What else do you and Dr. Paul have in common?
Legalizing drugs? Making Iran our new BFF? Disowning Reagan? 911 conspiracies? Anti-semitism? Disowning Lincoln? Sucking up to the Taliban? Repealing the Patriot Act? Taking the border fence off the table?
How about handing the Republican nomination to Mitt Romney, and then guaranteeing an Obama victory with an ego third party run?
He blames American fisrt.
He’s says the terrorist were justified in killing innoncent Americans on 911.
He would rather raise the white flag of surrender rather than fight.
As opposed to the stupid party nominating Romney in the first place? How is that a win for team stupid?
“Disowning Lincoln?”
I’ve got no problem with that one. Lincoln marks the absolute lowest point of the Presidency, as far as I’m concerned.
I must admit my own temptation to vote for Ron Paul in that event. Better to lose with a man willing to fight then to win with a man willing only to surrender & join the enemy in all but name.
“How about handing the Republican nomination to Mitt Romney, and then guaranteeing an Obama victory with an ego third party run?”
You’ve got it about one third right. The useless and feckless gop will nominate mittens. That’s their call and their responsibility. And Ron Paul will most likely run third party. Who wins is anyones guess, but I imagine it will be barky. Not that there is a lot of difference between mittens and barky anyway.
As for ego, naaah. Ron Paul is not all that interested in running to be President for the sake of being President. Like most libertarians, he sees elections and political office as a means to an end, not an end in itself.