Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich tells gay Iowa man Scott Arnold:You’re better off voting for Obama
NY Daily News ^ | 12/21/2011 | Aliyah Shahid

Posted on 12/21/2011 6:46:36 AM PST by Responsibility2nd

Newt Gingrich isn't exactly chasing the gay vote.

The Republican presidential candidate told a homosexual Iowa man at a campaign event on Tuesday to vote for President Obama.

Scott Arnold, a Democrat and associate professor of writing at William Penn University, approached the ex-House speaker in Oskaloosa wanting to know how Gingrich would represent him as President, according to the Des Moines Register.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gayvote; homosexualagenda; ia2012; newt; newt2012; newtgingrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-153 next last
To: Sudetenland
This crap journalism.

Seen any other kind lately? I haven't. The main street media is despicable, and in the tank completely for Odumbo and his libtard army of communist aficionados.
61 posted on 12/21/2011 7:35:40 AM PST by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

“Newt will treat homosexuals no different than any other citizen, but he will not pander to them.”

Well...
There goes the support of 60-70% of today’s mainstream media, including most of the management.

they don’t call the entirely-queer New York Times Editorial Board “The Gay Mafia”, for nothing...


62 posted on 12/21/2011 7:35:56 AM PST by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

Okay, what does Rick Perry say to the same gay guy who comes up to him and asks, “What are you going to do for the gays?”


63 posted on 12/21/2011 7:36:27 AM PST by Choose Ye This Day (The thing that counts is not what we could do, but what we actually do. -- Leo Spears)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger
Is that the best Newt can come up with?

We're getting one side of the story, and probably from a liberal plant at that. I'm sure Newt's answer was a bit more involved than reported or else that the guy asking the questions was confrontational, perhaps rude, and so finally Newt tells him to just go support the other side since it's obvious you're never going to agree with me and that you never were interested in having a genuine discussion in the first place.

64 posted on 12/21/2011 7:37:15 AM PST by Humbug (the media rule the world and they know it....they are our true foe, not the puppet in the WH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland

“...uncharacteristically fluffed him off.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Really?? You see it that way? Look at the replies on this thread. 9/10 FReepers think Newt deserves an “attaboy” for this answer.

If Newt didn’t blow off (no pun intended) this perv, then he should have.


65 posted on 12/21/2011 7:37:39 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Is there a video for this encounter? I’d like to hang it on my wall. :)


66 posted on 12/21/2011 7:38:10 AM PST by Lady Lucky (Merry Christmas to all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

The professor undoubtedly is a total liberal as well as gay so telling him about cutting the deficit, etc, would be pointless.

Of course the professor is a liar. He wasn’t there to ask an honest question but Gingrich gave him an honest answer.


67 posted on 12/21/2011 7:39:11 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

So. You would vote for Obama over Romney. Got it. Good to know.


68 posted on 12/21/2011 7:39:31 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
As someone who used to listen to “W” being interviewed on a local sports talk show when he was managing partner of the Rangers, one of the things I liked about him was his impatience with stupid questions and his sharp tongue/quick-wit (Very much like his mother).

It completely disappeared when he went to DC. I kept waiting for that guy to make an appearance at press conferences, but it never happened.

This time around, I want a fighter. I want someone who is willing to change the language. Someone who is willing to talk about budgets from a base line, and not the bizarre DC terminology that claims a 4% increase is a huge cut that will starve children and kill women.

I want an agency serial killer.

I want the blunt rude truth.

69 posted on 12/21/2011 7:40:43 AM PST by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

“Is that the best Newt can come up with?
Ok, you oppose same sex marriage and so do I. But, we really want to tell people to go vote for the other guy? God forbid this loose cannon becomes our candidate.”

Here, I’ll explain it to you. When a democrat comes up to you trying to get you to pander to him so he can say “Look at the mealy-mouthed republican try to pander to me!”, you tell the democrat to go take a flying leap.


70 posted on 12/21/2011 7:42:31 AM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
... lately I see more similarities betwen Newt and Nixon. I do. Nixon was a devious schemer and so is Newt. Nixon had the bones to engage his enemies as does Newt...


71 posted on 12/21/2011 7:42:37 AM PST by Albion Wilde (A land of hyper-legalisms is not the same as a land of law. --Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: apillar; All

“Homosexuals make up well less than 5% of voters,”

Yet SO MUCH of today’s mainstream media, as has been documented on FR, for a decade.

In 2008, 58% of NBC News New York Staffers were Bi,Gay, Lesbian, or Trans-Gendered. The Village Voice calls the New York Times Editorial Board “The Gay Mafia”. Every single one of them, including Pinch, is gay, and almost all are Radical Gays.

This list could go on and on. these are the people who are feeding the Democrat Propaganda into your home.


72 posted on 12/21/2011 7:42:41 AM PST by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Newt supporter here, but that was dumb. he should have said, “if you care about what really matters right now, don’t vote for Obama, because all the gay rights issues won’t matter when the economy is trashed and the rest of our freedoms are gone”.


73 posted on 12/21/2011 7:42:53 AM PST by Paradox (The rich SHOULD be paying more taxes, and they WOULD, if they could make more money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I'll vote for Perry in the primary, but if it comes to Romney/Obama in the general I will leave it blank. I would vote for Newt in the general.
74 posted on 12/21/2011 7:43:15 AM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

“There goes the support of 60-70% of today’s mainstream media, including most of the management.”

What % of them do you suppose supported him prior to this alleged comment?


75 posted on 12/21/2011 7:43:33 AM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Translation: Queers should vote queerly because their queer..


76 posted on 12/21/2011 7:43:49 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

 


77 posted on 12/21/2011 7:46:54 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

woot !

Go Newt!

tell it like it is!


78 posted on 12/21/2011 7:47:23 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Newt Gingrich 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Attack

“”What you don’t tell him is that my America doesn’t include you, which is essentially what Newt did.””

So you know what Newt told him? Please tell the rest of us!


79 posted on 12/21/2011 7:47:41 AM PST by getitright (If you call this HOPE, can we give despair a shot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Why should homosexuals be given the nod by anyone that they are unique or separately identifiable for particular political attention?

We have already made that mistake with blacks, latinos, asians, muslims, Jews and women.

and it’s a viper nest

all designed to do nothing but diminish the politica power of the majority (and founding) culture by the power of it’s own emotion


80 posted on 12/21/2011 7:49:12 AM PST by wardaddy (Michelle, Sarah, Perry now Newt over Mitt.....that is how I've seen it and it's where we are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson