Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Really?

Would a Paul Presidency be more dangerous that an Obama Presidency? Consider Paul's stands on national security and foreign policy...

At least Newt had the guts to say he wouldn't vote for the nut case...

1 posted on 12/28/2011 3:07:13 PM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TBBT

Are they sure he didn’t say ‘a lot of acid’?

That’s some bad trip, man.


2 posted on 12/28/2011 3:09:27 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

Another note...

It appears the deserved scrutiny of Paul in the media has all but dried up. Nary a headline today about Paul.

After the token coverage, the media can claim that they covered it.

Need to keep that Paul stalking horse factor going for a Romney victory...


3 posted on 12/28/2011 3:10:18 PM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

newt says he’d vote for obama?

what a turd


4 posted on 12/28/2011 3:12:01 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

If Paul was the only alternative to Obama?

A Paul vote seems the most logical.


5 posted on 12/28/2011 3:14:33 PM PST by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the constitution"-Obama official)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT
The former Pennsylvania senator said ultimately he would vote for Paul in order to have anyone other than President Obama in the White House, with the hope that if Paul won the office, "enough pressure could be brought to bear on him that he won't make these horrific [decisions]."

Makes sense to me. If we win the Senate and hold the House, we can control this dottering old nitwits BS a lot more effectively than this Marxist POS we have. I think this is a better tact running for the Primaries than picking a fight with opponents supporters you are trying to get on your side in the General.

6 posted on 12/28/2011 3:15:11 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

They need to answer by telling the questioner that voting for Paul won’t be a consideration as he intends to be the nominee, not Paul. Playing to these gotcha questions doesn’t any of them any good.

Paul won’t be the nominee IMO.


8 posted on 12/28/2011 3:16:57 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT
"...he would "absolutely" vote for Ron Paul if he were the alternative to President Obama."

Sure - I'd vote for a Lyndon LaRouche/Rev. Jim Jones ticket as an alternative to Obama....

9 posted on 12/28/2011 3:17:08 PM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT
I agree with him and I'd go one farther. As much as I dislike Ron Paul, I'd vote for him before Obama or Romney.
10 posted on 12/28/2011 3:18:21 PM PST by Antoninus (Defeat Romney--Defeat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

So did Newt say that if Paul was the nominee he would vote for Obama ? Or not vote at all ?

I don’t know, I’m actually wonderin’ if any candidate would actually say they would either a) not vote at all or b) vote for Obama under any circumstance.

IMHO, it’s hard for a candidate to say they’d vote for the other party or not vote for the nominee of their own party. Seeing as how they are seeking their own party’s nomination.


11 posted on 12/28/2011 3:22:23 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

I am not a Ron Paul fan.

BUT, I would vote for Ron Paul before voting for Mitt Romney......


14 posted on 12/28/2011 3:32:15 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT
People who want Run Paul to be president want the US to become a target for every violent weirdo and terrorist in the world. America's enemies couldn't buy a better ally than Run Paul; he's ideologically committed to help our enemies.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2011/dec/26/former-paul-aide-offers-odd-defense-ex-boss-tolera/

18 posted on 12/28/2011 3:41:24 PM PST by elhombrelibre ("I'd rather be ruled by the Tea Party than the Democratic Party." Norman Podhoretz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT
Would a Paul Presidency be more dangerous that an Obama Presidency?

To marxists & authoritarians, yes....

23 posted on 12/28/2011 4:02:45 PM PST by sargon (I don't like the sound of these "boncentration bamps")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

It amazes me that anyone calling themselves a Conservative could ever vote for Paul under any circumstances....


27 posted on 12/28/2011 5:04:56 PM PST by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TBBT

He would vote for an anti-Christian Muslim to be president?


29 posted on 12/29/2011 7:09:47 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson