Posted on 12/10/2011 3:43:05 PM PST by kristinn
Where: Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa.
When: 9 p.m. EST, 6 p.m. PST, Saturday, December 10, 2011. Debate scheduled to last two hours.
Broadcast on: ABC Televsion.
Moderators: Diane Sawyer and George Stephanopoulos.
Candidates: Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and Rick Santorum.
Yes the prince is such a powerful intellect only the best of the best could hope to stand toe to toe with his highness.
However, the circumstances surrouding our relationship with the Soviet Union is far different than our role as the intermediary between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Ostensibly, we have tried to be an objective mediator helping both parties to arrive at a solution. Once you describe one party to the negotiations as illegitimate, you have lost all credibility with the Palestinians. I don't think the Israelis would find that helpful.
I think Perry may have a shot at VP,hard to say.
Bachman is out...should have never mentioned Cain..Don’t let the door.....
Hey Steffynopolous
what do you think about the family values of your old boss Bill Clinton who had numerous affairs and cheated on his wife with a 20 year old intern while in the Oval OFfice
then committed perjury and was impeached by the House? What do you think about that George?
I’ll score it:
Perry win
Newt place
Paul show
Santorum fourth
Michele fifth
Romney sixth
Obama toast
***************************************
I like your score card!
Well, they tried to GET Newt on defense, and failed miserably. He swatted each of their catty little questions away like pesky flies.
The guy really IS a master debater. If he get the nomination, can you imagine what he would do to Obama in a debate?
I don’t care. Get it!
BWAAHAHAHAHA...
Obviouisly this Dear Freeper didn’t watch the debate.
Hahahahahahaaaaa
But it was a good try....
I was surprised how well Santorum did, followed by Bachmann and then Paul and Romney. I did not think Gingrich did that well this time.
I did......and do....lmao
Bachmann, Santorum, and Romney.
My gut says that Newt is considering Perry...just the way he looked at him....someone he could groom for the future.
The ABC commentators seem unanimous in the feeling that Romney put his foot in his mouth big-time, and deflated much good feeling and support with his $10,000 bet challenge to Perry.
Having said that, everyone came off pretty well, the moderators were refreshingly serious and free of fishing
for “gotcha” moments. Romney was the biggest loser primarily because he had to most to lose, needed a lift from this debate, and barely managed to stay even with where he’s always been as a popular but “flat-lined” candidate.
Among the remaining serious contenders, the ones who got the biggest lifts in a practical, primary-vote garnering sense, are, in order , Gingrich,Perry, and Bachmann.
Gingrich, it should be unnecessary to emphasize here, is NOW the leading contender, on probably an unstoppable upward trajectory.
Rick Perry is the jester to Prince 0.
The amnesty part.
Against someone who does not pull punches, and head to head, he would fold like a card table chair.
His whole aura of master debater is nothing more than a media created caricature, while the actual big O is nothing, absolutely nothing.
Fairly or unfairly I think Perry has been really demonized by the msm on his errors. I think it has really hurt his chances.
Why do people think Obama is such a great orator?
Because the MSM told us he is?
Obama cant talk to 4th graders without a teleprompter.
Even with a teleprompter this clown screws stuff up.
You haven’t even seen what Perry is capable of.
I’ll just say, lets compare Perry’s record of success to Barry’s record of pain and failure.
Bachmann is only after the votes of his supporters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.