pundit claiming a candidate is "finished" after this "surprise"?
241 posted on
01/06/2012 6:30:48 PM PST by
pulaskibush
(Thou shalt tax/steal from Peter to help Paul/Pablo is not in the Bible!)
To: Rational Thought
CBS has Romney at 37 percent in SC and Santorum and Gingrich tied at 24 percent. Perry is not mentioned. The political establishment is strong in SC, and it is for Romney. That’s what we are up against with divided opposition.
245 posted on
01/06/2012 7:11:03 PM PST by
Theodore R.
(I'll still vote for the Right Rick --Santorum-- if he is on the April 3 ballot.)
To: Rational Thought
Gingrich and Santorum will knock Romney out of the race here!
Gingrich-Santorum
or
Santorum-Gingrich
256 posted on
01/06/2012 8:16:37 PM PST by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Rational Thought
Nikki Haley is an absolute disgrace. Really nothing more to say.
265 posted on
01/06/2012 10:37:36 PM PST by
Xeroes80
("An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools."- EH)
To: Rational Thought
The rise of Santorum is the road to victory for Romney.
269 posted on
01/07/2012 12:25:37 AM PST by
Nextrush
(President Sarah Palin sounds just right to me)
To: Rational Thought
Santorum or Gingrich are our two hopes for this nation's recovery and they are the only two who can truly beat Obama. You can't, again, believe the lies that a RINO will beat Obama...well you can, but it is fool-hearted.
274 posted on
01/07/2012 1:28:12 AM PST by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: Rational Thought
Pray, pray, pray - much evil can be averted with prayer. The Romney machine is evil.
275 posted on
01/07/2012 1:34:20 AM PST by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: Rational Thought
Romney just flew Gov Haley to NH to campaign for him
296 posted on
01/07/2012 10:19:54 AM PST by
katiedidit1
("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
To: Rational Thought
Romney is Pappy Bush with a bad hairdo...ain’t gonna happen. Sorry folks.
302 posted on
01/08/2012 2:12:59 PM PST by
Earthdweller
(Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson