Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Signs Pledge to Build Fence Along Southern Border
ABC News ^ | December 1, 2011 | Russell Goldman

Posted on 12/01/2011 5:32:02 PM PST by presidio9

Newt Gingrich, whose GOP competitors accuse him of being soft on illegal immigration, pledged Thursday, if elected president, to build a double fence along the Mexican border during his first days in the White House.

“We haven’t been able to build a fence on the border because we have not been a serious country,” the former House speaker said at an event in Iowa, before he signed his name to the pledge sponsored by the activist group Americans for Securing the Border.

Gingrich has maintained that the border needs securing but has also suggested that some of the 11 million illegal immigrants living in the U.S. be permitted to stay in the U.S. legally. Some of his competition, including Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, has called that policy “amnesty.”

Bachmann was the first candidate, and is the only other 2012 contender to sign the pledge.

The candidates pledge “to support and speedily expedite the construction of a date-certain, secure multi-layered fence (fence locations to be specified

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gingrich; newt; reevaluategingrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: South40

Read my tag. I’m supporting Rick Perry. I made the decision to support Perry a couple weeks ago.

Hmmm, so that 32 tons of pot and elaborate underground tunnel with electric cars and lighting notwithstanding, it’s working well? Good. I guess you won’t need any boots on the ground nor Predator drones then. I’m sure that President Perry and Sheriff Joe will keep a watchful eye over San Diego nonetheless. :)


61 posted on 12/01/2011 7:33:54 PM PST by Quicksilver (nominate Rick Perry - defeat Obama - overhaul Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Finally someone with some sense, thank you.


62 posted on 12/01/2011 7:38:50 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: South40
Wait? Are you saying that Gingrich was not referring to a revised worker visa program that he had just proposed and out lined on the previous page and a half (starting with page 8)?

Personally, I think your false outrage posts about "civility" and "name-calling" were working a little better than making stupid claims and hoping no one calls you on it.

63 posted on 12/01/2011 7:40:38 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: South40
From the 25-page paper, starting with page 8, and ending with the statement you keep referring to but don't understand:

4. Establish a Worker Visa Program.

Along with total border control, we need to make it easier for people to get work visas to enter the country legally and to work here at a specific job for a set of period of time and as long as they obey the law. We need a worker visa program that ensures that work visa holders pay taxes, get driver’s licenses, buy auto insurance, abide by the law. Such a program will also filter out criminals and potential terrorists, which is why we will require from foreign governments a continually updated list of their criminals.

Required Elements of a Worker Visa Program. As a part of this program, every work visa holder will be required to:

a. Carry a “smart card” with a photograph and bio-metric identifier, like a thumbprint and/or an embedded retinal scan that will be entered into a database so that their presence in the United States can be validated;

b. Sign an agreement in which the work visa holder agrees to pay taxes, obey the law, and waive any rights to appeal his or her removal from the United States within 72 hours for violating their agreement; and

c. Open and maintain an account at any U.S. financial institution with an American Bankers Association routing number into which employers of work visa holders will be required to electronically deposit their wages. No bank account, no smart card.

Additional Incentives for Work Visa Holders.

As we think through every aspect of a practical and enforceable legal policy on immigration and work visa holders, we must continue to be creative in crafting additional incentives that will ensure compliance with the rules of a worker visa program.

One example of a creative incentive is to require each work visa holder to establish a mandatory 10% tax free savings account drawn on a regular basis from the wages that are being deposited into the work visa holder’s required bank account. This account will have a tax free build up, which the work visa holder would be allowed to withdraw upon his or her timely return to the home country. Requiring such an account would provide an additional assurance that the work visa holder will return home on time as well as create a nest egg for the work visa holder to use to start a business or go to school back home. In the event that a work visa holder failed to return to their home country in the time period set out in their agreement, their bank account (and 10% savings account) would be frozen until such time as the work visa holder returned home.

Administrative Aspects of a Worker Visa Program.

As an administrative matter, the worker visa program smart card system will be outsourced to a company like Visa, Mastercard or American Express so people who actually know how to run a sophisticated card and computer program with expert systems for tracking fraud would be implementing the smart card program. We should have zero confidence that a federal government agency can run this program effectively. These companies can work with Kelly Services-like companies in Mexico and elsewhere to coordinate the work visa holder program and provide screening (e.g. felon check lists, other background check). Kelly Services-like companies offer staffing solutions that include temporary staffing services, staff leasing, outsourcing, vendor on-site and full-time placement and would therefore be valuable components of a worker visa program. The Vernon K. Krieble Foundation has been in the forefront of thinking through the design of such a private sector approach to managing a worker visa program that has met with widespread support.

5. Zero Tolerance for Amnesty.

As Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger put it so eloquently in a Los Angeles Times op-ed on March 28, “We can embrace the immigrant without endorsing illegal immigration. Granting citizenship to people who are here illegally is not just amnesty ... it's anarchy. We are a country of immigrants, yes. But we are also a nation of laws. People who want to be citizens will want to do it the right way.”

And doing it the right way means that all those who are currently working in the United States illegally and who wish to apply for the worker visa program must return to their home country and apply. Application for the worker visa program should not be permitted in the United States under any circumstances.

Anything less than requiring people who are working here illegally to return home to apply for a worker visa is amnesty.

64 posted on 12/01/2011 7:45:59 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
You have the stats on those employees and independent contractors? And whats the difference? If you hire then you`ve broken the law, period! Get caught and get burned. Seems to me you`re simply dismissing the whole idea out of hand, why? BTW, if you set up an anonymous tipster line and give the tipster ten percent of each fine, or a set bounty, then what will that do for the illegal population? Put a bounty on them in the form of rewards financed by the fines themselves and how many illegals will get turned in then? Imagine the housing packed with illegals and how tempting that will be to an informant if the illegals all have bounties? If you`re a landlord, will you risk renting if you know you`ll go to a federal prison and loose everything you own? And what does it matter how long they`ve been here, if they`re illegal they can`t work or get any assistance, period. Harbor them, help them, and you`ve committed a federal offense and opened an expensive and painful can of legal whoop@$$ on yourself.

Aid an illegal and loose your shirt to fines and your freedom to a prison cell. Along WITH a greatly stepped up presence along the border, you`re HONESTLY saying that won`t work? REALLY?

65 posted on 12/01/2011 7:52:59 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

It all depends on the size and length of fence.


66 posted on 12/01/2011 8:01:28 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
BTW, you also deport ALL the illegals you do catch as well since they are criminals. After all, that is what ILLEGAL means, isn`t it?
67 posted on 12/01/2011 8:01:42 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: nomad
You have the stats on those employees and independent contractors?

Do your own research if you please. I stand by the statement that a large percentage of illegals work as independant contractors to individuals. Add in the ones working for very small business, and yes, it is approaching a majority of all illegals immigrants in this country. Find something that proves otherwise, and I will revise that opinion. But this entire exercise is irrelevant, because either way, we are still talking about millions and millions of individuals. And, no, there is no political will in this country for going after indivuals who hire illegal maids and such, even if such a thing was feasible.

What you really need to do is get back to the original point. Since all of the Republicans seem to want to seal the borders (pick your method), and enforce the laws, it comes down to will they all leave when we do. Newt seems to expect most of them to do just that. He's talking about what we would do with those who don't.

68 posted on 12/01/2011 8:02:44 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Did you not read your own cited report? I read several pages and it sounds just like what he is saying now. Some of it is exactly the same language. A very in depth report.

Thank you for citing it. It verifies that Newt is NOT a flip flopper.


69 posted on 12/01/2011 9:06:38 PM PST by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Then you base your statement on supposition. So much for your argument.


70 posted on 12/01/2011 9:28:15 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Tell me you love me. Whisper those sweet nothings in my ear. At least until the morning...


71 posted on 12/01/2011 10:04:25 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

Newt will put troops on the border - maybe as many as 23,000 pulled out of “National Security” - let them do some honest work.

ahaha, I just got an idea - deep six the TSA at the airports and shuffle them all down to the border. Well, on further thought, shuffle ‘em ACROSS the border.

Newt on the border - His FIRST move: CLOSE THE BORDER.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9JxGh4-SpA

President: Newt
VP: Col West
Energy Sec: Palin
AG: Giuliani
UN attack dog: Bolton

that my dream


72 posted on 12/01/2011 10:18:46 PM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: South40
Not only is he a flip-flopper, he is a pro-amnesty flip-flopper.

San Diego...I get it now.

It seems that anything short of sending them all back is amnesty to you. I'll expect a significant and successful effort from Newt to close the border before any "amnesty" is put in the works.

At the front lines would you accept a highly secure border by 2014 followed by a practical plan to deal with the 20 million illegals if could be made to happen??

73 posted on 12/01/2011 10:32:38 PM PST by topfile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome; All

You remark: “Would Newt cave the first time a marxist federal judge “stays” the fence building for whatever reason?”

I think the marxist judges are going to be the ones folding - or folded.

NEWT ON JUDGES

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V4vFArOtQo


74 posted on 12/01/2011 10:43:08 PM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: topfile
It seems that anything short of sending them all back is amnesty to you.

Anything less than requiring people who are working here illegally to return home to apply for a worker visa is amnesty.
~Newt Gingrich 4/26/2006

75 posted on 12/01/2011 10:49:30 PM PST by South40 (Just say NO to pro-ILLEGAL alien RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; Gator113; County Agent Hank Kimball; dixiechick2000; altura
Post 22 on this thread is a must view for Cain and Perry boltslingers here

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2815022/posts?page=22#22

I for one am tired of being threatened with zots by folks who can't deliver them but seem to have a peculiar delight in calling for them

JR may indeed prefer others before Newt..I think that is likely true for any Newt supporter here...I know it is for me...see tagline.

But it is not a zot offense.

I feel better, I ain't gonna lie.

76 posted on 12/01/2011 10:53:29 PM PST by wardaddy (Michelle, Sarah, Perry now Newt over Mitt.....that is how I've seen it and it's where we are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600; presidio9
Newt supports those state's efforts to curb illegal immigration.

Rubio, beloved here does not.

Gingrich said every state should have laws like those Alabama, Arizona and South Carolina have enacted that aim to curb undocumented immigration by allowing the questioning of individuals suspected of being undocumented immigrants.

77 posted on 12/01/2011 10:56:53 PM PST by wardaddy (Michelle, Sarah, Perry now Newt over Mitt.....that is how I've seen it and it's where we are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome; All

Here’s another stance on judges by Newt -

instead of leaning on your own uniformed opinion - why not listen to Newt says himself - so her’s a SECOND clip on judges, 2009 - start watching at minute marker 4:50

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtjfMjjce2Y


78 posted on 12/01/2011 10:57:18 PM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver
I made the decision to support Perry a couple weeks ago.

You've been supporting RINO Rick for months. What you mean is you just recently decided to admit it.

Hmmm, so that 32 tons of pot and elaborate underground tunnel with electric cars and lighting notwithstanding, it’s working well?

I know you support pro-ILLEGAL alien candidate RINO Rick and I know you are willing to deny and/or denounce any and everything positive when it comes to the idea of a fence. But you should at least get informed.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before the fence was built, all that separated that stretch of Mexico from California was a single strand of cable that demarcated the international border.

Back then, Border Patrol agent Jim Henry says he was overwhelmed by the stream of immigrants who crossed into the United States illegally just in that sector.

"It was an area that was out of control," Henry says. "There were over 100,000 aliens crossing through this area a year." Today, Henry is assistant chief of the Border Patrol's San Diego sector. He says apprehensions here are down 95 percent, from 100,000 a year to 5,000 a year, largely because the single strand of cable marking the border was replaced by double — and in some places, triple — fencing.

San Diego Fence Provides Lessons in Border Control

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You do know the difference between 95% and 100%, don't you Quick?

79 posted on 12/01/2011 11:10:30 PM PST by South40 (Just say NO to pro-ILLEGAL alien RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Newt’s damned if he does, and damned if he doesn’t.

But his numbers keep on rising. “;^)


80 posted on 12/01/2011 11:22:21 PM PST by b9 (NEWTer the Whitehouse in 2012 *you betcha*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson