Posted on 12/17/2011 12:08:44 PM PST by SeekAndFind
To recap:
Some 160 million Americans will watch their taxes rise about $1,000 each, if the current payroll-tax cut ends on January 1.
Millions of jobless Americans will see their unemployment benefits run out, if the federal government does not extend them by year’s end.
The Iranian government this week threatened to shut the Strait of Hormuz and bottle up a key route that oil tankers use to deliver petroleum to an energy-hungry planet.
President Obama could fix the first two problems and ameliorate the dangers of the third, if he would sign legislation to extend the tax cut and unemployment benefits.
The sticking point, of course, is Republican language requiring Obama to make a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline, which would transport friendly oil from the Canadian oil sands to refineries in Texas. While America moans beneath an 8.6 percent unemployment rate, the pipeline would create 20,000 well-paying jobs in labor-happy industries. That’s why the AFL-CIO and other unions support Keystone.
Obama and the Democrats claim that Keystone XL is environmentally risky. To hear them speak, Keystone would scar the pristine line separating America from its peaceful neighbor and then despoil sensitive land and habitat across the fruited plains. As this map shows, however, the U.S.-Canadian border and the path the project would take already are swarming with pipelines:
While the map above shows pipelines that carry all commodities, those that transport crude oil and refined petroleum products are numerous all by themselves. At least twelve such pipelines already intersect the northern frontier, as this map illustrates:
Obama and his comrades complain further that Keystone XL would jeopardize the Ogallala Aquifer, a sort of underground Great Lake that runs from South Dakota to Texas. Here again, Democrats might have a point if Keystone XL were the first pipeline to traverse the aquifer. However, as the map below confirms, this is a bit like worrying about the growth of America’s welfare state: Too late!
So, America either should install Keystone XL, with all of its benefits, or — if such pipelines really are as dangerous as Democrats argue — yank out all these pipelines that could destroy Ogallala.
Most galling, the U.S. House–approved bill, which the Senate will consider soon, does not require President Obama to endorse Keystone XL. It merely directs him to make a decision on it within 60 days. Under the GOP-backed provision, Obama could kill Keystone XL — but he would have to make up his mind either way.
But rather than lead, Obama prefers to straddle. He wants to delay a decision until after the November 2012 election, to avoid offending either Big Labor or the environmental movement. If he can slither quietly between the two, Obama reckons, his reelection prospects grow.
Agree or disagree with them, the Left used to make valid points, although their solutions usually were wrong. Now, increasingly and especially with Keystone, they have no case, no issue, and no argument other than: “NO!”
— New York commentator Deroy Murdock is a nationally syndicated columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace at Stanford University.
He will approve it. He’s delighted that the GOP solved his political dilemma. Before, he had the choice of angering the environmentalists or angering the unions. Now, he can make the unions happy, and blame the environmental consequences on the GOP. It’s the perfect scenario to him.
Obama has to choose:National security or securing the votes of the socialist wing of the Democrat party.It’s an election year so guess what,the country can go to hell as long as he gets reelected.
Update: the Senate passed the bill today, 89-10.
Notable among the naysayers, Jim DeMint.
So when Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, Obama will say, “Pretty please, can you open it back up?”
The Ogallala is already being destroyed -- by over pumping much in excess of natural recharge. And some of that water is being used to grow corn for conversion to ethanol fuel for vehicles, a use supported by tax breaks and that would be unnecessary if the US was allowed to produce sufficient oil from its own resources or new processes to convert to ethanol from coal, oil and natural gas move forward.
Of course the real reasons environmentalists oppose the pipeline do not involve protection of the Ogallala. They oppose use of the tar sands in northern Alberta which will be the source of the oil for its environmental impacts locally, because of the energy used and CO2 emitted to extract the oil, and because a new source of US oil will delay their attempts to force Americans from fossil fuel energy to that of their world of solar and windmills.
You’ve summed it all up nicely.
Thanks SeekAndFind.
Thanks! Ironically we're being sold down the drain by descendants of the original oil developers.
Came across this last night and was amazed at how much just one foundation (Pew Charitable Trust with $7.6 billion in assets) has given to environmental, "social justice" and other liberal/leftwing organizations dedicated to destroying our lifestyle in pursuit of their socialist aims. It has distributed funds to over 60 of these groups the past 20 years including $140 million to the Tides Foundation, $12 million to the NRDC, $22 million to Earth Justice, $4.3 million to the Sierra Club, etc., etc., etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.